The play here is equity capture and principal paydown not monthly cash flow.For Tuesday I'd focus on verifying the $240k ARV.

The sub-$160/sqft in Exeter is definitely eye-catching - you don't see that often in coastal NH.On the historic (1700s) construction question, I've seen this play out both ways.

Many properties at lower price points are technically livable but dated, and expectations play a big role in whether a deal feels workable or disappointing.If your goal is investment-focused rather than owner-occupied, expanding the search radius or adjusting the strategy slightly can open more doors.

Unlike REITs, you have more direct influence over the income side of the equation.2) Appreciation (or price) return: Playing the devils advocate, Nareit All Equity REIT index has outperformed NCREIF Property Index for the last 30 years.

I'd also look to see how much gain you have if the above is not in play.

The upside is realistic and downside is mitigated since we arent playing with massive numbers; this it is mostly for experience.

This is more important in the Suburbs (Bucks/montco) - SD plays a big role there.Once you narrow in on location, the next focus should be building type.

For example:A $400K duplex with each side renting for $1,600 could cover 50–60% of the monthly mortgage and expenses, allowing the owner-occupant to live significantly below market rent.In higher-rent areas, some house hackers still manage to live for free or nearly free especially when we look at triplexes and fourplexes.The bottom line: it’s not as “easy” as it once was, but house hacking remains a viable strategy — especially for investors who view it as a long-term play combining reduced living costs, equity growth, and rental experience.👉 I’d love to hear from the community:Do you think house hacking in the Twin Cities still makes sense in 2025?

Financing plays a role.  

Before committing, demo a couple and make sure their reporting and bookkeeping play well with your CPA or accounting system.