Asset & Income verification discovered shortfall with RentRedi

Asset & Income verification discovered shortfall with RentRedi

Emory ClaytonPro Member
Member since 2019 · 69 posts · 25 votes

Do you have this problem?
I use RentRedi's Asset & Income verification to verify an applicants deposit funds are in their account and also if they meet the income requirements. This is done by the tenant by adding their banking info into PLAID, which then gives a 60 day report of their account. It shows how much money is in the account, an itemized list of transaction history, and a quick summary of each income source (if there is more than one). It works well.
However, I have found that applicants do not have both the deposit funds in the same account that funds are deposited from their job, for example. This is an issue because applicants are only allowed to add one account for this screening process. Its a limitation either on the RentRedi or Plaid side.

To try and prevent this, I've added a yes/no question as part of the application, asking the applicant if they understand this so that they can be sure that whatever account is submitted, will show both their income sources and also show that they have enough money in the account to cover the deposit. It is stated much better than this in the application, but I'll spare you the paragraph.

I perfectly understand that an applicant might not have both the deposit funds in the same account as they use for their regular source of income. However it presents a common issue for me, and I'm curious what process do you use here, specifically as it relates to verifying that an applicant has the necessary funds for the deposit, and that their income source meets the minimum requirement that we have listed.

0Reply
111 views

3 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Vaibhav PuranikPro Member
    Member since 2025 · 76 posts · 40 votes
    5d

    This looks like an legit issue. They need to resolve it. I am about to start using RentRedi, so thank you for flagging it. One thing comes to my mind is simply asking them to send the statement or two of their other account(s) (which has the money) to you.

    • Emory ClaytonPro Member
      OP
      Member since 2019 · 69 posts · 25 votes
      3d

      The reason why the Plaid integration is so important is the fact that the source of the documentation comes from their Bank account, not from them. Any document can be forged, and with the prevalence of AI now days, it will become even more of thing because now it is easier to do. Now, this not to say that we only use this to verify their assets and income. Vetting a potential Tennant takes a layered approach, but our belief is this integration is highly accurate and not easily faked, but nothing is perfect in this world, thus the layered approach ;)

  • Mark UpdegraffBusiness Member
    Real Estate Broker · Rochester, NY · Member since 2010 · 1k+ posts · 697 votes
    2d

    @Emory Clayton I'd separate the two things you're trying to verify.

    One is whether the applicant meets your income requirements. The other is whether they have the funds necessary to enter the lease.

    Those are related, but they aren't necessarily going to be demonstrated by the same bank account.

    A limitation in the software shouldn't automatically become a limitation on how someone manages their money.

    I'd establish a consistent alternative documentation process for applicants whose information can't be verified through the integration.

    The important thing is that you're applying the same standards to everyone, documenting how the requirements were satisfied, and handling sensitive financial information securely.

    I'd also avoid collecting more banking information than you actually need.

    We manage a substantial rental portfolio, and the biggest thing I've learned about screening is that consistency matters more than which particular software you're using.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.