Newbie with 203k loan questions

Newbie with 203k loan questions

Clemson, SC · Member since 2017 · 16 posts · 2 votes

Hello everyone! I have a few questions about the 203k loan. My wife and I have found a duplex in our market that we want to purchase for our 1st rental property. It's older and needs a lot of work but has been on the market for over a year and is a prime candidate for purchase price well below market value. The listing price itself is technically already well below. My question is how does the 203k loan works in terms of value appreciation? The listing price is currently 185 but I believe we could get it for 160ish. I think a 40-50k dollar renovation would make this one of the most attractive duplexes in the area. The only surrounding comp I could find on the MLS is currently listed for 550k but is comparable because it's in almost brand new condition. I know they base the loan off of the after rehab value but that seems like a lose of an investor? We're going to be house hacking once the deal is done but am I correct in saying that if the after repair value of the property is deemed to be a conservative 300-350 and we only have 200k into it (150k purchase price and 50k rehab), are we taking a loan out on 300-350 or the 200k we have into it? Lastly if we would be forced to lose the equity by taking the loan on the ARV, what's a good alternative option for financing the rehab separately from purchasing the house? We have some cash but not enough to cover the entire rehab. Thanks in advance to anyone who replies.

0Reply
9 views

1 Reply

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Cleveland, OH · Member since 2015 · 6k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    9y

    @Ashby Tyler Cappelmann, if SOLD comps are anywhere near $550k, this one looks like a slam dunk! But to answer your question, no, the 203k Loan would be ONLY for the amount you need to buy and rehab it, less your (low) deposit. I reckon the the Lender is certainly more likely to loan you the required balance to get you ALL-IN at say $210k if the ARV is likely to be $500k+, than if the ARV is not anticipated to be much different than your all-in cost. Get what I mean?

    The benefit for YOU is that once you've met the owner-occupier residency requirements, you'd have the option of doing a conventional refi, which could get you many more dollars back into your pocket than you started with (so, you could REPEAT)! Provided that each refi @ 70-75% ARV still leaves you with positive cash flow on each rental, THAT'S the concept of "infinite returns"!

    So, you wouldn't be "FORCED to lose the equity by taking the loan on the ARV", you'd WANT to "lose the equity" (ie. borrow against it) - because unused equity can't pay the bills! All the best...

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.