I need help

Most Popular Reply

MD/DC · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
2d

I like both. Low fee total stock market index funds for the liquidity, diversification and a true passive investment. Real estate for diversification, something tangible that I can see, touch, watch the neighborhood for growth or decline and for tax advantages. I tend to prefer single family or townhomes in high end neighborhoods for the quality of tenants, likely appreciation and ease of resale. I self managed my LTRs. Keep in mind if you use a property manager it will take a chunk out of your cash flow and give control of tenant procurement and repairs to someone else so important the numbers work and PM is trustworthy.

See this reply in the discussion

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Tim KirkPro Member
    Member since 2026 · 86 posts · 48 votes
    3w

    Are you wanting to be hands on or passive?

    • Member since 2026 · 3 posts · 0 votes
      3w

      I think I'd use a property manager. I think 

  • Investor · Get yourself trained before doing something inadvisable. · Member since 2024 · 3k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    3w
    Quote from @John Lane:

    I have money to invest. Thinking multi family. I have 100,000. The question is - and I know it depends, but could I beat what I get putting my money in a mutual fund tracking the S&P 500?

    The big differences between investing in the stock market and in real estate include

    Stock Market

    You can access the money quickly

    No leverage

    You have little control over growth

    Little involvement

    If the market starts declining your broker will sell high volume customers stocks first

    You might be stuck with a brick

    Real Estate

    Takes time to refinance or sell

    With real estate you can get 4 or 5 houses with splitting up $100,000 using leverage to buy real estate

    You have a huge number of options regarding how involved you want to be

    When the market declines your broker ifs focused on your property

  • Jacob CamhiBusiness Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 131 posts · 40 votes
    2d

    beating the s&p 500 with real estate isn't just about percentage returns; it's about control and the ways you can force value in your investment.

    with $100,000, you're likely looking at a down payment on a small multi-family or as a limited partner in a bigger syndication deal, which is very different from a mutual fund.

    the real estate advantage comes from things like cash flow, the loan principal being paid down by tenants, and the appreciation you can create through good management or renovations.

    that requires active work, whereas the s&p just sits there and grows with the market, so what kind of returns are you aiming for, and have you looked at the local market for small multi-family properties yet?

  • MD/DC · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2d

    I like both. Low fee total stock market index funds for the liquidity, diversification and a true passive investment. Real estate for diversification, something tangible that I can see, touch, watch the neighborhood for growth or decline and for tax advantages. I tend to prefer single family or townhomes in high end neighborhoods for the quality of tenants, likely appreciation and ease of resale. I self managed my LTRs. Keep in mind if you use a property manager it will take a chunk out of your cash flow and give control of tenant procurement and repairs to someone else so important the numbers work and PM is trustworthy.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.