Spring, TX · Member since 2016 · 23 posts · 2 votes
Hi biggerpockets, I'm a new landlord trying to put my first house up for rent. What kind of pictures do you think I should use? Do I need a $500 professional package, or can I just use my smartphone camera?
Unless you are in an area DESPERATE for tenants, or you have a bad property that is hard to rent, smart phone pics will be MORE THAN sufficient.
Check out your competition on craigslist. 99% of the pictures are of poor quality and/or misleading. This includes listings by realtors and other professionals.
@Charles Jessup if you want to rent quickly then make sure that you spend enough to get a good photographer that can show the property in the best way. The best thing to do is find a friend that does photography as a hobby and has the equipment and knowledge necessary to get good pictures, pay them $50 to take professional grade pictures, and then to edit them for the best layout. You will probably find that $50 will be worth it because of the demand it will create.
I am a professional RE photographer. Don't use a buddy. Someone who photos families won't have the gear or experience to photo a home. Find someone in your area and pay the money to have it done right. You might spend around $100-$150. If the unit is vacant, make sure to ask if you can use the images again and again - each time you list it - that way your money will go farther. You will also get nice exterior photos, maybe even of the surrounding neighborhood/street. The caliber of renters you will attract with pro-photos are going to be higher. It makes you look better as a landlord, too. win win.
Good pictures do help. But set a budget for about $25-45. Consider that you will use the same pictures for the next three times the property is vacant.
To find the right photographer I usually ask for a referral from a local real estate agent. With my house flip I knew my agent had the best of the best in photographers so it was a no brainier.
With the rentals I have a little trick. I goto street easy and Zillow and I look at a bunch of ads. Whatever broker has the best photographer I call up and give them the exclusive. Making sure they have access to that photographer.
Unless you are in an area DESPERATE for tenants, or you have a bad property that is hard to rent, smart phone pics will be MORE THAN sufficient.
Check out your competition on craigslist. 99% of the pictures are of poor quality and/or misleading. This includes listings by realtors and other professionals.
Wow, this was a huge response! Thanks biggerpockets community for sharing your knowledge and experience.
It’s obvious that people’s experiences differ a lot on this topic. This helped me get a ballpark idea of what other people are paying, so I appreciate everyone who responded. I'm an analytical guy so I made a graph of what people said they would pay:
Since 6/8 responses said to use a professional, I'm going to do that. If anyone knows a good photographer in the north Houston area, let me know.
@Account Closed why be like the other 99%? Wouldn't you want to stand out in the crowd? I'd like to see your photos! Here are mine so you can compare: http://www.houzz.com/pro/charlotte-trusty/trusty-r...
For the record, it IS hard to photograph houses. It takes technical skill, education and training, a keen eye and a ton of gear and software.
@Account Closed why be like the other 99%? Wouldn't you want to stand out in the crowd?
Depends on the area I guess. I have people begging for spaces. No reason to spend extra money on marketing when I have so many applicants beating at my door.
I drop about $80 for professional shot, though I don't do it for all of them. (There is no question that they are much better than anything I could do.) In my market, it is by no means necessary, but I like to have some professional shots because (1) it does drum up the rental demand even more; and (2) I like having them for my portfolio to show to bankers, partners, etc. Showing money sources professional photographs of your recent projects definitely makes you stand out, in my opinion.
@Charles Jessup I pay $170 for a professional to take photos of my sales listings. I take my own rental listing photos, but I also have decent equipment a little bit of knowledge to be able to do so.
Professional photos for a rental may be necessary in other markets, but I have been in the Houston market for over 10 years and never used anything more expensive than a cellphone picture. It's more about pricing and location. Get that right and you won't need any pictures at all. ☺
I have a photo and design background, and take them with a compact cam that has a wider than average lens. For most listings, you'd be FAR better off posting a ton of DIY pics and investing your money in someone doing a clear floor plan drawing. Too often photos can't convey the plan, and it eliminates a lot of showings to people for whom the layout is a problem. The one below I did, it's not to architectural spec, but it gives the needed info, particularly combined with the photos.
Don't waste your money on the pretty pictures. For every rental property I manage, I get by with cell phone pics. And I've never had a rental on the market more than a couple of weeks.
Having said that, make sure the pics are nice. Don't take pics on a dark and cloudy day. Wait for a sunny day. Clean up any clutter, etc.
I've seen some God-awful pics on MLS listings. Just ran across this one today....