Realtor · Columbus, Franklin County · Member since 2026 · 10 posts · 1 vote
I self-managed my rentals for years. Here's how I'd decide:
- Self-managing is worth it if you're local, have reliable trades, and treat it like a business: written screening criteria applied the same way every time, a solid lease, move-in photos, and a set maintenance response time.
- Hire a PM if you're out of state or your time is worth more elsewhere. Get the full fee picture in writing: monthly %, leasing, renewals, maintenance markup, and early-termination terms. Ask for days-vacant stats and owner references.
- Either way, renewing a good tenant slightly under market usually beats turnover, which costs a vacant month plus paint, flooring, and leasing.
Owners, what's the one question you wish you'd asked your PM up front?
Self managing can feel lonely at first, especially when a 2am call lands on you. For me the thing that took the most weight off was knowing my own limits early and being okay with asking another owner for a second opinion.
Fully agree! My firm PM's over 450 units and does take the stress off 100%. As long as the math works to have the PM in place and your portfolio is 4+ units I'm all for a PM so I can focus on the front-end and going after more acquisitions.
One question I'd ask upfront is, “What happens when a repair comes up, and at what point do you need my approval?” That's where misunderstandings can happen, especially when an owner gets a bill for work they weren't expecting. Better to know how those decisions are handled before signing the management agreement.
Yes, that’s where a lot can go wrong. But my PM firm sets a limit on the amount a repair can be (usually $500) where we can operate without waiting for owner consent but above that needs owners review and approval. What gets difficult there for the PM is a slow response time from the owner and repairs can’t happen timely and the tenant gets unhappy. Balancing act for sure
What I did not realize, if you were to manage a rental, is whether you use a system. For example we use Buildium and you can pay extra per month to have a hotline/phone number where they'll answer the call. Based on the type of service that is needed from the tenant, they will coordinate the vendor by putting the ticket into the system and notifying the vendor to go perform the repair.
I did not realize that type of service existed, and for people who self-manage small portfolios, it seems like a pretty good deal. But if you evaluate that price compared to what you would pay in property management fees, most likely you would only do it if it had very good savings
@BJ Everson Having both self-managed rentals and properties with a PM, I agree there isn’t one right answer for every property. Self-management gives you more direct control, but you’re also the person coordinating repairs and keeping things moving. A PM can take a lot off your plate, especially at a distance, but it doesn’t remove the need to stay involved as an owner.
The question I’d put at the top of the list is how repairs are handled—from the tenant’s first call through owner approval and the final invoice. I’d want the spending limit, emergency exceptions, any maintenance markup, and communication expectations spelled out before signing. The monthly fee matters, but so does knowing when you’ll hear about an issue and who can authorize the work.
I’m with you on keeping a good tenant, too. A modest rent increase can look better on paper and still leave you worse off if it leads to vacancy and turnover costs. Whether I’m managing directly or working with a PM, I’d rather look at the overall outcome than chase the highest possible rent. Clear expectations and consistent follow-through matter in both setups.
Great comments and totally agree! Think the best move is to self-manage at first so you learn how it’s all done and works and what to expect. Then, you know how to manage the PM with that knowledge and build expectations with them.