Raw and rookie mistake thinking thatïŠ Thanks on the rental rate assumption and for emphasizing to always err on the conservative side, especially when starting out.

Both good posts above, just a comment on the liability angle of keeping the property "loaned-up".I think this aspect of liability protection is over valued, over used and over emphasized.

The end result would mean kids would all have a better chance at a real education.Also the curriculum that are mandated often emphasizes a broad education over a quality education.

Location was not emphasized enough, IMO.

But I need to emphasize that there are two ways to be a contrarian.

Priming after seals the texture material so the paint lays on top of it, emphasizing the texture, rather than getting soaked into it, flattening the surface.

So when you write, don't emphasize the nature of your business, just that you and your buyers would be greatly aversely affected by the new law.

So when you write, don't emphasize the nature of your business, just that you and your buyers would be greatly aversely affected by the new law.

Also, with the husband, you can emphasize that the wife will not get one dime out of the deal, maybe that will appeal to him (of course he won't either).

Maybe that is all I need.Are there any REITs that hold a set of properties and don't buy and sell, thereby emphasizing cashflow?