That was my thought, I am putting a little doubt on this story - yes this happens in DC in SE and NE which there are not many $2.3M homes in that area unless its multiunit. 

Hi Marcus,There are many ways to skin a cat per se lolPersonally, I'd rather have volume and 10 "in da hood" where the numbers don't lie and where I know what I'm doing.Then buying using a tonne of leverage and hoping the market will appreciate."

Also, I don't think they usually aren't wrong per se but conservative or incomplete?

My 2bd 1br was rented in less than 2 weeks last month on the SE side for 975 and I know it is not as nice as your unit!

We are buying about $1M in assets per month across the Midwest/SE and hopeful we can fine THEE ONE that we can scale withI appreciate your response.

This is all very recent, so I have no feedback per se on the experience, but will up-date this thread down the road.  

of the "great photo" examples having calendars that are wiiiiiiide open, with barely a booking on them.Fair enough, I pulled these from first page results of nation wide searches (it was skewed SE for me because I mainly look in those areas) so they obviously rank very high on the algorithm.

Any excess is fed back in the grid and is taken off the electricity bill.I don't think it was a selling point for the tenant per se but it is a nice extra.

That means real estate rentals aren't "per se" passive.

I would not characterize this as a scam per se.. but it appears to me to be a failed investment model..