Who really controls a fractional investment?

Question

What rights should a fractional real estate investor never overlook?

When people discuss fractional ownership, a lot of attention goes to the property, the projected returns, and the amount needed to participate.

But I'd argue the legal and governance structure deserves just as much attention.

Depending on how the investment is structured, an investor may own an interest in an entity that owns property, rather than holding a direct deeded interest in the property itself.

That distinction can affect voting rights, distributions, fees, transfer restrictions, access to information, and what happens if the manager wants to sell or refinance.

If you were reviewing a fractional real estate opportunity, which three provisions would you read most carefully before investing?

I'd be particularly interested in what experienced investors look for in the operating agreement and what has caused them to walk away from a deal.

Don Konipol · Answer

“A great property doesn’t necessarily make a great investment if the manager has all the control and investors have very little say or ability to get out.”

I feel exactly the opposite. The outside investor pool contains many people who are not knowledgable or experienced in real estate; aren’t sophisticated investors (despite being “accredited”); and may be driven by personal financial stress. I don’t want people I don’t know “voting” on my money. I know the sponsor (at least somewhat) because I vetted him and wouldn’t have invested unless I trusted his or her judgement. The last thing I want is for a major decision to be derailed by “passive investors gone wild” .

Jay Hinrichs · Answer

And thats great if they follow what the doc's say but when these deals go bad does not matter what the controlling documents say the ones going under tend to just do whatever they have to do to survive or rob peter to pay paul to keep the illusion going.. Bottom line unless your on title as a Beneficiary to a loan or tenant in common on the deed you have no direct control and are at the risk of all the market issues or the GP decisions and discretion. So picking the right GP is the most important thing you can have all the great docs in the world but if the GP goes rouge your still up a creek without your paddle.

Jay Hinrichs · Answer

don same issues with fractionalized loans that are very common in CA.. the state of CA through the DRE who regulates RE brokers that are allowed to make private money loans and to fractionalize them.. finally came out with a controlling document to give investors notice of how these work and the requirements to have a control feature in the case of a foreclosure so you did not have one hold out mucking up the deal.. It happened to me personally in SF back in about 89 I had a loan with multiple bene's and they could not agree ( and it was a second) instead of bringing the first current they just let themselves be wiped out. And sadly 3 years later when the market rebounded they would have made million plus if they had just taken control of the asset at the time. Instead get wiped out for the tune of 250k.

G. Brian Davis · Answer

I’d read the operating agreement before I got too far into evaluating the property. The three things I’d look at first are who controls the major decisions, how distributions and fees are structured, and what happens if the manager wants to refinance or sell. I’d also look closely at voting rights and transfer restrictions. A great property doesn’t necessarily make a great investment if the manager has all the control and investors have very little say or ability to get out. Those details can matter just as much as the projected returns.

Don Konipol · Answer

As a necessity we as managing members have the ultimate decision making authority. A 2/3 majority by ownership stake can replace us as managing members. That has not happened in the 100 + syndications we’ve sponsored since 2013. However, we often will take an informal vote when a major decision is to be made. It’s like an elected government; there’s no vote by the general public except for who to elect.

Michele Balady · Answer

@Don Konipol That's a great realworld example, and it highlights something that I think can easily get overlooked when discussing fractional ownership: the distinction between having an ownership interest and having the practical ability to exercise control over an asset.

Your xperience also makes a strong case for why the legal structure matters just as much as the underlying property. An LLC structure can certainly make decision-making and property disposition more efficient, provided the operating agreement clearly establishes the manager's authority and investor protections.

I'm curious about one other aspect, though... how do you strike the balance between giving the managing member enough authority to make timely decisions and ensuring minority investors aren't left with little meaningful say in major decisions?

I imagine thats one of the most important considerations when structuring a fractional investment.

Don Konipol · Answer

“Fractional ownership” can be divided into two types of ownership; a ownership interest in a real property DIRECTLY or an ownership stake in an entity (LLC, Partnership, Trust or Corporation which in turn owns the real property.

Ownership in real property directly carries greater “power” for the investor even if their rights are somewhat limited by agreement. Especially relevant when major decisions, so as property sale are being contemplated. In an entity structure the manager of the LLC, Board of Director/Officers of a corporation, or general partner of a limited partnership have the power, while whatever power the fractional investor have is encased in the entity documents (operating agreement, corp by laws, or limited partnership agreement.

The problem with direct fractionalized ownership is that it can make taking action cumbersome, delayed, and costly. Here’s areal example and why we moved to the LLC model as syndicators. We had fractionalized ownership of a property with about 13 investors. 12 investors wanted to sell after3 years (at a good profit) while one did not. Although we had an executed agreement drawn up before property purchase that stated a majority of ownership interest would rule and everyone would execute any necessary documents, the lone holdout investor refused to sign the warranty deed for sale of the property. As a result the sale of the property was held up for about 3 months while we needed to get a court order. Using an entity such as an LLC would mean that as long as the operating agreement stated such the manager, or managing member could execute all sale documents.

Who really controls a fractional investment?

Who really controls a fractional investment?

Most Popular Reply

7 Replies