Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Results (10,000+)
Lewis Yuan [Calc Review] Chicago Triplex - Help me analyze this deal
7 August 2018 | 9 replies
View report*This link comes directly from our calculators, based on information input by the member who posted.Hey BiggerPockets,I have found a potential deal on a multi-family in Chicago that may cash flow but unfortunately is in a C-neighborhood (and also right next to a major metro airport so maybe noise factor will be bad). 
Andrew Taylor Several small STRs? Or one large unit?
27 July 2018 | 11 replies
I do have to point out that regardless of cash flow, or return on investment, etc, the smaller units are A LOT MORE LABOR-INTENSIVE.
Brian Tran Question for Looking at Properties
26 July 2018 | 2 replies
Brian, I don't think investors WANT to see 50 or 100 houses before they make an offer but I would make a couple of points:1) As I tell my life partner "you have to kiss a lot of toads" before you find the right one but this is related to how you find the home...meaning if it is on the MLS - typically harder to find a deal although not impossible, if you drive for dollars you might have to look a lot of owners up but if you get to the point to see one odds start to flow in your favor2) If what you refer to is being a newbie and trying to understand what a good deal is or is not and if you have the time, touring that many properties to get an idea of value is fine.I have a w2 job and family so never had the time to specifically look at 100 properties with no intention to buy --  this is in no way a requirement.  
Adam Mittermeier Equity and Buy and Hold?
28 July 2018 | 8 replies
You may have a legitimate reason to do so like great cash flow.
Thomas C. Personal Line of Credit - Use it or leave it alone?
27 July 2018 | 6 replies
This method obviously requires me to have positive cash flow (which I do). 
Mark Shelstad Best way to zone heat a 2000 sq ft home
27 July 2018 | 4 replies
The two other methods I am aware of are installing a motorized main damper to direct flow to the area calling for it and hydronic boilers driving several remote air handlers.
Michael Pike Passing utility & landscaping costs to tenants
20 December 2018 | 8 replies
It's not hard- install aerators in sinks which don't have them(and install Water Sense faucets when replacing faucets, they'll use about 15% less water than regular faucets.)Then use low-flow shower heads(go for 1.75 gpm, anything lower will cause unhappy residents.)
Dee Jay Investing in Chicago :: Good, or Bad?
30 July 2018 | 13 replies
I am considering a 1031 exchange of an investment property I have in Los Angeles (one of four) out of State to get better cash flow returns, as I have a lot of equity.
Justin Seng Taxes and Insurance in Escrow or not?
30 July 2018 | 13 replies
It gives me better average cash flow.
Daniel Winsor Newbie just starting out - Key West
3 August 2018 | 7 replies
Moved to Key West and will be flying the F-5.Goals: Would like to build a modest portfolio of rental properties to eventually achieve FI based on cash flow.