Transactional funding misconception

Transactional funding misconception

Member since 2026 · 11 posts · 2 votes

I have never pulled comps on a deal I funded. I do not ask for your ARV, your rehab budget, or your rent estimate.

That surprises people, because every other lender they have talked to starts there.

Do you know what a transactional funder is actually underwriting?

If you assumed it was the property, this post is for you.

Here is what I look at. What kind of transaction it is. Who is on each side and whether they are committed in writing. Which title company is closing it and whether they have been told. How long my money is exposed, and what happens to it if the deal falls apart on day three.

That is the structure. My money moves through the deal for hours or days and comes back out through the same title company. Whether the house is worth what you think it is worth does not touch my capital. Whether your end buyer is real does.

Here is the part I owe you. My approval is not a second opinion on your numbers. If I say yes, it means the transaction is clean, not that you bought well. I have funded deals that were structured perfectly and were still bad buys. That part is on you.

Experienced investors know this and get their own underwriting done before they call me. Newer investors hear yes from a funder and treat it as validation, and that is an expensive misunderstanding.

Who is checking your numbers, if it is not your lender?

0Reply
213 views

Most Popular Reply

Attorney · 10451 Mill Run Cir #755 Owings Mills, MD 21117 · Member since 2024 · 339 posts · 124 votes
1d
Quote from @Jose Cortes:

I have never pulled comps on a deal I funded. I do not ask for your ARV, your rehab budget, or your rent estimate.

That surprises people, because every other lender they have talked to starts there.

Do you know what a transactional funder is actually underwriting?

If you assumed it was the property, this post is for you.

Here is what I look at. What kind of transaction it is. Who is on each side and whether they are committed in writing. Which title company is closing it and whether they have been told. How long my money is exposed, and what happens to it if the deal falls apart on day three.

That is the structure. My money moves through the deal for hours or days and comes back out through the same title company. Whether the house is worth what you think it is worth does not touch my capital. Whether your end buyer is real does.

Here is the part I owe you. My approval is not a second opinion on your numbers. If I say yes, it means the transaction is clean, not that you bought well. I have funded deals that were structured perfectly and were still bad buys. That part is on you.

Experienced investors know this and get their own underwriting done before they call me. Newer investors hear yes from a funder and treat it as validation, and that is an expensive misunderstanding.

Who is checking your numbers, if it is not your lender?

@Jose Cortes, I think the distinction you’re making here is important. I’ve seen investors assume that because financing is approved, someone else has also confirmed that the deal itself makes sense. Those are two very different things.

From the legal and title side, I also like to see the structure checked early. The contracts, the title company, the timing of both closings, and how the funds are moving all need to match what everyone thinks is happening. A deal can look simple on paper and still get complicated at closing if one piece was never clearly addressed.

See this reply in the discussion

6 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    2d

    “I have never pulled comps on a deal I funded. I do not ask for your ARV, your rehab budget, or your rent estimate.”

    That’s because you’ve NEVER funded a deal

    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
    • Member since 2026 · 11 posts · 2 votes
      2d

      Don I love when negative people respond to my posts. They usually show how uneducated they are on the topic. If you had read my post you will see why there is no need for a transactional lender to do any of those things and how the risk is mitigated.

  • Attorney · 10451 Mill Run Cir #755 Owings Mills, MD 21117 · Member since 2024 · 339 posts · 124 votes
    1d
    Quote from @Jose Cortes:

    I have never pulled comps on a deal I funded. I do not ask for your ARV, your rehab budget, or your rent estimate.

    That surprises people, because every other lender they have talked to starts there.

    Do you know what a transactional funder is actually underwriting?

    If you assumed it was the property, this post is for you.

    Here is what I look at. What kind of transaction it is. Who is on each side and whether they are committed in writing. Which title company is closing it and whether they have been told. How long my money is exposed, and what happens to it if the deal falls apart on day three.

    That is the structure. My money moves through the deal for hours or days and comes back out through the same title company. Whether the house is worth what you think it is worth does not touch my capital. Whether your end buyer is real does.

    Here is the part I owe you. My approval is not a second opinion on your numbers. If I say yes, it means the transaction is clean, not that you bought well. I have funded deals that were structured perfectly and were still bad buys. That part is on you.

    Experienced investors know this and get their own underwriting done before they call me. Newer investors hear yes from a funder and treat it as validation, and that is an expensive misunderstanding.

    Who is checking your numbers, if it is not your lender?

    @Jose Cortes, I think the distinction you’re making here is important. I’ve seen investors assume that because financing is approved, someone else has also confirmed that the deal itself makes sense. Those are two very different things.

    From the legal and title side, I also like to see the structure checked early. The contracts, the title company, the timing of both closings, and how the funds are moving all need to match what everyone thinks is happening. A deal can look simple on paper and still get complicated at closing if one piece was never clearly addressed.

    • Member since 2026 · 11 posts · 2 votes
      1d

      Hi Diana! Thanks for your response. I see it a lot when new investors make an assumption. I try to educate them and always tell them to do their own due diligence to avoid issues down the road.

  • Stuart UdisPro Member
    Attorney · Philadelphia · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    1d

    Lending money to someone who doesn’t have enough money to cover a deposit…what could possibly go wrong.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.