Offmarket Triplex with Tenants in Place

Offmarket Triplex with Tenants in Place

Member since 2025 · 2 posts · 3 votes

I know this is a long read, thank you to anyone who makes it to the end!

Hi all! My wife and I are looking to buy our first property and plan to house hack a small multifamily. I researched our area and sent letters to off-market owners who fit our criteria.

I ended up connecting with an owner who has two attached triplexes. She initially wanted to sell both together, which I couldn’t do since I need an owner-occupied conventional loan. However, I was able to get her to consider selling me one triplex now and potentially the second one after a year. She’s 73, her husband passed away several years ago, and she’s looking to start liquidating some of her properties.

Now for the details:

There is an HOA that covers landscaping, trash, and roof replacements. The roofs all appeared to be in good condition across the property. The HOA also covers insurance, including windstorm insurance (which is required in our area), so I would not need a separate policy. The current fee is $145 per unit, and both the owner and another nearby owner confirmed it hasn't increased since around 2018. I've always been cautious about HOAs, but this one seems relatively stable and owner-friendly. I'm currently waiting on the official HOA documents from her realtor.

All three units are fully rented, with some tenants having been there for 10–15 years. Their leases will transition to month-to-month at the end of this month. The property manager intentionally kept rents well below market to minimize turnover, so current rents are significantly under market for the area.

I asked the owner if she would be open to delivering the property fully  vacant at closing (so we can move in, begin renovations, and screen our own tenants), but she prefers not to, as she doesn’t want to be the one displacing tenants. She did mention that I would have the right to provide 30-day notice after closing. That said, I’m not comfortable relying on that alone, I plan to include a clause in the contract requiring at least one unit to be vacant at closing so we can meet owner-occupancy requirements. We’re scheduled to tour the property next week.

Here’s where I’d appreciate some advice:

We are currently renting an apartment (ironically right across the street from the property), and our lease runs through October. We’re receiving a $230/month concession, but if we break the lease early, we would have to repay those concessions plus the remaining rent of the lease, so it doesn’t seem financially beneficial to break it.

If we move forward with this deal and inherit the existing tenants in the other two units, what’s the best strategy for getting rents to market?

Here are a few options I’ve considered:

1. Hold rents as-is until our lease ends (October), then reposition

Pros: Helps offset the mortgage, gives us time to renovate our unit, and avoids immediate disruption

Cons: Leaves ~$300–400/month per unit on the table and we didn’t screen the tenants ourselves

2. Gradually increase rents

Pros: Improves cash flow sooner

Cons: Higher likelihood of turnover, and again, tenants weren’t screened by us

3. Vacate units myself and fully reposition immediately

Pros: Full control, faster path to market rents, easier renovation, can screen tenants 

Cons: Carrying full mortgage + renovation costs + current lease obligations, I'm the "bad guy", holding costs

If you made it this far, you’re the GOAT 🙏

Any feedback, constructive criticism, or strategies would be greatly appreciated!

0Reply
211 views

Most Popular Reply

Bo SmithPro Member
Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 1k+ posts · 373 votes
7mo

The tenant situation is the real issue here, not the HOA. You're buying occupied, and she's told you upfront she doesn't want to displace them. That's fine -- lots of investors buy tenanted properties. But you're also saying you want to renovate and screen your own tenants. Those two goals are in conflict.

The 30-day notice post-closing only works if you can live with whatever situation that creates. If you empty the units and then can't find tenants fast, you're carrying a property with zero income for months. If the market slows and the rent-ready window becomes longer, you're stuck. That's why creative investors usually negotiate a vacancy clause in the contract -- something like "property will be vacant by closing" or "seller will provide 60 days notice to all tenants now." It puts the burden on the seller, not you.

Since she's not budging on that, here's what I'd do: Get her to agree to a rent concession or a price reduction equal to what you'll lose carrying vacant units for 60-90 days while you renovate and re-tenant. That way, you're not absorbing the whole cost of her preference to keep tenants happy.

How long do you think the actual renovations will take, and what's the typical turnover timeline in your market once you list at-rent?

See this reply in the discussion

9 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Agent · Kansas City · Member since 2018 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    7mo

    If you are going to keep the lease on your apartment I would minimize the bleeding by vacating all units and spending money on renovations. I'd focus on rehabbing the vacant unit for you guys. During that time you could slightly bump each of the tenants rents but still try to retain them. If you do have a bunch of savings and reserves you could go aggressive rehabbing all the units and filling at market but that's spreading yourself out thin. Anyway you can get out of the lease or do an early termination fee to minimize costs?

  • Real Estate Broker · Atlanta · Member since 2024 · 1k+ posts · 607 votes
    7mo

    Christopher, I did lean toward Option 1 with a plan to inherit tenants, stabilize cash flow and then raise rents gradually or turn units as leases roll. No need to force vacancy and take on unnecessary carrying costs plus lease penalties. The biggest priorities should be to secure one unit vacant at closing which is non-negotiable for owner-occupancy, review HOA docs carefully and verify true market rents vs. current.

    Bottom line: preserve cash flow first, then reposition strategically but not all at once.

  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    7mo

    Going to guess that the rents are low because of all the deferred maintenance!

    Get the best inspector you can find to go through all 3 units and check out foundation and roof.

    How does this place have an HOA?
    - How many buildings does it cover and who runs it?
    - Where are the financials?

    You are unlikely to succeed at raising rents more than 5-10% annually.
    Anything more will push the tenants out.

    How are you going to fund rehabbing 3 units all at the same time?
    - Better to rehab one at a time as you live in the unit being rehabbed. This will max your cashflow. 

  • Honolulu, HI · Member since 2008 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7mo
    Quote from @Christopher Garcia:

    There is an HOA that covers landscaping, trash, and roof replacements. The roofs all appeared to be in good condition across the property. The HOA also covers insurance, including windstorm insurance (which is required in our area), so I would not need a separate policy. The current fee is $145 per unit, and both the owner and another nearby owner confirmed it hasn't increased since around 2018. I've always been cautious about HOAs, but this one seems relatively stable and owner-friendly. I'm currently waiting on the official HOA documents from her realtor.


    I stopped reading at this point. Having been a licensed HOA Managing Agent for over 10 years, for multiple Associations, the dead giveaway is right there. Fees have not risen since 2018. The Board has FAILED at their #1 responsibility, which is to Maintain, Protect, and Preserve ALL Common Elements. Not just some, ALL. And they are supposed to adjust the monthly fee every year based on actual conditions, actual costs, and inflation. Clearly they have done none of that. I will guarantee there are significant signs of deferred maintenance throughout the project; furthermore, they WILL receive an "unexpected" Special Assessment in the near future.

    The Docs you have requested, be SURE to request the current year Operating Budget, and the Reserves Funding Plan, and the most recent Reserve Study, even if it is several years old.

    The Study, if complete, should give you a mostly accurate actual assessment of the project physical condition, with the caveat that often the Board provides many of the estimates and remaining life numbers for elements, and that info is not accurate.

    The Reserve Funding Plan should show a dollar amount as "unfunded" which just reflects the fact that the unfunded amount needs to be made up before a particular element can be repaired/replaced. The "remaining life" shown for each element tells you when they anticipate needing the "replacement cost" for it. 

    All HOA funding comes from the pockets of it's Owners, and nowhere else. The longer they put off needed repairs due to lack of funds, the more costly it will be. Feel free to post a link to any doc you have questions about...they are all public.

  • Dan H.Pro Member
    Investor · Poway, CA · Member since 2015 · 7k+ posts · 8k+ votes
    7mo

    I want to point out somethings:

    OO loan typically requires intent to move into the unit within 60 days. October is much further than 60 days

    Evictions can be difficult and take a lot of time and sometimes money.

    Typically the longer a tenant occupies the unit the more the tenant flip costs

    Raising rents by a lot when rents are not increasing substantially has high turnover risk   Raising rents modestly but greater than market increase has some turnover risk.   Best practice is to keep rents close to market rent.

    Where is the money going to come from in a year to purchase the 2nd condo. Especially if you move into unit 1 in Oct (already questionable about mortgage fraud) you cannot get another OO loan in a year.

    Good luck

  • Bo SmithPro Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 1k+ posts · 373 votes
    7mo

    This is a smart move -- sending off-market letters and actually getting a deal out of it puts you ahead of 90% of new investors. The triplex structure, the existing tenants, and the house hack angle all work well together. But you're right to be cautious about the delivery terms, so let's talk through the real risks.

    The biggest issue isn't the tenants themselves -- it's the market rent gap. If current rents are 20-30% below market (which they likely are if the previous owner was intentionally depressing them), you have two problems. One, your lender will probably appraise based on current rents, which crushes your loan amount on a house hack. Two, when you do get those tenants to market rates, you're creating a 30% increase on people who've been paying for years. That leads to turnover, and turnover is expensive.

    So yeah, push hard for vacant at closing. Even if it costs you 2-3K more in seller concessions or a price reduction, it's worth it. You get to screen tenants, install the rent at market rate from day one, and avoid the month-to-month chaos. Some sellers will bend if you position it right -- "I'm renovating, so they're transitioning anyway" -- but she sounds set on the current arrangement.

    Question: what's the current rent total versus what you're underwriting as stabilized monthly income? That gap will tell you whether this still makes sense as a house hack or if you need to treat it as a buy-to-hold rental property instead.

  • Wale LawalBusiness Member
    Real Estate Broker · Houston | Dallas | Austin, TX · Member since 2018 · 5k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7mo

    @Christopher Garcia

    I think that is a solid first deal, good work finding an off-market seller. My idea for option 2 is to keep the current renters and then raise their rent once the property is steady and we have a history of their payments. For your first house project, you need to keep one unit empty when you close because of the financing. Also, try not to do too much renovation work at the beginning since keeping your cash flow and control over the property is really important.

    Good luck!

  • Bo SmithPro Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 1k+ posts · 373 votes
    7mo

    The tenant situation is the real issue here, not the HOA. You're buying occupied, and she's told you upfront she doesn't want to displace them. That's fine -- lots of investors buy tenanted properties. But you're also saying you want to renovate and screen your own tenants. Those two goals are in conflict.

    The 30-day notice post-closing only works if you can live with whatever situation that creates. If you empty the units and then can't find tenants fast, you're carrying a property with zero income for months. If the market slows and the rent-ready window becomes longer, you're stuck. That's why creative investors usually negotiate a vacancy clause in the contract -- something like "property will be vacant by closing" or "seller will provide 60 days notice to all tenants now." It puts the burden on the seller, not you.

    Since she's not budging on that, here's what I'd do: Get her to agree to a rent concession or a price reduction equal to what you'll lose carrying vacant units for 60-90 days while you renovate and re-tenant. That way, you're not absorbing the whole cost of her preference to keep tenants happy.

    How long do you think the actual renovations will take, and what's the typical turnover timeline in your market once you list at-rent?

  • Bo SmithPro Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 1k+ posts · 373 votes
    7mo

    You're overthinking the tenant situation, which is actually good because most first-time buyers underthink it. But here's the real play: those long-term tenants paying below-market are actually your best asset, not your biggest problem. They're stable, they pay on time (proven track record), and you're not rushing 30-60 day turnover in your first rehab. Move in, do cosmetic stuff if needed, then start adjusting rents when leases expire. You'll get to market rate eventually without the headache of turning everything at once.

    On the HOA concern -- 45/unit hasn't moved since 2018? That's either really stable management or a ticking time bomb. Get those docs and read the reserve study. Check if they've had any special assessments recently. A roof replacement that's "covered" but funded through HOA is way different than actually being reserved for. If the reserve fund is less than 50% funded, that's a warning sign. How long is the property assuming the roof will last, and when was it actually last replaced?

    On the 30-day notice thing -- that's real leverage for you. You own the property, the leases convert to month-to-month, you have every right to non-renew for owner occupancy. Don't sign anything that locks you into keeping tenants. What's the area's vacancy rate looking like right now? Are you planning to owner-occupy one unit or all three?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.