Generally speaking, it is better to invest locally- you'll have relationships with vendors and contractors, you can meet with them and touch and see the quality of their work, etc. 

This will narrow your OOS gap.My team works with a lot of OOS investors here in Milwaukee and there is definitly a pattern tied to success: narrow the gap as much as you can and also buy a quality property in a desireable neighborhood.

You could still achieve the BRRRR method, it just wouldn't be with a conventional loan.

Such methods are inherently inaccurate so they'll either overstate or understate the reality of the property.

If Crew has elected not to pay invoices due to legitimate business reasons such as quality of workmanship or similar disputes, then explain it here for all to see. 

Further, MSHDA does yearly inspections, and the quality of the inspections are really hit and miss.

There are a million explanations, but rarely do I find something more than an actual method for developing goals other than the "goals depend on markets".

Owners of these are competing with too many better-quality offerings. 

For markets that appreciate in value and rents increase annually those are good quality properties.

In addition to the notice that is on the back of the application regarding "renting as is, no additional cleaning or repairs without written approval of PM" and other caveats, I also explain the actual process, basic factors for approval, the documentation they need to provide, cost and payment method for application and for move in should they be approved.If they have not followed all of the instructions, people with poor attitude and that are non-compliant are not a protected class  under fair housing, and they may be disqualified.