Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Test dialog goes here

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,284
Posts
231
Votes
Scott W.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • chicago, IL
231
Votes |
1,284
Posts

Rent Guarantee to get 1st year month-to-month lease

Scott W.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • chicago, IL
Posted

I read something recently where a landlord provides a rent guarantee certificate listing the amount & the length of time (usually a year) & then creates a month-to-month. He strongly urges this concept (he has thousands of properites).

The #1 reason renters do not want to sign a month-to-month 1st year lease, he says, is because they're afraid the rent will be increased within the 30 days. This alleves their concerns.

The landlord can terminate the lease if the tenant doesn't pay or acts up. The downside is, so can the tenant.

But given today's landlord market, your worst enemy is an eviction, especially in states where they can be drawn out.

What do you think?

Loading replies...