.- May not have the systems to avoid major issuesPMC Strengths- Multiple admin staff to better handle workload- More expertise (if you hire right PMC)- Have the "density" to invest in systems to get rentals more marketing exposure, better vendor pricing, better tenant screening tools, better delinquency solutions, etc.Weaknesses- May not pay attention to same metrics as owner- Getting more & more difficult for one person to know everything about 100+ doors- Bigger companies=> more red tape and right hand not knowing what left hand doing

People repeat secondhand narratives picked up from scattered corners of the internet — most of it not grounded in facts or personal engagement.

Or do you do multiple deals like this simultaneously? 

You can get multiple off-market deals per month, rehab them with reliable local crews, and flip with solid margins.

@Roland Cordar, You can also consider that "one" purchase of a portfolio of multiple properties in the 1031 exchange. 

When I could've lowered coverage and sent it multiple times to a smaller lead group. 2.

That’s the exact friction point I’m trying to solve.Currently, there's really no easy way to track a specific Maintenance Task historically.PMC's use Work Orders (WO) for tracking and it's very common for a WO to have multiple MNT Tasks in them.So, then it becomes VERY difficult to track a specific MNT Task in the past - other than a person's memory.Speed: seems 80% of MNT Tasks tenants want fixed ASAP, which is just not possible.Cost: owners have unrealistic expectations of MNT costs.

Make sure you have multiple exit strategies, though.

Also mixing multiple sources for the same lead (like pulling from 2 different platforms) gives you backup numbers when the first one's dead.

The turning point for engaging a property manager is often when the time cost outweighs the savings or when further scaling becomes difficult without proper systems in place.You mentioned that you currently use an agent for tenant screening and showings which is a smart approach.