Hello @Nick Liu,
Great question. I will attempt to answer it from going through the 2008 crash in the Las Vegas market.
During every market crash, some locations are hurt far worse than others. For example, the current drop in oil prices has hit North Dakota hard but has had little impact on Nevada. The same is true of business sectors within a metro area. Some sectors are hit far worse than others. However, it is hard to determine which are the affected by looking at the gross numbers provided by the news sources.
If you only looked at the unemployment rate and number of foreclosures in Las Vegas during the 2008 through 2014 period, you would expect all Las Vegas investors took a terrible beating. However, our clients reported that rents and time to rent did not change for class A and B properties. When one of our clients asked for specifics we dug into the data. In order to answer her question we analyzed MLS sales and rental data during the period from 2008 to 2014. One of the problems with most data is that it is too "averaged" to be truly useful. We decided to narrow our focus as follows:
• Single family
• 3 bedrooms
• 2 car garage
• 1,200 to 1,500 SqFt
We also restricted the geographical area to the region marked in green below.
Restricting the data to this property profile and area matched the majority of our investor's properties at that time, which are A or B class properties.
We started by exporting data from the MLS for conforming properties that sold or leased between 2008 and 2014. We then computed the average $/SqFt by month and plotted the results as shown in the graph below.

As you can see, the average $/SqFt sales price plunged by almost 50%. What happened to the average $/SqFt rental price? As you can see below, rental rates remained virtually unchanged.

The data showed what our clients were experiencing; A & B class investment properties saw little or no change in cash flow or time to rent during the 2008 to 2014 period. However, C class properties fared badly with vacancy rates exceeding 20% in some areas. We believe that the reason C class properties were disproportionately impacted by the crash has to do with the job sectors in which the different tenant pools worked.
Class C properties in Las Vegas generally rented in the range of $450/Mo. to $700/Mo. and were largely occupied by construction workers and hourly service workers. When construction virtually stopped in 2008, a great many of these people became unemployed and thus the high vacancy rate and falling rents. However, the tenant pool for Class A and B properties (largely casino workers), which generally rented in the range of $1000/Mo. to $1400/Mo., suffered income reductions but comparatively few became unemployed. Even those who lost their homes through foreclosure or short sales still needed a place to live and desired to stay in the same general areas so they became renters.
It is important to consider how the industry/business sectors which employ your target tenant pool are likely to perform during a downturn. We feel this is far more important than observing various purchase "rules" because it does not matter how little you paid for the property if there is no tenant paying the rent. Rental properties are only as good as the jobs in which the tenant pool works.
There is another factor that contributed to the class A and B rental stability in Las Vegas: eviction laws.
Incentives are strong determiners of how people will behave. A great example from history is the survival rate of prisoners transported to Australia during the 1860's. Originally, ship captains were paid a fee for every prisoner that walked onto a ship bound for Australia. Under this incentive program, only about 40% survived the transit. When the incentive changed to being paid for every prisoner that walked off the ship in Australia, the survival rate increased to about 98%.
In some states like California it can take up to one year to evict a non-paying tenant. So, if a tenant is undergoing financial stress, there is little incentive to pay the rent. As one client put it, "In California, tenants pay their bills in the following order: car payment, credit cards and, if they have leftover funds, the rent."
In Las Vegas, a typical eviction takes less than 30 days and costs less than $500. Tenants have a strong incentive to pay the full rent on time or they will be out on the street in less than 30 days. Due to Las Vegas eviction laws we believe that tenants in Las Vegas pay their bills in the following order: car payment, rent and, if they have leftover funds, credit cards.
What about the class C tenant pool? We feel that two factors made the crash very hard for class C property owners. First, if the tenant does not have a job, they can't pay the rent. When construction virtually ended in 2008, so did the related jobs. Second, in our experience, class C tenants tend to be cash based (class A and B tend to be credit based). Cash based tenants have little to fear from evictions and judgements because they carry no financial "history"; what they did in the past has little impact on their present or future. Such cash based tenants have little incentive to pay the full rent on schedule; they can always move to another property.
• You need to buy properties where the tenant pool is credit based and their job pool is likely to be stable even in turbulent economic times.
• Tenants constantly pay rent only when there is a strong incentive to do so. Do local eviction laws incentivize paying the rent or do they have the opposite effect?
@Nick Liu, arguably, that's one of the main reasons why BP heavily recommends buying properties for LESS than current market value (eg. the 70% rule - includes rehab costs). First off, if you don't, then the Lenders won't let you cash out enough each time to make BRRRR viable in the first place. And that applies to EVERY property you buy, so that at any given moment, no matter how many hundreds of thousands of dollars you owe your Lender, you should STILL have at least 30% equity on every property.
If the world drops in value by more than 30% - we're ALL in trouble! (But you will only be out of pocket your original 20% deposit on that first deal of yours)!
You're missing the most important part of all of this...you'r buying at a discount, and you have a tenant paying rent. Why would you get foreclosed on? Just because you may be upside down in your mortgage, makes no difference. If your tenant pays, you pay, and there's no foreclosure...in fact, in most downturns, rents go up as well as the number of tenants.
@Joe Villeneuve in the great GFC mass foreclosures were a result of tenants not paying in many markets... and under capitalized and underwater owners.. defaulted with many ruining their credit for years because they did not realize that they needed substantial reserves to handle vacant properties... then you add in the areas were vacant properties get trashed and stripped then there was no hope for the owners.
If you look at most homes that you buy today.. at least 50% of them are failed landlords that walked... this is true all through the mid west.
So one needs to not just think that if there is a melt down again everyone becomes renters this did not play out that way last time... many left the area ( think PhX Vegas) Many ended up moving in with family... etc etc.
@Joe Villeneuve in the great GFC mass foreclosures were a result of tenants not paying in many markets... and under capitalized and underwater owners.. defaulted with many ruining their credit for years because they did not realize that they needed substantial reserves to handle vacant properties... then you add in the areas were vacant properties get trashed and stripped then there was no hope for the owners.
If you look at most homes that you buy today.. at least 50% of them are failed landlords that walked... this is true all through the mid west.
So one needs to not just think that if there is a melt down again everyone becomes renters this did not play out that way last time... many left the area ( think PhX Vegas) Many ended up moving in with family... etc etc.
If there is another Great Meltdown, it will affect everyone...but with the right market generating high enough cashflow to lower rents and still cashflow if needed...and as you say, "the substantial cash reserves" on hand, any hard economic drop can be met.
I weathered it, and many that were in the same markets (or type of markets) as myself did too. Many that were in my market also did not make it...but they were buying incorrectly from the start. Most of them were "banking" on building up equity as their main or only returns. In other words, they were banking on future events they had little or no warning or control over.
I have at least 25% equity in my properties, and at least enough cash flow to cover the "fall backs" in a down market. I planned for both present, and future, with enough risk controls in place (i.e. cash reserves, etc...) to cover my tail.
@Joe Villeneuve I hear ya... . 25% equity can go poof.
I made loans on really nice 10 year old homes in Atlanta that were worth 140ish I made what I thought was great loans at 60 to 65% LTV>. by the time I foreclosed on them had them back they were selling in the mid 30's to 40 s.. values can and did drop 50 to 80% in many markets in the down turn.. happened in Detroit for various reasons. the homes folks are buying for 20 to 40k now in Detroit and rehabbing I was loaning 70 to 80k on them in 04. and that was 60% LTV then..
So in my mind those that made it through were Extremely well capitalized or like many of my clients they own their rentals free and clear.. and they take the abuse of others telling them they are nuts to not leverage up.. LOL.
Hopefully though we won't see another event like that one.. but for all those reasons I own NO rentals will never own any and will always just stay in cash and very short term debt. that way I can limit my loss's extremely quickly. but I am an old dude and landlording is just too much work for me.. .If I was young I would be sitting in Detroit buying every low end rental for cash I could buy and keep growing the portfolio..
@Joe Villeneuve I hear ya... . 25% equity can go poof.
I made loans on really nice 10 year old homes in Atlanta that were worth 140ish I made what I thought was great loans at 60 to 65% LTV>. by the time I foreclosed on them had them back they were selling in the mid 30's to 40 s.. values can and did drop 50 to 80% in many markets in the down turn.. happened in Detroit for various reasons. the homes folks are buying for 20 to 40k now in Detroit and rehabbing I was loaning 70 to 80k on them in 04. and that was 60% LTV then..
So in my mind those that made it through were Extremely well capitalized or like many of my clients they own their rentals free and clear.. and they take the abuse of others telling them they are nuts to not leverage up.. LOL.
Hopefully though we won't see another event like that one.. but for all those reasons I own NO rentals will never own any and will always just stay in cash and very short term debt. that way I can limit my loss's extremely quickly. but I am an old dude and landlording is just too much work for me.. .If I was young I would be sitting in Detroit buying every low end rental for cash I could buy and keep growing the portfolio..
Love it. Markets, Personalities, Age (I too have been around for a while...with a birthday coming up still this month), goals, financial situations both current and changing, are just a few things that push/pull all of us in the direction(s) we take.
I talk about leverage, but that is only a part of an overall plan. In the end, I want my money never spent...only used, and I want my profits, to buy with no leverage...or at least none until I require it. The leverage isn't and end goal, it's a means to the end goal...and without it, I feel you just spin your wheels.
Joe Villeneuve & Jay Hinrichs ,
Great discussion, I think I have a much better picture now. Sounds like there's Isn't a silver bullet that'll guaranteed which side the balance is going to tip when economy is unstable. I'll create a model to run some analysis on different scenarios to determine a acceptable loss for myself. I definitely would like to keep 50% of what I owned if things do go side ways, which means controlling optimal reserve is the key in this equation.
Be careful how much (of how little) you put into your cash reserves. Too much, and you defeat the purpose of REI. Too little, and REI may defeat you.
Very good point Brent Coombs , I did not thought about the limited input. So if all hell broke loose, all I'm losing would be the original 20% + time + Headache + Uncalculated rehab cost, which is still somewhat a acceptable loss in my current stage in life. Not that I'm planing on loosing it, I'm just planing for the worst before starting to dive in.
Providing you've a good team around you (knowledgeable/reliable/fair Contractor/s and Property Manager/s) and your analysis skills are bada bing, bada boom, then even the "Headache and Uncalculated rehab cost" won't ensue. All the best. Cheers...
I was landlording throughout the great recession in Indy, and never really had much in the way of vacancy.
Actually found that people were renting longer than they would in a good economy, where a lot of renters would become buyers.
Values clearly fell, but rents did not really change.
I do think the really low income areas likely struggled, but middle income areas were not a problem, at least locally for me.
I certainly wouldn't invest or not based upon some fear of what might happen 5 years from now.
Simple; Like a friend of mine does. Just reduce rent to the lowest in the market, and absorb less profits. Folks still need a place to live and yours will become popular with less than market rent prices.
Joe Villeneuve & Jay Hinrichs ,
Great discussion, I think I have a much better picture now. Sounds like there's Isn't a silver bullet that'll guaranteed which side the balance is going to tip when economy is unstable. I'll create a model to run some analysis on different scenarios to determine a acceptable loss for myself. I definitely would like to keep 50% of what I owned if things do go side ways, which means controlling optimal reserve is the key in this equation.
Put your reserves into the purchase of your properties, have smaller mortgages and set your sights a lot higher > keeping 100% of what you own. People in real estate who have so much leverage that they would lose 50% of their holdings aren't investing they are speculating.
Hello @Nick Liu,
Great question. I will attempt to answer it from going through the 2008 crash in the Las Vegas market.
During every market crash, some locations are hurt far worse than others. For example, the current drop in oil prices has hit North Dakota hard but has had little impact on Nevada. The same is true of business sectors within a metro area. Some sectors are hit far worse than others. However, it is hard to determine which are the affected by looking at the gross numbers provided by the news sources.
If you only looked at the unemployment rate and number of foreclosures in Las Vegas during the 2008 through 2014 period, you would expect all Las Vegas investors took a terrible beating. However, our clients reported that rents and time to rent did not change for class A and B properties. When one of our clients asked for specifics we dug into the data. In order to answer her question we analyzed MLS sales and rental data during the period from 2008 to 2014. One of the problems with most data is that it is too "averaged" to be truly useful. We decided to narrow our focus as follows:
• Single family
• 3 bedrooms
• 2 car garage
• 1,200 to 1,500 SqFt
We also restricted the geographical area to the region marked in green below.
Restricting the data to this property profile and area matched the majority of our investor's properties at that time, which are A or B class properties.
We started by exporting data from the MLS for conforming properties that sold or leased between 2008 and 2014. We then computed the average $/SqFt by month and plotted the results as shown in the graph below.

As you can see, the average $/SqFt sales price plunged by almost 50%. What happened to the average $/SqFt rental price? As you can see below, rental rates remained virtually unchanged.

The data showed what our clients were experiencing; A & B class investment properties saw little or no change in cash flow or time to rent during the 2008 to 2014 period. However, C class properties fared badly with vacancy rates exceeding 20% in some areas. We believe that the reason C class properties were disproportionately impacted by the crash has to do with the job sectors in which the different tenant pools worked.
Class C properties in Las Vegas generally rented in the range of $450/Mo. to $700/Mo. and were largely occupied by construction workers and hourly service workers. When construction virtually stopped in 2008, a great many of these people became unemployed and thus the high vacancy rate and falling rents. However, the tenant pool for Class A and B properties (largely casino workers), which generally rented in the range of $1000/Mo. to $1400/Mo., suffered income reductions but comparatively few became unemployed. Even those who lost their homes through foreclosure or short sales still needed a place to live and desired to stay in the same general areas so they became renters.
It is important to consider how the industry/business sectors which employ your target tenant pool are likely to perform during a downturn. We feel this is far more important than observing various purchase "rules" because it does not matter how little you paid for the property if there is no tenant paying the rent. Rental properties are only as good as the jobs in which the tenant pool works.
There is another factor that contributed to the class A and B rental stability in Las Vegas: eviction laws.
Incentives are strong determiners of how people will behave. A great example from history is the survival rate of prisoners transported to Australia during the 1860's. Originally, ship captains were paid a fee for every prisoner that walked onto a ship bound for Australia. Under this incentive program, only about 40% survived the transit. When the incentive changed to being paid for every prisoner that walked off the ship in Australia, the survival rate increased to about 98%.
In some states like California it can take up to one year to evict a non-paying tenant. So, if a tenant is undergoing financial stress, there is little incentive to pay the rent. As one client put it, "In California, tenants pay their bills in the following order: car payment, credit cards and, if they have leftover funds, the rent."
In Las Vegas, a typical eviction takes less than 30 days and costs less than $500. Tenants have a strong incentive to pay the full rent on time or they will be out on the street in less than 30 days. Due to Las Vegas eviction laws we believe that tenants in Las Vegas pay their bills in the following order: car payment, rent and, if they have leftover funds, credit cards.
What about the class C tenant pool? We feel that two factors made the crash very hard for class C property owners. First, if the tenant does not have a job, they can't pay the rent. When construction virtually ended in 2008, so did the related jobs. Second, in our experience, class C tenants tend to be cash based (class A and B tend to be credit based). Cash based tenants have little to fear from evictions and judgements because they carry no financial "history"; what they did in the past has little impact on their present or future. Such cash based tenants have little incentive to pay the full rent on schedule; they can always move to another property.
• You need to buy properties where the tenant pool is credit based and their job pool is likely to be stable even in turbulent economic times.
• Tenants constantly pay rent only when there is a strong incentive to do so. Do local eviction laws incentivize paying the rent or do they have the opposite effect?
@Eric Fernwood good points.. .the area you outlined is one of the most affluent in the entire Vegas area.. I know I have been shopping for a second home there. LOL.. most investors probably would not have bought there because the returns would have looked to low compared to other markets in the country... but as you point out you mitigate risk with the proper property to start.
Much like what happened in the Portland market.. not a hot bed for most investors to buy rentals other than savvy locals or CA folks. but in the down turn the rental market held well here.. there were still some foreclsoures etc.. but all in all the upper end held.. but those proeprties were bought with 3 to 5 caps in the beginning.
@Eric Fernwood Great post and a lesson in actual location. White collar tenanted areas, even during GFC, unemployment was still very low. Some top tier areas were hardly affected. Santa Monica median 850k top of market 2007 and bottom 2011 825k. Today 1.4 mil. I think rents went up during the whole GFC.
In any business you must have cash reserves. The trick is having enough cash and still being able to run your business the most profitably. That means you have some cash in reserves and some cash is working capital.
Nick,
You should maximize the redundancy in your plan/process/finances. Buying below replacement costs is one layer of redundancy, large down payments to keep your payments low is another, large cash reserves, geographic diversification, other sources of income, etc. etc. all add layers of redundancy.
Depending on how you count, on average, there has been a recession every 5 years since 1790 in the US. So we should neither be afraid, nor surprised by the next recession, but we can be prepared.
Evan
@Evan Bellingar real estate tends to go in 10 year cycles 5 is a little tight.
but no one save a few ( watch movie big short) really saw the 08 melt down coming or thought it would be such a global disaster as it was....
Were ORegon got hurt the most was in Construction... in from 1992 to 2007 there were an average of 12,000 doors being built in the metro area. that slowed in 08 and by 09 there was a grand total of 700 permits pulled... construction financing had froze .. and a great many in the trades went bankrupt lost their homes and are just now pulling out.. Some very big ORegon names had to totally restructure..
Some of this trickled down to rentals and Multi.. I sold quite a few and bought a few plex's that the owners had walked from .. Because their tenants were in the trades and left.
And other area's it was cataclysmic in the meltdown.. did not matter what you owned.