I’m trying to better understand how investors approach financing when acquiring multiple properties in a single deal.
For those who’ve done this:
Would be great to hear what’s worked (and what hasn’t)
The package vs individual question is the most important one to get right upfront.
Blanket loans: one payment, lower closing costs, but everything is cross-collateralized. Selling or refinancing one property later becomes complicated. Individual DSCR loans cost more at closing but each asset stays independent — much cleaner as you scale.
Most flexible lenders, portfolio DSCR lenders and debt funds. Banks say yes in theory and get restrictive in practice.
Biggest scaling advantage of DSCR: your personal income and DTI don't limit how many properties you can finance. The property qualifies itself.
Biggest pitfall: blanket loan prepayment penalties and cross-collateralization locking you into a structure you can't unwind cleanly.
I work on portfolio DSCR and blanket loan structures. Happy to compare the two side by side on your specific deal.
How many properties and what markets are you looking at?
@Matthew Bernal That's really helpful—appreciate you breaking that down. The distinction between blanket loans and DSCR structures makes a lot of sense, especially on the flexibility side as you scale.
I’m part of a syndication group, so we’ve come across some of those same benefits and challenges in different deals.
There’s definitely a possibility we may want to connect further on something down the line. I’ll reach out if we have any specific scenarios we’d like your input on.
Appreciate it again.
@Matthew Bernal That's really helpful—appreciate you breaking that down. The distinction between blanket loans and DSCR structures makes a lot of sense, especially on the flexibility side as you scale.
I’m part of a syndication group, so we’ve come across some of those same benefits and challenges in different deals.
There’s definitely a possibility we may want to connect further on something down the line. I’ll reach out if we have any specific scenarios we’d like your input on.
Appreciate it again.
Sure Thank you.
The answer depends on the size of the portfolio, the asset type, and the exit plan.
I’ve seen investors approach this a few different ways:
The downside is that the properties may be tied together under one loan. That can make it harder to sell or refinance one property later unless the loan has clear release provisions.
The downside is more underwriting, more closing costs, more paperwork, and sometimes slower execution.
The biggest pitfalls I would watch for are:
The scaling benefit is real. Buying multiple properties at once can save time and give you a larger rent base faster. But it also means multiple roofs, tenants, insurance policies, repairs, and surprises can hit at the same time.
My preference would be to underwrite the deal both ways:
That way you can see whether the portfolio only works because the strong properties are hiding the weak ones.
I would also want a clear plan for each asset: hold, refinance, sell, stabilize, or improve. If the loan structure does not match the business plan, the financing can become the thing that limits your exit options.
For leverage, I would rather leave some cash in reserves than stretch to the maximum loan amount, especially if several properties have older roofs, deferred maintenance, tenant issues, or uncertain insurance costs.
I’m trying to better understand how investors approach financing when acquiring multiple properties in a single deal.
For those who’ve done this:
Would be great to hear what’s worked (and what hasn’t)
@Lamont Ellis
A lot depends on the type of properties and your exit strategy. Some investors prefer a blanket or portfolio loan for simplicity, while others split them into individual loans for more flexibility when refinancing or selling. It's worth comparing both approaches early since financing structure can have a big impact on scalability.