However, I don't think you can go wrong doing it.

. :)The perception of wrong doing is broard and deep, And, for good reason, IMO.

If they are saying there was no wrong doing as far as disclosure on the owner or agent's part, I can't see a good outcome.

And never do things to prove someone wrong, do it to prove to yourself that you can do it.

Hi @David Dachtera,As far as I know the term is "double- close" but I ay be wrong. 

While I have never been nailed for any wrong doing, being in business means you will need to be in a position to fend off any claims by the public. :)

The sign needs to imply wrong doing without being slanderous.

I usually offer no earnest money on my wholesale deals and they go through just fine.If the seller is indeed motivated he/she will not even worry about the earnest money.If you need to offer earnest money you never want to give it directly to the owner, if something goes wrong do you think you will ever see that money again.

However, it may be possible that you could petition the court (chancery, law division, or whatever the proper court/forum is in Indiana) for dissolution and reformation, without the questionable partner.5) No matter what route you take, pull together a list or narrative of all the partner's wrongdoing, with as much detail as possible.

I was just wondering if you guys had any opinions on this and maybe I did something wrong.