Vacancy-to-first-check: the Section 8 number nobody underwrites

Vacancy-to-first-check: the Section 8 number nobody underwrites

James JonesPro Member
Investor · Collierville, TN 38017 · Member since 2017 · 821 posts · 601 votes

Memphis operator here - rentals since 2003, few hundred doors, majority Section 8. My last post about voucher-vs-market tenant quality got operators from four states comparing notes, and one theme kept surfacing that deserves its own thread: the clock between signing a voucher lease and cashing the first HAP payment. It's the least-discussed number in the program, almost nobody underwrites it, and it quietly decides whether your first Section 8 deal feels like genius or disaster.

The anatomy of the gap, because you can't shrink what you can't see. After you accept a voucher applicant, five things happen in sequence: the RFTA packet goes to the authority, the authority schedules an inspection, the unit passes (or doesn't), the HAP contract gets signed, and then your payment starts - often on the authority's batch cycle, not on your lease date. Each stage has its own queue. Stack them and 30-60 days is normal. Fail the inspection once and you can add three to four weeks, because you go to the back of the re-inspection line. An Indianapolis PM with 40 years in the program told me last week their inspection staff is turning over so fast that first-try passes are the single most important variable in his market right now. Mine too.

Where the clock actually leaks, in my experience: incomplete RFTA packets that bounce (submit everything, same day, checked twice); units that get 'mostly ready' and fail on $40 items - a missing GFCI, a handrail, a detector in the wrong spot, peeling paint on anything pre-1978, a water heater TPR line; and inspection scheduling drift you never follow up on. The authority's queue is the authority's queue - but almost half the typical gap is landlord-caused, and that half is free to fix.

What it costs when you get it wrong: two months of holding costs on your rehab loan, plus the tenant you lose. Voucher families have deadlines - a voucher expires if they can't lease up in time. A unit that fails inspection twice can cost you the tenant entirely, and the clock restarts with the next applicant. That failure mode is invisible in every pro forma I've ever been handed.

What I do about it, all of it boring: build every unit to the inspection standard once, during the rehab, so passing is a formality forever after; keep a one-page pre-inspection checklist my crews run before we ever call the authority; know the landlord liaison by name; and track days-per-stage by authority the way other operators track cap rates. My reserves assume 60 days to first payment on every new lease-up. When it comes in at 35, that's a bonus, not a plan.

Questions for the group, and numbers beat adjectives: What's your actual average, lease-signature to first HAP deposit, and in which market? What's your first-try inspection pass rate - and do you even track it? And for anyone who's cut their gap significantly: what was the one change that moved it most?

0Reply
396 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • James JonesPro Member
    OP
    Investor · Collierville, TN 38017 · Member since 2017 · 821 posts · 601 votes
    1mo

    Fair question, Ty - I asked the group for numbers, so here are mine.

    We run in the mid-thirties now, lease signature to first HAP deposit. Before we measured it we were closer to eight weeks, and I'd have guessed four if you'd asked me - which is the real argument for tracking anything at all. My reserves still assume sixty days on every new lease-up, because treating your average as your worst case is how people end up short.

    What moved it, in order of size. Biggest by a mile: a pre-inspection checklist my crews run before we ever call the authority. That's a first-try-pass play, and a failed inspection was costing three to four weeks in the re-inspection queue - so the cheapest week in the whole timeline is the one you spend not failing. Second: submitting the RFTA packet complete, same day, checked twice. Incomplete packets bounce, and a bounce doesn't put you back where you were, it puts you at the end of a line. Third, least glamorous: knowing the authority's payment cycle, because your money can be approved and still wait on a batch date. That one isn't fixable, it's just plannable - and knowing it stops you wasting calls trying to accelerate something nobody can.

    What did NOT move it: chasing people. I spent a year believing the fix was more follow-up calls. It isn't. Nearly all the recoverable time is upstream, in what you hand them and what condition the unit is in when they show up.

    And your multi-PHA point is the real one - my numbers describe a single authority. An operator across three metros is running three rule sets and three clocks, which is exactly where a spreadsheet quietly stops being adequate. Send Tusk over when you want operator eyes on it.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.