Obviously,I chose her, but then back-tested this theorem and it fit nicely.The cons off the top of my head:1.

If it was because of another reason, maybe it makes sense to test the area for 6 months or so and see for your self, this way you will know.

He has a good support system in place including monthly counseling sessions with drug testing.

We have just a couple down there to test things out to see how we like doing the out of state investing thing. 

That would give you more flexibility, but you would have to pay all of the loan costs before even getting into the rehab.It might be worth testing the market as is.

The question of real estate financing was brought up almost immediately after the Act and it didn't meet the test.

I've taken some data from the NAHB 2013, so have a better idea now.

So, about the only con I see is the course work and open book tests you have to suffer through.

Including signatures by the person who didnt turn the reciept in to the office :-)Our main tracking comes from quickbooks where every reciept is recorded, every check, every hud, every loan, basically every piece of financial data.

It's pulling from local public data,  so Zillow results can vary by location.