Any landlords use Lease Defend website to screen potential tenants?

Question

Saw an Instagram post where a long time landlord recommends using a tenant screening website called Lease Defend. It uses information from potential tenants bank account that verifies the tenants reported income and also gives a score that tells the Landlord how good of a renter the applicant would be using bank information that the landlord cannot have access to. Since it uses direct information it supposedly can't be fraudulent due to bogus paystubs or bank statements and is encrypted for applicant safety.

I am considering using it but am finding little information on users experience with it. Anyone with experience using this screening website?

Rosina Persaud · Answer

Troy, both — the channel matters less than what we are checking. Our standard is verified, repeatable income: recurring deposits over 60 to 90 days that match the pay stubs on employer, amount, and timing. A bank-linked pull is faster and harder to fake, so it is our first choice. But plenty of good applicants will not link an account, so we accept full statements — unedited, all pages — and run the same check by hand. What we never accept is a pay stub standing alone. And whatever path an applicant takes, the standard is written down and identical for everyone. The tool changes. The test does not.

Troy L. · Answer

Thanks for your reply! Do you have potential renters match their pay stubs with an open bank account screen to verify them or do you let them give you paper bank account statements?

Rosina Persaud · Answer

Haven't used Lease Defend specifically, so I can't review the product. But the approach is exactly right, and it's how we screen across 236 doors in Memphis.

Pay stubs are trivially faked — we stopped treating them as proof years ago. What we actually verify: repeatable income, and consistency between the story and the paperwork. Bank-statement verification gets at both, because recurring deposits don't lie the way a PDF pay stub does. The claimed income has to line up with the employer name, the deposit amounts, and the timing. One-off large deposits that match nothing get questioned, not counted.

Two honest caveats on any tool like this. First, no verification is fraud-proof — tools reduce fraud, they don't eliminate it. Second, watch your completion rate. The best screening tool in the world is worthless if applicants abandon it halfway, so we track how many started applications actually finish.

Don't buy the tool for the score. Buy it for the verification underneath.

Troy L. · Answer

According to the website they do pretty comprehensive background checks including eviction and criminal but don't see anything regarding bankruptcy. Site does audit rent and utility bills with length of time paid. Looks like site wouldn't work well with # 3,4,5,7,8. Thanks for your reply.

Drew Sygit · Answer

RentButter has similar approach.

CHALLENGES:

1) Doesn't appear they do a full background check

2) Would want to know how they check Criminal and Eviction histories as many courts no longer report to bureaus.

3) What happens if relatively new bank account?

4) What happens if applicant has more than one bank account?

5) What happens if applicant doesn't doesn't consistently use their bank account to pay rent, or utilities, or???

6) What about bankruptcies?

7) What about collection balances owed to other landlords and utilities?

8) What about credit card, auto, etc. payments?

Seems they've simplified the screening process - which may work for Class A, maybe Class B tenants, but NOT Class C or D!

Troy L. · Answer

According to the website it confirms income and uses your rental price to give a income vs rent score. They also do eviction and criminal background checks. I agree some people won't want to link their bank but if you make one person do it you have to screen them all that way.

Hossein Sharifi · Answer

I can't speak to Lease Defend specifically, but bank-linked income verification in general does catch most fake paystubs. Two things I'd check before relying on it.

First, the score. Ask what goes into it. If it works like a consumer report, you need to apply your criteria the same way to every applicant and send an adverse action notice when you deny someone because of it.

Second, plenty of good applicants won't link their bank. Keep a fallback, like two months of statements plus an employer call, so you're not turning away qualified people.

I'd still run credit and eviction history alongside it. Income verification tells you they can pay, not whether they do.

Ming Yi · Answer

I have not used Lease Defend, so I cannot review the product itself. But I can speak to the approach, because bank-statement income verification is exactly the direction screening should go. Pay stubs are trivially faked, and I have caught doctored ones more than once, so I stopped treating them as proof years ago.

What I do now: every adult applicant submits 2 to 3 months of bank statements, and I check actual recurring deposits against the income they claimed. Consistency across sources is what matters. The statements have to line up with the employer name, the deposit amounts, and the timing. One-off large deposits that do not match anything get questioned, not counted.

Two caveats on any tool in this space. First, no verification is fraud-proof, tools reduce fraud, they do not eliminate it. Second, the best screening tool is worthless if applicants abandon the process, so I watch completion rate as closely as price per applicant.

The category is right. Vet the specific tool on cost, applicant friction, and how it handles joint accounts.

Troy L. · Answer

Thanks for your reply Ming. My only concern is that bank statements can be fraudulently generated using ai.

Any landlords use Lease Defend website to screen potential tenants?

9 Replies