House Bill 2430-Lift Ban on rent control

House Bill 2430-Lift Ban on rent control

Investor · NW Indiana · Member since 2012 · 833 posts · 197 votes

Hello BP, I guess this would be the proper place to post this.  I was hoping maybe there would be a more specific spot we could put only Bills/Laws etc...that would be effecting our states.  

I received the following:

- Illinois REALTORS strongly opposing HB 2430.  It repeals the Rent Control Preemption Act, an initiative of the REALTORS back in 1997 that prohibits local governments from enacting rent control measures.

-The sponsor and supporters of the bill have stated that they want the City of Chicago to be able to impose Rent Control in Chicago. But the repeal of the Preemption Act would allow, at a minimum, ALL home rule units in the state to impose Rent Control.

Rent control is widely discredited by many if not most economists, and many housing advocates. Rent Control is destructive and counterproductive in many ways, is very complicated to administer, and would have many unintended consequences.

Here are just a few of the concerns we have with allowing communities to impose Rent Control:

Rent Control is a complete disincentive to investment in rental property. It obviously caps the return on investment for rental property, and when you cap the costs than can be recovered, you’re going to get less of it – in this case, rental property.

§ It’s mind-boggling that after what we’ve been through in the housing market since 2008, that Illinois would consider a bill that sends the message, “We don’t want to develop, rehabilitate, or improve our housing stock.” In our view, that’s the message this bill sends.

In addition to drying up investment in rental property, one of the worst effects of Rent Control is that it discourages property owners from maintaining and upgrading their property. Regulatory costs, property taxes, and costs for services will continue to rise, but the owner’s rental revenue will remain stable, leaving a shrinking pool of funds available for maintenance and improvement.

§ Property taxes and other fees and regulations placed on rental property owners are already very high, and are rising faster than rent increases in many cases. Out of control property taxes and regulations are a big factor in the upward pressure on rents – and yet these costs aren’t capped, only the income from the property is capped.

§ Chicago in particular, which already is facing extreme financial distress, stands to lose untold millions in property tax revenue, as rental property values will certainly drop if their potential earnings are capped.

§ We can only imagine the morass of bureaucracy it will take to administer Rent Control, and it may encourage an illegal black market in Rent Controlled units.

§ In short, HB 2430 is exactly what Illinois DOESN’T need, especially now. More regulatory over-reach that tells investors, “We don’t want you.”

4Reply
42 views

Most Popular Reply

Investor · Decatur, IL · Member since 2015 · 25 posts · 8 votes
9y

I think the entire state of Illinois shouldmutiny until new politicians and politics are implemented, until then I'd stop investing in Chicago, once the money finally stops coming in will change actually come. 

See this reply in the discussion

9 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Decatur, IL · Member since 2015 · 25 posts · 8 votes
    9y

    I think the entire state of Illinois shouldmutiny until new politicians and politics are implemented, until then I'd stop investing in Chicago, once the money finally stops coming in will change actually come. 

  • Westmont, Illinois (IL) · Member since 2016 · 53 posts · 15 votes
    9y

    This would be bad. Let's take action! I just signed  this:   call for action

    i got the link from this article: article

  • Chicago, IL · Member since 2016 · 61 posts · 11 votes
    9y

    Thanks for Sharing. I never would have know.

    Best Wishes

    Aaron.

  • Real Estate Agent · Geneva, IL · Member since 2015 · 403 posts · 172 votes
    9y

    Realtors are being encouraged to sign the petition opposing this bill. I am not sure why Illinois thinks they can effectively run another control on it's residents.

  • Flipper/Rehabber · Crown Point, IN · Member since 2009 · 482 posts · 216 votes
    9y

    Illinois is so far in debt, that not only will it cripple the rental market, but I believe it will also lead to vacant homes, which lowers the tax base. You guys voted these clowns into office, not us!  But this is EXACTLY why I tell investors to start buying in Indiana. We're 35 minutes from downtown Chicago and taxes are far less, housing acquisition costs are less and Indiana is a landlord friendly state. Anything I missed?  :)

    I will also sign it. 

  • Chicago, IL · Member since 2016 · 9 posts · 5 votes
    9y

    @Yulia J. I was unable to sign, do you have a current link?

  • Investor · Avon, IN · Member since 2016 · 57 posts · 16 votes
    9y

    Illinois is so screwed up.  Until they lop off the city of chicago from the rest of the state, it will never change.  It is a Democrat controlled state, PERIOD, due to Chicago.  The state needs to move ALL government activity back to Springfield.  But we are just wishful.  Someday it will change...not.

  • Westmont, Illinois (IL) · Member since 2016 · 53 posts · 15 votes
    9y

    @Dustin Albers, sorry it doesn't work for you. The links still work for me. Try to go to this short article, there is a link there "call for action" http://chicagoeviction.com/2017/03/landlords-control-coming/

  • Fresno, CA · Member since 2015 · 552 posts · 181 votes
    9y

    I hope you guys win. 

    Here's some economic and Urban development studies/ articles you can share with your politicians. 

    Hey could you share this with Lena as well.

    Almost every Urban Planning and economist organization agrees that rent controls hurt local governments/cities:
    Most economists agree that rent controls mess up big cities and MAKE LESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING in the long run

    Almost 95% of economist say it's bad for local communities in the long run. It's a short term Band-Aid that usually helps middle-upper class long term tenants, not the truly poor/needy. Eventually the cheapest units get taken off market

    Here are some articles on Urban development, economists that are bi-partisan. This issue is like global warming. All the experts are in agreement!:

    Recent Beacon study on economics. From Urban Institute, to Business Insider Mag, to The Economist all have same result. IN FACT 95% of economists:

    This is one by "The Economist" which is a popular economy magazine:

    A housing/planning and urban development website:

    Foundation for Economic Education:

    Business Insider:

    CEI:

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.