A leaking sink takes an hour to fix and four days to manage

Managing Your Property
5dFollow

A leaking sink takes an hour to fix and four days to manage

Lee Futcher
Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 199 posts · 45 votes

Most repairs aren't hard. A leaking sink is a plumber, a part and an hour. What wears landlords down is everything around the repair: the back and forth with the tenant, the plumber who doesn't confirm, the invoice that arrives with no photos, and the question nobody asks a week later: is it still holding?

Count the messages on your last repair. Even a simple leak can easily pass a dozen, across three people, over several days.

So this is the first in a series. I'll take one everyday rental job and break down how an AI teammate would run it step by step, including the parts I'd never hand over. Even if you never use AI, the steps and messages work as a manual system.

The example: a tenant texts, "Kitchen sink is leaking."

1. Get what the vendor needs in the first reply

Most first replies are "OK, I'll get someone out," which means the next five messages are questions. Ask them once instead:

"Thanks for letting me know. Can you send a photo or short video of where the water is coming from? Is it dripping or running, and has it reached the floor or the cabinet below? If it's running, turn the two valves under the sink clockwise to shut it off. What times work for a plumber this week?"

2. Sort it by your written rules

Three buckets, written down once. Emergency (water you can't stop, sewage backup, gas smell, no heat in winter) goes straight to you by phone. Urgent gets a vendor within 24 to 48 hours. Routine gets scheduled.

3. Send the vendor a complete brief

"New job at 123 Main, Unit 2: slow leak under the kitchen sink, photos attached. Water is shut off at the valves. Tenant is available Tuesday or Wednesday after 3. Anything over $300, call me before starting. Can you confirm a time today?"

4. Confirm the visit, or move on

If there's no confirmation within a few hours, the job goes to your second plumber. Once a time is booked, the tenant gets the window and a reminder the day before. This is where most no-shows get caught before they happen.

5. Close the job properly

After the visit, the vendor sends before and after photos with the invoice. The tenant gets one question: "Is everything working?" You get a short summary of what broke, what was done and what it cost.

6. Check that it held

Three days later: "Just checking the sink is still dry underneath." Then it's logged against the unit. That gives you a repair history for each property, for taxes, warranties and spotting the leak that keeps coming back.

What stays human

Approving anything over your limit. Choosing and vetting vendors. Every emergency. Any dispute about who caused the damage or whether a unit is habitable. The AI gathers, coordinates and follows up. You decide.

Where it goes wrong

Without written emergency rules, it can't sort requests safely. Without a spending limit, you get surprise invoices. With only one vendor per trade, there's no backup when they don't answer. And it must never promise a time the vendor hasn't confirmed.

Most landlord software already gives tenants a portal to submit requests, and that part works well. The gap is everything after the request: steps 3 to 6 are where the time goes.

Which of these steps takes the most of your time on a typical repair?

P.S. Still time to vote in Monday's poll on which job you'd hand off first. It closes Friday, and I'll post a step-by-step for whichever one wins.

Cheers,
Lee

0Reply
349 views

Most Popular Reply

Ametria Chaney
Realtor · Memphis, Shelby County · Member since 2026 · 338 posts · 121 votes
5d

Lee, this is a strong system, and I agree the fix is rarely the hard part. For me, the time goes in steps four through six: confirming the visit, closing the job, and checking that it held. That is where the follow-up calls, the waiting for photos and invoices, and the tenant check-in all pile up, and it is also where a small leak can quietly turn into a bigger repair if no one closes the loop. I would add one thing from the agent side: keep that repair history with the property, not just in your inbox. When you sell or refinance, a clear record of what was fixed, when, and by whom tells the next buyer or appraiser that the home was cared for. The first reply matters too, but the close is what protects the property.

1Reply
See this reply in the discussion

7 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Ametria Chaney
    Realtor · Memphis, Shelby County · Member since 2026 · 338 posts · 121 votes
    5d

    Lee, this is a strong system, and I agree the fix is rarely the hard part. For me, the time goes in steps four through six: confirming the visit, closing the job, and checking that it held. That is where the follow-up calls, the waiting for photos and invoices, and the tenant check-in all pile up, and it is also where a small leak can quietly turn into a bigger repair if no one closes the loop. I would add one thing from the agent side: keep that repair history with the property, not just in your inbox. When you sell or refinance, a clear record of what was fixed, when, and by whom tells the next buyer or appraiser that the home was cared for. The first reply matters too, but the close is what protects the property.

    1Reply
  • Matthew Tregoning
    Property Manager · Melbourne, FL · Member since 2019 · 561 posts · 194 votes
    5d

    The unconfirmed appointment is the gap I’d make most visible, Lee. I manage vacation rentals in several states, and “vendor contacted” is a very different status from “someone is going.” Put the next follow-up time and responsible person beside the job, so it can’t quietly sit overnight. If automation stops or the vendor declines, that same person needs a clear alert to take over.

    1Reply
  • Rosina Persaud
    Member since 2023 · 142 posts · 46 votes
    4d

    Lee, you are right — the fix is rarely the hard part. The messages around it are.

    We manage 236 doors in Memphis, mostly single-family, so a leaking sink is a regular job, not an exception. The part that saves us the most time is having the plumber already tested before the leak. We find and test contractors months before breakage, in small paid steps, so we are not vetting someone while water is running.

    Two rules we hold to: the first reply asks for a photo or short video and the tenant's availability, and if there is no confirmed time within a few hours, the job moves to the second contractor. No chasing one vendor for days.

    That is what keeps a one-hour fix from turning into four days of messages. Which step eats the most time for you — getting the tenant details, or getting the vendor to confirm?

    1Reply
  • Lee Futcher
    OP
    Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 199 posts · 45 votes
    4d

    Hi Ametria,

    Thank you for adding the agent side to this. I think you're right that steps four through six are where the time really goes, because each one is waiting on someone else to reply, send a photo or confirm a time.

    I really like your point about keeping the repair history with the property. Most landlords think of that record as something for taxes or warranties, but it also shows a buyer or an appraiser that the home was looked after. That usually only gets noticed when it's time to sell or refinance, and by then the details are often scattered across old texts and emails.

    It's a helpful reminder that closing the loop protects the property as much as it saves time.

    All the best,
    Lee

    0Reply
  • Lee Futcher
    OP
    Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 199 posts · 45 votes
    3d

    Afternoon @Rosina Persaud,

    From what I see, it's the vendor confirmation, by a wide margin. Getting the photo and the tenant's availability usually takes one good first message. Getting a vendor to commit to a time can take three or four follow-ups, and that's where the job quietly sits.

    Your rule of moving the job to the second contractor after a few hours is the strongest fix I've seen for it. One thing I'd add is telling vendors about that rule when they first join your list. When a plumber knows the job moves on if it isn't confirmed by a certain time, the confirmations tend to come back a lot faster.

    Your point about testing contractors months ahead in small paid steps also became one of the steps in today's vendor discussion, so thank you for sharing it: https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/899/topics/1319245-how-do-you-find-vendors-who-actually-call-back

    Take care,
    Lee

    0Reply
  • Noah WrightBusiness Member
    USA, Nationwide · Member since 2024 · 394 posts · 135 votes
    19h

    Lee, the week-later check you built in is the step that earns its keep, and it matters for a reason beyond the repair. A lot of landlord insurance policies exclude water damage from leakage that went on for weeks, so if a slow drip under the cabinet turns into a soft subfloor, the claim can come back denied as gradual damage. When an adjuster asks how long it was leaking, the date the tenant first texted and the date someone confirmed it was dry are the two facts that answer it. On a rental with a DSCR loan, an uncovered loss like that comes out of your reserves while the payment stays the same. Does your system stamp the first report time on its own, or does someone have to enter it?

    [email protected]737-773-3717
    1Reply
  • Lee Futcher
    OP
    Technology · Vancouver, BC · Member since 2026 · 199 posts · 45 votes
    17h

    Hey @Noah Wright,

    That's such a useful point, and one I hadn't thought about from the insurance side. A slow drip that turns into a soft subfloor is exactly the kind of claim that can come back as gradual damage, and on a DSCR loan the reserves take the hit while the payment doesn't move.

    To your question, I don't own rentals myself, so I can only tell you how I'd set it up. I'd let the tenant's first message be the record, since a text or a request form already carries the date and time it arrived, and nobody has to remember to type it in. Then whoever confirms it's dry adds a photo of the area under the sink to that same record. With those two entries side by side in one place, the adjuster's question is answered without anyone digging back through old texts.

    Thanks for adding the insurance angle,
    Lee

    0Reply
Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.
Log InJoin for Free