The future of Austin metro without Chapter 313 tax incentives..

4 Replies | Austin, Texas

It will expire at the end of next year and was not renewed by Texas State Legislature, recently. In a nutshell, Chapter 313 allows a school district to offer a cap of up to 10 years-between 10 and 100 million of the taxable property value of new manufacturing or renewable energy projects. It helped to bring Tesla and Samsung to the Austin metro. Samsung got approved for it by Manor ISD in 2005 and 2012 which spurred massive development in the northeast quadrant of the city. Del Valle ISD approved it for Tesla and will save Tesla approximately 50 mil over 10 years.  

What does that mean? The Austin metro will have less of a competitive advantage for big corporations to move to the metro after 2022. That has been a card that the metro has been playing for decades. Very interesting! 

Texas State Congress is supposedly reconvening for a special session but is unlikely to consider this case. 

Only time will tell of the consequences. 

Updated about 1 month ago

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/news/2021/06/14/chapter-313-incentives-ending-in-2022.html?cx_testId=40&cx_testVariant=cx_21&cx_artPos=8#cxrecs_s

Hi Aaron,

 An interesting topic. I've always wondered how much of an "incentive" these tax breaks really are to corporations. Tesla, as you note, received $46.4MM in tax breaks from Del Valle but is that what really attracted them to Austin for their $1+ billion facility? If they had not been offered the incentive would they have gone elsewhere? I am suspicious of the idea that the tax break is the driving factor for a company to consider Austin. If that were the case the companies would post an RFP on their website and let all states and counties participate in an auction of sorts. Of course, no companies do that because their primary focus is the local labor pool, proximity to customers/suppliers, educational system and so on. So my personal feeling is that companies often dangle the idea that they might go elsewhere to get more incentives (who wouldn't use that negotiation tactic?) when the decision has mostly been made internally. I am not an economist and have no background in how incentives work but I don't think letting Chapter 313 incentives lapse will take Austin off the table for many companies who see the myriad other benefits the Austin metro offers. 

@Chris Schorre my understanding is that most cities offer tax incentives of sorts for large and large-ish companies to relocate to their city. Thereby stimulating the local economy and increasing the local work force. And this is whether or not there is an extended RFP sent out.

@Chris Schorre Those tax incentives matter. According to the article, in 2019 Samsung paid 5.35 mil in property taxes but requested reimbursement for 3.85 mil. People move due to taxes. One of the reasons why there is a migration to Austin, and Texas for that matter, from elsewhere is no state income tax. I have a buddy who recently moved completely out of Oakland California completely due to their heavy handed policies and sold her airbnb money maker. Businesses will also move due to taxes. Tesla was trying to flee the heavy handed governmental policies from California. Del Valle and Travis County said thank you with a big tax break.