What cap rate do you need on small-town SFR rentals?

Question

For those holding single-family rentals in small rural markets (towns under 10K), what's the minimum cap rate you'll buy at? I'm using 7% on all-in cost (price plus repairs plus closing) after 8% vacancy, 8% maintenance, 8% capex, management, taxes and insurance. Is that too low for the extra risk out there (thin resale, fewer tenants, contractor availability), or about right? Curious whether anyone uses a different number for voucher tenants versus market-rate.

Jim Johnson · Answer

For a town under 10,000, 7% would make me cautious. With fewer tenants, limited contractors, and a smaller resale market, one extended vacancy or major repair can eat into that return pretty quickly. The smaller and less active the market, the more cushion the deal needs.

I wouldn't automatically set a different cap rate for voucher tenants. I'd look at the actual rent, local demand, inspection requirements, and how quickly the property could be filled again if that tenant leaves. The voucher alone wouldn't determine the number.

Nicholas L. · Answer

@Bennett Vinson

i don't think "8% capex" makes sense here, especially on rents that are so low - the properties need what they need. maybe one needs a roof and one doesn't. and one needs a furnace, and one doesn't.

and if you factor in all the costs i mentioned... i can tell you: your first year return is going to be zero or negative. and your second year return: zero or negative. you get the picture.

Hossein Sharifi · Answer

Your expense load is solid. In towns under 10K, I'd use 10-12% vacancy rather than 8%, since turns take longer and the tenant pool is thin. I'd also want the deal to clear about 8% on all-in cost, so there's room for an exit cap that's higher than your entry. Resale liquidity is the hidden risk, so check how many comparable homes actually sold in the last 12 months.

Inder Singh · Answer

I underwrite multis in Worcester and Warren, and honestly the headline cap rate is the least interesting number on the page. What I actually look at: rent durability (can this tenant base absorb a $100 bump without turning over?), and exit (who buys this if I need out in 5 years?). Small towns can show 9-10% caps that evaporate the minute you have 2 months vacant with no depth of demand behind you. I'd rather take a 7% in a market with 50 buyers waiting than a 10% where I'm the only bidder. Thin markets punish you on the way out, not the way in. DMs open if you want to talk through a specific deal.

Nicholas L. · Answer

@Bennett Vinson

is this a real question? OK, I'll bite. 0. 0 is my cap rate, or cash on cash rate, or whatever you want to call it.

because there's no cash flow on SFRs right now in the first few years (unless you pretend there is no down payment, no rent ready costs, no leasing fees, no closing costs on the purchase, etc.)

if you pretend, then there is.

Henry Lazerow · Answer

You are running 8% capex on a $700 rents thats only $56? Capex turnover repairs does not go down just because rents are low, its very unlikely it costs less then $250 a month averaged out on a little house so 5x what you are estimating at a minimum. I would not touch even an apartment that rented that low let alone a house, will be a money pit.

Alex S. · Answer

In thin markets I stop thinking in cap rate and underwrite to vacancy and exit instead - a 9 cap on a house that sits 90 days between tenants beats a 7 cap only on paper. Pull actual days-on-market and the rent range from the last 12 months of listings in that town, then rerun with 2 months of vacancy and a sale price 10% under today's comps and see if it still clears. On the voucher point, agreed: the right adjustment is to the quality of that specific house and the local housing authority's inspection turnaround, not a blanket cap rate bump.

Tim Fitchet · Answer

This is a helpful discussion. I agree that smaller markets generally warrant a higher target cap rate to account for thinner buyer pools and potentially longer vacancies. The all-in cost approach makes sense for a fair comparison. Do you also factor in a reserve for the higher turnover costs that can come with rural properties?

Bennett Vinson · Answer

Fair point, and on houses built in 1929 and 1947 a flat % is just a placeholder. I'm walking both next week and will price capex item by item: roof age, HVAC/furnace, water heater, electrical service and wiring, foundation, plumbing. Each gets a remaining-life and replacement cost, and anything due in the first 2 years comes off the offer price instead of being spread as a reserve.

Agreed on the result too. At ask, with the insurance quotes I have, it's thin to negative before a single big item hits. The only version that works is buying well under ask with those items priced in, so year one doesn't eat the reserve. If the walk says roof plus furnace on both, it's a pass.

Richard (Ryszard) Cieplechowicz · Answer

A cap rate is only as good as the expense lines under it. In small towns the usual miss is capex and vacancy. 7% after 8% for each is a fair cushion on paper, but one roof or furnace in year one can wipe out two years of net. I'd look at the age of the roof, HVAC and water heater on each house first and set the reserve from what those need, not a flat percent. For voucher tenants the number matters less than whether the house passes inspection without a big rehab, since a failed inspection means a vacant month or two.

What cap rate do you need on small-town SFR rentals?

What cap rate do you need on small-town SFR rentals?

Most Popular Reply

18 Replies