Hidden Risks in Your Property Management Agreement

Hidden Risks in Your Property Management Agreement

Stuart UdisPro Member
Attorney · Philadelphia · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes

Property managers often sell owners on separation from tenants, anonymity (which should not be confused with asset protection), compliance & access to more responsive vendors and better vendor pricing. But hiring a PM does not automatically transfer risk. In fact, many management agreements leave the owner bearing nearly all the liability, including liability arising from the PM’s own conduct. Here are several common pitfalls commonly found in PM agreements.

  1. 1. One-sided indemnification. Your agreement likely requires you to defend and indemnify the PM if a claim arises. But does it include reciprocal indemnification requiring the PM to defend and indemnify you when a claim results from its negligence, misconduct, breach of the agreement, or failure to comply with the law?

  2. 2. Your insurance is expected to cover everything. Many agreements require the owner’s general liability policy to be primary, even when the PM caused the loss. The agreement should clearly identify when the PM’s insurance must respond and require the owner to be named as an additional insured on the PM’s policy.

  3. 3. Unchecked authority. Are vendors required to sign written contracts, indemnify the owner, carry adequate insurance, and provide additional insured endorsements before starting work? Does the PM verify licenses, permits, warranties, and completed work documentation, particularly for plumbing, electrical, roofing, and other work capable of causing significant damage?

  4. 4. Inadequate insurance requirements. The agreement may impose detailed insurance requirements on the owner while establishing no minimum limits for the PM’s own general liability, professional liability, cyber, crime, employment practices liability, or workers’ compensation coverage.

  5. 5. An overly broad limitation of liability. Some agreements limit the PM’s liability to a few months of management fees, even when damages result from serious negligence, legal violations, or breach of the agreement.

  6. 6. One-sided survival provisions. The owner’s indemnification obligations survive termination, while the PM’s indemnification, confidentiality, record transfer, claim cooperation, and document preservation obligations do not.

The management agreement determines whether the associated risks were actually transferred or simply handed back to the owner. Review your PM agreement carefully to identify these exposures before a claim forces you to discover them. 

1Reply
164 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    23h
    I cannot tell you how many property managers we walked away from at the negotiating table because of the one-sided indemnification clause. Their employee could literally walk up to somebody and assault them and it would be up to us to indemnify them and pay all the legal fees. Of course we did not sign that
    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Stuart UdisPro Member
    OP
    Attorney · Philadelphia · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    20h

    @Chris Seveney Indemnification was listed first because it’s so frequently an issue in PM agreements. I’ve had numerous instances where PM’s tried lecturing me on why it has to be the way it’s drafted and it’s clear they don’t understand how indemnification actually works. In the back of my mind I’m already thinking if they don’t understand why their own contract is not equitable there’s no way they are executing contracts on behalf of clients that look out for their interests

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.