Hidden Risks in Your Property Management Agreement

Hidden Risks in Your Property Management Agreement

Stuart UdisPro Member
Attorney · Philadelphia · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes

Property managers often sell owners on separation from tenants, anonymity (which should not be confused with asset protection), compliance & access to more responsive vendors and better vendor pricing. But hiring a PM does not automatically transfer risk. In fact, many management agreements leave the owner bearing nearly all the liability, including liability arising from the PM’s own conduct. Here are several common pitfalls commonly found in PM agreements.

  1. 1. One-sided indemnification. Your agreement likely requires you to defend and indemnify the PM if a claim arises. But does it include reciprocal indemnification requiring the PM to defend and indemnify you when a claim results from its negligence, misconduct, breach of the agreement, or failure to comply with the law?

  2. 2. Your insurance is expected to cover everything. Many agreements require the owner’s general liability policy to be primary, even when the PM caused the loss. The agreement should clearly identify when the PM’s insurance must respond and require the owner to be named as an additional insured on the PM’s policy.

  3. 3. Unchecked authority. Are vendors required to sign written contracts, indemnify the owner, carry adequate insurance, and provide additional insured endorsements before starting work? Does the PM verify licenses, permits, warranties, and completed work documentation, particularly for plumbing, electrical, roofing, and other work capable of causing significant damage?

  4. 4. Inadequate insurance requirements. The agreement may impose detailed insurance requirements on the owner while establishing no minimum limits for the PM’s own general liability, professional liability, cyber, crime, employment practices liability, or workers’ compensation coverage.

  5. 5. An overly broad limitation of liability. Some agreements limit the PM’s liability to a few months of management fees, even when damages result from serious negligence, legal violations, or breach of the agreement.

  6. 6. One-sided survival provisions. The owner’s indemnification obligations survive termination, while the PM’s indemnification, confidentiality, record transfer, claim cooperation, and document preservation obligations do not.

The management agreement determines whether the associated risks were actually transferred or simply handed back to the owner. Review your PM agreement carefully to identify these exposures before a claim forces you to discover them. 

1Reply
175 views

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    1d
    I cannot tell you how many property managers we walked away from at the negotiating table because of the one-sided indemnification clause. Their employee could literally walk up to somebody and assault them and it would be up to us to indemnify them and pay all the legal fees. Of course we did not sign that
    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Stuart UdisPro Member
    OP
    Attorney · Philadelphia · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    23h

    @Chris Seveney Indemnification was listed first because it’s so frequently an issue in PM agreements. I’ve had numerous instances where PM’s tried lecturing me on why it has to be the way it’s drafted and it’s clear they don’t understand how indemnification actually works. In the back of my mind I’m already thinking if they don’t understand why their own contract is not equitable there’s no way they are executing contracts on behalf of clients that look out for their interests

  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    42m

    Great post!

    A BIG hidden risk you missed is short & ambiguous/vague property management contracts!
    - Purchase agreements/contracts are 6+ legal pages with a font size of 6 or 8. They cover a LOT of stuff that protects all parties (buyer, seller, broker(s)).

    We've got a copy of the PMA of one of the largest SFR PMCs in the country and it's only 6 letter pages in 10-font:(

    • This is deliberately done to:
      - Minimize the PMCs liability: if it's not in writing how does an owner hold them accountable to do something?
      - Maximize everything NOT in writing in the PMCs favor: vague => means the PMC can do/charge whatever they want with an owners only remedy being termination or an expensive lawsuit (spend $5k in attorney fees over a $500 disputed charge?).

    Shout-out to @Chris Seveney for helping us tweak our indemnification clause to make it fair to all parties (which was always our intention).

    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ISSUE

    1) The challenge is there are lawsuits that will happen no matter how perfect a PMC is😡
    - We just turned down an owner that wanted us to be liable for everything, including their conduct.

    2) Stuart, still waiting for you to connect me with an insurer that will offer a PMC liability coverage on a property they have no ownership interest in.
    - Again, I've been to ten+ PMC industry conferences with hundreds of vendors and networked with dozens of fellow attending PMC brokers (including industry experts) - and no one has the solution you claim is out there.

    3) Owners do NOT care about this and will prioritize price over liability every time - until a lawsuit happens, and then they want to throw the PMC under the bus.
    - We constantly deal with owners wanting us to use the cheaper contractor they found. This contractor is rarely licensed & insured, and then the owner gets upset when we require them to sign a specific Hold Harmless Agreement and have them pay the contractor directly, so we avoid liability.

    4) PMCs should have proper E&O insurance. Otherwise, see our #2 response above.

    5) Should state a PMC has no protection for willful misconduct or fraud.

    6) Again, a PMC with integrity will handle these via:
    PMC’s Indemnification of Owner: should be limited because after they've been terminated, why would the PMC accept the liability of an owner potentially making the situation worse?

    Confidentiality: a PMC with a broker's license still has to abide

    Record Transfer: what industry gives consumers the ability to access documents forever? We give owners 90-days of free access, then require a fee for our time.

    Claim Cooperation: do you mean lawsuits? Usually the PMC and owner are both sued, so it's in their best interests to work together. Unfortunately, owners often hire their own attorneys who then try to shift 100% of liability to the PMC - so it ends up being, "every man for themself".

    Document Preservation: a PMC with a broker's license has to follow the law.

    ***All of these issues can be avoided by owners having an experienced real estate attorney reviewing a PMC's contract!

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.