The only thing like that I've heard tell of, is for student rentals. The property management companies around the school charge a "move-in cleaning fee of around $200" IF incoming tenants want the unit professionally cleaned; otherwise the students get unit just like the last tenant left it-- presumably "broom clean" but the stoves are always disgusting.
I have never heard of a move in fee? Does the tenants benefit from this move in fee, are they getting assistance for their move in? In Cleveland, I've never heard of such a thing.
But it’s basically, a charge that is placed upon the newest tenant. Landlord doesn’t have to give it back, landlord doesnt have to HOLD it in “ escrow “
The only thing like that I've heard tell of, is for student rentals. The property management companies around the school charge a "move-in cleaning fee of around $200" IF incoming tenants want the unit professionally cleaned; otherwise the students get unit just like the last tenant left it-- presumably "broom clean" but the stoves are always disgusting.
@Charlie Moore , No. I looked at some early on before we had made a firm decision on the path we wanted to take but we decided to go a different route. We do own 2 side by side 4-unit buildings (all 1 bedroom) that are on the outskirts of the student housing area. About half of our tenants are students but they are all "non-traditional" students with regular year round jobs-- working people. While it can be very lucrative, by the room student rentals and annual turnover are just not for us and we felt that the market around here was over saturated with all the recent development in town.
A move-in fee is typically done instead of a security deposit. The thought is it’s a fee versus a deposit. A security deposit I return minus damage to the unit versus a move-in fee which I keep. In my state the move-in fee cannot be greater than 50% of the monthly rent. Check your state requirements. I prefer a security deposit.
I think the challenge with the move-in fee versus a deposit is that there’s no reason for the tenant to leave the property in the same condition they found it if they paid and upfront fee and do not have any incentive to get any money back not saying it’s OK for a tenant to not leave a property in good condition however there should be some incentive which is the security posit to at least be able to charge them for any damages above where in tear done to the property while they were living there
Every state is different but MA is definitely a tenant friendly state. There's triple damage laws instated for Security Deposits and Last Month's Rent also.
A lot of apartments will only charge move-in fees because they purchase a SURETY bond with that money to cover any damages. This is why the fee is non-refundable. Pretty common in larger properties.
In Chicago, it is very common to have a move-in fee, as high as $500 which is not refundable. New tenants are used to be charge for it everywhere so I implemented it for my rentals.
In the other hand, in Dallas (where I used to live/rent), low deposit of $100-$150 was common practice. As a tenant if I would had anything higher than i would have walked away.
I think move-in fees are market dependent. Also investigate your state laws to find out maximum move-in fees allow. I believe if it is higher than 50% rent, it would become a deposit, at least in IL
What I have seen are HOA's charging move in fees to kind of "discourage" rentals in their association. The fees of course go to the HOA and not to the landlord.
@Charlie Moore I’ve never heard of a move in few. Have you checked your local landlord tenant laws? I know there are laws for how much you can charge on pet deposit and rent deposit. Be sure to have your lease reviewed by a local real estate attorney
@Charlie Moore I’ve never heard of a move in few. Have you checked your local landlord tenant laws? I know there are laws for how much you can charge on pet deposit and rent deposit. Be sure to have your lease reviewed by a local real estate attorney
Hey! many people suggest an attorney, that is a seemingness waste of money
being a landlord, you are already strapped for cash. i Refuse to pay 350.00 for a consultation with a lawyer, when an educational forum almost provides the same thing!
But yes, move in fees! i hate holding security deposits in escrow
People understand that a security deposit is common. You tell people you're going to charge them a half months rent upfront, you're probably going to have higher vacancy rates due to lack of interest, and people are going to view you as a scummy landlord.
It's not common practice in my area and like @Gregory H. was getting at, I feel it's only going to cause more complications with getting your vacancy filled.
In Massachusetts the Security Deposit Law ( M.G.L. c186, s. 15B) and the Statute of Frauds (M.G.L c93A) limits landlords to collecting only first, last, a security deposit up to one month's rent and a key change charge. Any fee beyond that (move-in fees, pet fees or deposit -a pet deposit can be assessed, but only if the sum of it and the security deposit do not exceed one month's rent- amenity fees, application fees) are barred, even if a tenant agrees to pay, is actionable. For example, I'm a tenant and agree to pay a move in fee for an apartment I really want. After signing the lease, I can then turn around and sue the landlord for the amount of the move-in fee and may be eligible for treble (3x!!) damages under the Statute of Frauds. As a real estate agent, I always warn my clients of this, either those listing or those looking for housing.