Forged/Fake Mortgages Recorded Against Property

Forged/Fake Mortgages Recorded Against Property

Investor · Central Valley, CA · Member since 2012 · 6k+ posts · 3k+ votes

A friend here in SoCal called me today about what she called a "title problem". She is in the middle of a refinance on her multi-unit. The lender gets a title report and says that there is already a mortgage, in first position, on the property. Someone recorded a mortgage/deed of trust against the property in 2005 for $225K. In 2006 she had paid off a an old loan originated in 1998 on that parcel, with no refinance activity since. She assumed all this time that it was free and clear. After we confer about possible premature senior memory issues, any outstanding POAs and her divorce which took place in 2004, I look at the the mortgage docs.

It's really a masterful forgery. The loan doc is perfect. So is the deed recorded at the same time that transfers the property from her and her husband's trust to her name only. The only issue is that she stopped using and signing her married name prior to 2005.

So the lender, Secured Bankers Mortgage Corporation, really existed in SoCal back in the day. As did Equity Title, who purportedly prepared the docs and did the escrow/title. SBMC was a wholesale lender and sold loans to Wall Street investors. It doesn't appear that anybody got any funds for this loan as we doubt that any criminal has been making payments for 8 years in order to keep it current. SBMC has been out of business since the Bubble.

So what's the play here? Were lenders such as SBMC in Van Nuys hiring people to work in back rooms with copy machines and notary stamps ordered off the internet? So they could sell fake paper?

More importantly, how are title companies responding to this? Do they have a list of problem and/or fake lenders and will write over/bond over these issues? Or do all the victims have to get quiet title orders from the courts?

0Reply
15 views

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Dion DePaoliPro Member
    Real Estate Broker · Northwest Indiana, IN · Member since 2011 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    13y

    K. Marie Poe, I have seen some of these in the past both private and institutional-ish, we have cured with quiet title suits.

    Unfortunately, there have been some bad operations in the market place overtime with folks doing fraudulent things. In most of the stuff I know of and have seen, the originator was the problem creator with collusion from a title company and the investor simply didn't check the files well.

  • Investor · Central Valley, CA · Member since 2012 · 6k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    13y
    Originally posted by Dion DePaoli:
    K. Marie Poe, I have seen some of these in the past both private and institutional-ish, we have cured with quiet title suits.

    Unfortunately, there have been some bad operations in the market place overtime with folks doing fraudulent things. In most of the stuff I know of and have seen, the originator was the problem creator with collusion from a title company and the investor simply didn't check the files well.

    Dion: when you say the investor didn't check the files, are you referring to the buyer of the loans? Did buyers of wholesale paper usually require a supporting loan application file as part of the due diligence?

    It wouldn't take any collusion from a title company in CA to pull off fake paper such as this. Anyone can find and copy a previously recorded mortgage doc and put in a fake escrow number and send it in for recording.

    Does the owner with a fake loan on title have no choice but quiet title action? In CA the filing fee plus a min. number of attorney hours would still cost a few thousand dollars.

  • Dion DePaoliPro Member
    Real Estate Broker · Northwest Indiana, IN · Member since 2011 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    13y

    By investor, I mean the investor who purchased the paper. Yes, full files were stipulated but in many cases file due diligence was post trade and was done poorly. In new origination, back in the day, there was not a ton of due diligence, it was more like a facet being turned on and off. Loans were pooled, priced and sold and then files were shipped with buyback provision for missing items.

    The title company would be needed to fund the loan. Not sure why anyone would create the instrument for no gain.

    Yes, there is no other solution since you will not be able to get a satisfaction from the mortgagee. Our actions were around $2,500 each. It sucks but there is no other legal way to clear the cloud, that I know of. I tried to see if I could find a POA for the Mortgagee but I couldn't find anything in my couple of mins of looking. The correspondent lenders didn't need to keep trustees around since they didn't/don't actually own anything.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.