It seems to be a ¨market shortage¨ or maybe I´m doing something wrong.

Basically it asks the court to ignore the LLC or corporate status because of wrong doing by the defendant. 

You can never go wrong doing the right thing no matter what value property you’re working on. 

I have been told(by a loan  broker) that our building won't pass a seismic, even though it has the Los Angeles required retrofit improvements, because it is a five story brick building, and generally they don't pass a seismic inspection, usually(at best) just falling short of the requirements.Is this wrong?

@Brian Van Pelt  Thanks for your info.No, not really any wrongdoing. 

I know you don't mean any wrongdoing, but if you're writing it this way, it's definitely coming off that way to your potential partner.  

At the end of the day if your returns are better and less volatile using real estate than investing in the stock market there is nothing wrong doing it.

Someone should correct me if I am wrong.

Back to the financial case, I understand it, when there was evidence of wrong doing 7 years ago, and theoretically speaking this could have been stopped given enough momentum on the web, these actions would have been perceived as defamation and therefore would not have been allowed to surface on the internet.

Soros denied any wrongdoing and said news of the takeover was public knowledge.[17] His insider trading conviction was upheld by the highest court in France on June 14, 2006.[18] In December, 2006 he appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that the 14-year delay in bringing the case to trial precluded a fair hearing.[19]