5 May 2025 | 13 replies
My niece has immune deficiency and can't be compromised."
6 May 2025 | 224 replies
They are surprised to learn that their contract is woefully deficient and in fact, may not be enforceable unless certain provisions are added.
24 April 2025 | 11 replies
.: I have a house in Toledo, Ohio that I’m trying to get over the line with section 8 inspection.My contractor (who I know and trust) did significant work to ensure the house was up to code.The first scheduled inspection was cancelled by the inspector stating there were too many deficiencies, I endeavoured to reach out for details of the deficiencies but was met with silence and unable to get any info.The second inspection came back with a list of 18 items, some of which I consider petty, such as a small groundhog hole in the backyard.She is also asking for “Front attic window area and front fence needs a full house lead clearance examination by a licensed lead inspector “.
24 April 2025 | 9 replies
I worked for a syndicator in the 80s who got absolutly hammered in dallas tx when a brand new property opened literally across the street from his 20 year old units and offered move in specials etc.. they lost that property to the bank and got sued for millions ( deficiancy)
15 April 2025 | 376 replies
They are not deficient in a single thing, not a 1.
6 April 2025 | 13 replies
Again 95% leverage yields greater risk in general but to present this point another way, I would sleep better signing my name on a $7M loan collateralized against a $10M multi-family property with great occupancy history and good reserves in a A/B location than a $95K loan on a C/D property because I am more likely to be called upon to cover a deficiency with the $100K property.
4 April 2025 | 9 replies
It sure won't impress the sellers to have all of the deficiencies of the property exposed to a sometime, maybe in the future, potential buyer.
31 March 2025 | 48 replies
I believe you can add more healthy years to your life from eating healthy whole foods and drinking water while minimizing vitamin/mineral deficiencies.
2 March 2025 | 32 replies
However, you did provide your cash flow calculation and it clearly was deficient some significant expenses and using your own numbers was not significant cash flow (Assuming that you do not consider $145/month unit with not all expenses included significant cash flow).
22 February 2025 | 5 replies
I would love to simply walk away but TX is a recourse state for deficiency judgements.Buying was a blunder and this has been an expensive lesson.