22 December 2025 | 41 replies
Hey Alex, yes that's basically right.
2 January 2026 | 21 replies
So here’s two of the basic alternatives: reverse engineer to determine the capital needed in 2035v(don’t forget to account for the devaluation of fiat currency (inflation), decide on a plan to follow which gives you the best shot at obtaining said amount of capital, and unless something “dire” occurs, “work”the plan.Alternative 2: learn all you can about real estate investing, with a foundation of real estate principles, real estate finance, and real estate law.
23 December 2025 | 11 replies
Even though the nurse is already vetted through their agency, I still run standard checks on any adult who will be living in the home—mainly a background check for safety and basic income verification if they’ll be contributing.If the nurse’s contract alone easily meets the income requirement, I don’t stress too much about the spouse’s finances, but I still verify who they are since they’ll be occupying the property.
31 December 2025 | 133 replies
Basically this is the first time I felt confident enough in a program to take the leap and go for it.
24 December 2025 | 29 replies
This is why so many investors are confused, they think they own a class B property, but it's really a class D - and now they are confused because they have class D problems and don't understand why.The market gets basically segmented into four equal quarters by price.Class A is the top 25%Class B is above median----Median is here----Class C is below medianClass D is bottom 25%Class A makes little to no sense to invest, that is $500k and up in Indy.
22 December 2025 | 6 replies
You can ask your bank about "IntraFi Networks (ICS)", basically it's a way for banks to ensure coverage over the $250K threshold.
27 December 2025 | 18 replies
I do not buy out of my market which is basically a radius of about 60 miles.
19 December 2025 | 15 replies
Since the main house will have mostly walk-in showers and only one basic tub, having a true “wow” bathroom in the carriage house could really elevate it as a couples retreat.
16 December 2025 | 1 reply
In addition, the concepts or Basis and At Risk, are beyond most Taxpayers.]Plus 20% accuracy-related penalties.Total deficiencies: $24,451 (2013) and $14,440 (2014)Total penalties: $4,890 (2013) and $2,888 (2014)The case doesn't say how their returns were prepared.
29 December 2025 | 194 replies
There are a few other items but the point is and has always been, the underwriting performed was sloppy, broad stroked and lacked basic inter line item relationship logic.