That makes it difficult to plan capital deployment, especially when running multiple projects at once.2.

Momentum in today’s market seems to favor investors who can deploy capital quickly.

I'm just wondering would investors prefer : - Investing into a land fund that buys particular pieces of land that I identify beforehand, on capital deployed they would earn 7% annually + 10% profit once parcels sell.

I’ve personally deployed over $400M in North Carolina for Blackstone and other large investment groups.Today, I run my own real estate investment program, where we build new-construction homes and sell them up to 90 days before completion with a $30K discount for qualified investors.

That work has taken me across a wide mix of regions and building types, from downtown high rises to suburban mid rise assets, and even some multifamily deployments along the way.I joined BiggerPockets to learn from the investor community and take part in the discussions around office conversions, valuations, leasing velocity, and deal structure.

For example an LP entering into a commitment to provide $10M in equity, deployed through capital calls as deals meet established return criteria (duration, IRR, EM, etc.).

What else is driving successful raises and capital deployment besides obvious answers like track record?

Pull equity, deploy it into the next asset, let both cash flow, then recycle again.

That $5M can be deployed in any fashion the person wants. 

We’re solving the bottlenecks that lawmakers and utilities are worried about:We bring our own energy and our own water.We’re working with advanced submersion-cooling partners so we don’t stress local grids or water supplies (less noisy).Our footprint is more than 50% smaller than traditional centers.Our deployment timeline is six to nine months instead of twelve.We don’t show up asking communities to absorb our load.We show up ready to operate without taking their resources.Louisville is tightening.