CPAs vs Cost Segregators - friends or foes?

CPAs vs Cost Segregators - friends or foes?

Michael PlaksPro Member
Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes

This post is mostly for my tax professionals colleagues and for my cost segregators friends.

In 3 weeks (early November 2026), I am going to speak at the annual conference of cost segregation professionals. While my topic is technical (combining cost segregation with 1031 exchanges), I'm also planning to address the thorny issue of collaboration between CPAs and cost segregators.

I welcome my colleagues' suggestions on how to better coordinate between tax pros and cost segregators and eliminate occasional disconnect. Investors - feel free to chime in, as well. Please either comment here or reach out to me offline.

2Reply
192 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2017 · 97 posts · 25 votes
2d

From the study side: what makes a report CPA-usable is the itemized 1245/1250/39-yr schedule with placed-in-service dates and a clean asset listing, plus a heads-up when something looks like a partial disposition. The studies that cause headaches always arrive as a single number with no backup. Would love to hear what you end up presenting at the conference.

See this reply in the discussion

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Investor · Austin, TX · Member since 2017 · 97 posts · 25 votes
    2d

    From the study side: what makes a report CPA-usable is the itemized 1245/1250/39-yr schedule with placed-in-service dates and a clean asset listing, plus a heads-up when something looks like a partial disposition. The studies that cause headaches always arrive as a single number with no backup. Would love to hear what you end up presenting at the conference.

    • Michael PlaksPro Member
      OP
      Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
      2d

      A single number (or 3 of them) does not qualify as a cost seg study, in my book :)

  • Accountant · San Francisco, CA · Member since 2026 · 94 posts · 50 votes
    2d

    Oh woah Michael thats so cool, congrats on the speaking slot. Nothing really I can suggest, you already know this better than I do. I think just from the CPA side the thing that seems to cause the most friction is just timing, getting looped in before the study is commissioned instead of after. The same study can land pretty differently depending on whether the investor can use the losses against their other income now, or is passive and carries them forward until the deal produces income or they sell. When the segregator and CPA talk early, that part goes a lot smoother. Would love to hear how it goes.

    • Michael PlaksPro Member
      OP
      Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
      2d

      It definitely would be best to have a CPA assessment prior to commencing cost seg study. However, it is not always feasible. Investors are often under the (wrong) impression that cost seg must be done before the end of the year. And they may not even choose their CPA until later. So, they do cost seg in December and pick a CPA in February.

      From a segregator's position, is he going to tell a prospective client: go find a CPA first and then come back to me? Of course not. They will most likely lose this prospect.

  • Aaron ZimmermanBusiness Member
    Accountant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    4h

    Nice! I’d say let the cpa figure out the basis and the breakout between building and land. Thats probably my biggest gripe and then we have to redo the Numbers if the study has already been run.

    Also - if cost seg providers are doing the 3115, have a standardized checklist. The one I primarily use has one and it’s very convenient.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.