They interact with what's already there, and those interactions determine whether a catalyst reinforces, accelerates, or gets absorbed by existing market behavior.Full signal assessment with cap rate implications, market-by-market analysis, and catalyst stacking context available here: https://capratesignals.beehiiv.com/p/data-center-microsoft-m...References & Data NotesCorporate disclosures and public announcements from Microsoft regarding U.S. data center investmentState and local economic development releases related to data center sitingMarket research from CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, and JLL for regional contextIndustry reporting from Data Center Dynamics and Data Center Knowledge We are busting out data centers here in central Ohio!

I would imagine this model appeals to a younger group of people - but is there an age at which individuals don't interact / get along well.  

The uglier the property, the less competition for it and hence, the lower the price.We've got an interactive map on our website that has color-coded the Classes of the 132 Metro Detroit Cities and 183 Detroit Neighborhoods to help investors understand where to invest.DM me if interested in chatting further...

Looking forward to interacting with you all learning together. 

Collectively, they create:Interruptions during the dayDelays that push jobs outHigher costs when vendors have to returnWhat helped was treating vendor interactions the same way we treat tenant screening: clear rules, enforced consistently, before work starts.The concept of a Vendor Compliance Gatekeeper changed how I thought about it.

I am hearing that some are integrating AI to interact with tenants.

A $300–$400/unit CapEx that demonstrably lowers catastrophic loss exposure is much easier to defend than an amenity-driven add-on in workforce housing.The key question lenders and buyers will ask is whether the system is:– Reliable without tenant interaction– Independent of Wi-Fi or resident behavior– Documentable for insurance and underwriting conversationsIf the answer to those is yes, you’re solving a real problem - not a theoretical one.Appreciate you grounding this in actual underwriting reality instead of selling features. 

The more our world shifts into AI and artificial content, the more people will value real human interactions.

Seeing the subtle hints at faith, doesn't mean we should be fooled by wolfs as stated, especially if it's a random Facebook interaction or something of the sort. 

It's not that a resident just becomes a number, rather that you can only retain so many interactions had in a day.Fair Housing is the main point that comes to mind, but I also think that a separate point that Brandon is making is to get in the habit of documenting everything.