22% of Memphis landlords cut rent in July. 1 in 5 cut twice.

22% of Memphis landlords cut rent in July. 1 in 5 cut twice.

Andrew GlissonBusiness Member
Property Manager · Memphis · Member since 2026 · 135 posts · 95 votes

I run a property management company here, and we track listings across platforms. In July, 4,288 listings inside the city limits came through our collection. 941 of them dropped their asking price at least once.

That's 21.9% of the market marking itself down in a single month. Here's where.

The spread is almost 4 to 1 across the city. East Memphis sits at the top with better than a third of its listings cutting. South Memphis is at the bottom near one in ten, with Orange Mound and Whitehaven just above it.

I went in assuming this would track with price, and it doesn't. East Memphis is the most expensive ZIP on that chart and it's #1, but Frayser is the cheapest in the city and lands square in the middle, while South Memphis brings up the rear. Run the correlation between a ZIP's cut rate and its median rent and you get 0.26 across 18 ZIPs, which is another way of saying no relationship. So whatever is happening here, it isn't a rich-versus-poor split.

The number I'd actually act on

Everything above counts a listing once. Cut fifty bucks in week two and you're in that 21.9%, same as somebody who marked down three separate times. Those aren't the same landlord, and pulling them apart is where the money shows up.

About three quarters of the people who cut got it done in one move and ended fifty dollars under their opening ask. Cheap tuition.

The other quarter is the problem. Roughly one in five cutters had to mark down more than once, and the hole deepens every time they go back. Two cuts and you're a hundred under. Three and you're $155 under where you started, having spent most of the month getting there.

That's the actual cost, and it isn't the rent. It's the weeks of empty house you paid for while you discovered your number was wrong fifty dollars at a time. A hundred off a $1,300 house is real, but six weeks of vacancy on that same house is worth more than the cut, and you only paid it because the first number was a guess.

What this doesn't say

It doesn't say Memphis rents fell, and I want to be clear about that because it's the easy way to misread it. This counts how often owners marked their own price down. It says nothing about where rent landed. Any house that leased in ten days at asking never appears here at all, which means the whole panel is people who were already waiting.

Some limits:

These are asking rents, not signed leases. It's Memphis city limits only, so no Bartlett, Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, Millington, and nothing across the line in Mississippi. That last part matters more than it sounds, because most "Memphis" rent numbers you'll run into quietly fold the suburbs in, which moves the figure a good deal. It's houses, duplexes and small multifamily, since apartment communities don't list on these platforms. ZIPs under 40 listings aren't shown. And it's one month, July 2026. I'll run it again.

What I'd do with it

If you're about to list a house in Memphis, the question isn't whether your number is close. It's whether you'd rather find out in week one or week six. The people in that second chart weren't unlucky. They listed on a guess, waited, shaved fifty dollars, waited again. Every one of those cycles cost more than the cut did.

Happy to dig into a specific ZIP in the thread. If you own here and want to know what your street is actually asking, post the address and I'll pull it. 

Disclosure: I own a property management company in Memphis and this is our own data. 

LPS Short and Long Term Property Management
0Reply
132 views

1 Reply

Jump to latestLatest
  • Josh HandlerPro Member
    Contractor · Memphis, TN · Member since 2026 · 54 posts · 59 votes
    1mo

    The repeat cutters are the interesting group and I'd offer a different explanation for some of them.

    I'm a contractor here, so I get called after the second or third cut, and what I usually find isn't a pricing problem. It's a condition problem that price is being used to paper over. Owner shaves fifty, nothing happens, shaves fifty again, still nothing, because the thing losing the applicant was never the number. It was smell, or a kitchen that reads worn out, or a front door that sticks. Price is the only lever an out-of-state owner can pull from a laptop, so it's the one they pull, twice.

    That might also explain the thing that broke your correlation. If cut rate tracked affordability you'd expect the cheap ZIPs to lead and they don't. But condition-versus-expectation isn't the same as price. An East Memphis renter paying toward the top of the market has options and a much lower tolerance for a tired unit, so a mediocre house there gets punished faster than the same house in South Memphis where the applicant pool has fewer choices. Higher expectations, not higher rent.

    Two things that would test it if your data can see them. First, do repeat cutters actually lease materially lower than one-and-done cutters, or do they mostly land near where the single cutters ended after sitting three extra weeks? If it's the second, price wasn't the binding constraint. Second, if you can see relists, the units that go dark and come back with new photos are the ones where somebody did work, and I'd bet those clear faster than the ones that only changed the number.

    The line I'd underline for owners is that six weeks of vacancy costs more than the cut. I'd add that it also costs more than the fix. On a $1,300 house six weeks empty is about $1,800, and almost everything on my list of what kills a showing is under $500.

    Happy to be wrong if the data says price. You've got the whole listing panel, I've only got the houses I get called to, which is a biased sample by definition.

    Disclosure, I run a construction company in Memphis and own rentals here, so I'm the guy who benefits if the answer turns out to be condition. Worth saying out loud.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.