These are data from the Urban Land Institute and Price Waterhouse Cooper (I think that is what PwC stands for!). 

I went to the review board to protest and even though I had the data to prove my valuation 2 of the 3 board members acted like kings and shook their head no, we believe it should be $450,000.

I have heard that Deal machine now includes Skip tracing so you don’t need that (assuming the data is there and is good).

They should be advising you throughout the search, providing you with comparable market data on ARV sales, current condition value with your offers & factoring in potential scope of work to get to the ARV, leasing data & connections to name a few.

A new data center announcement or maybe an Amazon fulfillment center moving into a metro area are a few examples.

Your data stays on your device.Check it out: https://reinvestor.nkos.appWould love to hear what tools you'd want added.

The current Market Finder data is from June 2024, and an update is planned.

The data is all public.How I'm using this to negotiateHere's where this becomes an offensive strategy rather than just a defensive one.Most sellers in California flood zones don't disclose flood risk adequately.

If I were advising you directly, I would stay focused on facts and documentation: • Provide stronger and truly comparable sales if the ones used are not appropriate • Submit current rent rolls and signed leases that support the higher rents • Document renovations and capital improvements with dates and costs • Point out any factual errors in unit count, condition, or square footage Keep it data driven.

Any common contractor traps during final 10–15% completion?