Buying properties to simply break even?

Buying properties to simply break even?

Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes

Hi all! 

I know what you all are thinking.."investing for 0 cash flow?" but looking at the current market in my area that's how the numbers seem to work. 

In my area, Phoenix Arizona (specifically Tempe, a college town) I'd be extremely lucky to find a 3 or 4 bed for 150k that needs work. Now, with a 30k rehab totaling 180k I'd be looking at rents around 1800 per month. Just to note, I haven't yet used the driving for dollars method which may change my outlook. (I will be doing this when I'm closer to buying)

So it looks like I'm just barely making that 1% rule of thumb marker. 

So for a easy example lets say:

Property: $180k 

Mortgage: $990 

Monthly rent at 1.1%: $1980

Annual income (minus 50% as a rule of thumb): $11880

Annual MTG Payment: $11880

Net Annual profits: $0

So here at 1.1% I'm breaking even, assuming 50% going to vacancies and expenses.

My long term goal isn't to cash flow necessary in the short term, but to have ~15 properties paid outright in 20 years while I work. 

That being said, would you recommend this as a model moving forward? Is that break even margin too close that I could actually move into negative cash flow?

Looking at 200 dollars negative cash flow for one property isn't a huge deal while the note is being paid down but 10-15 properties gets into the 20k-30k losses per year. Yikes!

Other considerations - were nearing peak market and these properties could go through a correction leaving my early investments underwater and rents lower adding to the potential for negative cash flow.

Thanks!

4Reply
188 views

Most Popular Reply

Chris MasonPro Member
Moderator
Lender · CA · Member since 2015 · 9k+ posts · 10k+ votes
9y

Hi @Account Closed

Very high income persons will sometimes purchase break-even real estate because real estate is tax advantaged in the United States. 

Let's suppose your scenario numbers are exactly correct at $0 net, but it also yields $4500 of your income not being taxed due to the famous depreciation write-off, that otherwise would have been taxed at 40%. That would actually put you ahead $1800/year, in addition to whatever equity and appreciation gains you might have.

Let's scale that up, pretend you are a real estate mogul who runs for president and proudly declares that you pay "very little" in taxes. Maybe that $1800/year is more like $180k/year that you otherwise would have had to give to the IRS. And maybe you get too aggressive with this, and end up with a bunch of bankruptcies. But, I digress.

Back to normal person reality, in the Bay Area this isn't super unusual, but I have no idea what is and isn't normal in Arizona. Perhaps one spouse is a senior software engineer earning $400k/yr, and the other spouse's $60k/yr is going to be taxed at 40%, putting that spouse at $36k/yr net after taxes. Maybe, instead of busting his butt 40 hours a week for $36k, he instead does all the property management and real estate acquisitions, to help shelter his wife's senior software engineer pay of $400k/yr from taxes as much as possible, while still enjoying appreciation and equity gains.

See this reply in the discussion

54 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Fairfield, CA · Member since 2017 · 98 posts · 84 votes
    9y

    @Account Closed 1.1% is above the 1% rule. This could be a good buy in an area that does see appreciation. It is also unlikely to be 50% expenses. The rules of thumb are just that, rules of thumb, and should only be used to peak your interest in a deal and are not meant to be the deciding factor. Use a real estate calculator such as this one:

    https://financialmentor.com/calculator/real-estate...

    and this one

    http://www.goodmortgage.com/Calculators/Investment...

    and the one on bigger pockets to analyze ACTUAL expenses.

    I like looking at multiple calculators. The second one is good because it includes the effect of appreciation. 

    If you are buying in an area where appreciation is flat, like parts of Texas, then you want more cashflow, and maybe use the 2% rule of thumb. If you are investing in an area that historically has seen appreciation and will likely appreciate in the future, 1% is a good standard. What you don't want, is negative cash flow.

    Also, make sure you have enough reserves and you can handle a bad year.

  • Fairfield, CA · Member since 2017 · 98 posts · 84 votes
    9y

    @Account Closed One other thing... This "we are near peak market" bit is definitely not a given. The market could go up for several more years, and then, when it does cool off, it might not come down much at all. Just go flat. So not investing during an up cycle could cost you as a missed opportunity. It's not to say we should just blindly buy into all up cycles. We need to look at the whole situation.

    Some considerations about the current market:

    Lenders requirements are still high. Buyer's are well qualified for their loans. This means there isn't likely to be a wave of foreclosures from these loans, which would push prices down.

    There is still a housing supply shortage in middle income neighborhoods. Builders are tending to focus in luxury markets where there are more profits (but there is a bit of over supply here).

    Mortgage rates are still very attractive historically.

    Price to rent and Price to income ratios are still in the affordable range.

    Here is an article about the current market. It's looking like we are closer to mid-cycle than end-cycle.


    http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/...

  • Fairfield, CA · Member since 2017 · 98 posts · 84 votes
    9y

    Sorry, one more post... Also consider the local nature of real estate. One area might tank in a market downturn while another area could still go up. Depends on local conditions.

  • Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes
    9y

    Great! Thank you for sharing your insight and the calculators. Distinguishing between an area with flat appreciation versuses areas with historical appreciation needs to be considered. 

    Thanks

  • Investor · Orange County, CA · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    9y
    Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

    @David Faulkner  cash out refi's are temporarily tax free.. LOL.. your basis is still your basis you pay tax when you exit.. but if you never exit and just let your family inherit well then yes its been tax free for you while your alive.  :)

     Yep ... you enjoy the tax free income and 1031 exchange until your kids inherit with stepped up basis ... swap till you drop :) 

  • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
    Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
    9y

    @David Faulkner  this was one of my favorite targets...  bigger timber properties that were inherited by the kids.. logs were on the ground as soon as  ( well you know)... kids want the cash then they use that to pay the tax.. but they get the stepped up basis so that is good.

    my point was its simply not tax free if you sell it in your lifetime.. I have never held a property more than 8 to 10 years.. other than my land in Rohnert Park that I am going to do a mixed use development on..

  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2013 · 919 posts · 911 votes
    9y

    @Account Closed  I don't avoid Tempe.  You need to watch your areas.  It's not presently part of my business model/portfolio.  I have nicer properties, 3/2's in good school districts.  My max rent is $1315 a month, most are around 1250-ish.  The highest I paid was 177k.  Today the minimum you would pay would be around 225k.  If you really have a 180k property in Tempe that rents for 1800 a month, it would be considered a unicorn.  ;-)

  • Real Estate Investor · Peabody, MA · Member since 2013 · 304 posts · 91 votes
    9y
    The only way I would ever invest for "0" cash flow is if you do owner occupied multifamily and live for free. When you move out you'll make the profit of the unit you occupied
  • Investor · Chicago, IL · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    9y

    That could be dangerous and you may have to feed the property.  Some capital improvement will happen over the next ten years.  It's a mediocre business plan and you can't acquire too many properties with a zero cash flow.   That being said, if you want to invest in prime areas, low rates of returns are the norm.  Often you make money on appreciation and rental growth will occur over time.

  • Real Estate Professional · Dublin, OH · Member since 2013 · 251 posts · 165 votes
    9y
    Don't.....wait until it makes sense.. You buy at the top and lose in the near future. Not worth it.
  • Investor · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2010 · 739 posts · 372 votes
    9y

    Why are you taking 50% off your income projection?

  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland, OH · Member since 2015 · 255 posts · 248 votes
    9y
    Dalton Hirst have you considered looking outside of your market? A small shift or correction in the market can put you in the negative. I never rely on appreciation. Since you aren't going to self-manage the properties, I recommend looking outside of a college town with low rent to purchase ratio, and elsewhere where you're bringing in positive cash flow. For $180k, you can find two (C Grade) duplexes that cash flow ~$300 ea per month or four single family homes that cash flow ~$120 ea per month, after amortization, in my market.
  • Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes
    9y

    Hey @Chris Purcell I've been using that as a rule of thumb based on what I read in The book on rental Preoperty Investing and from the BP Podcast! Have you found different results based on the performance of your rentals?  

  • Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes
    9y

    @Jad Boudiab I wish I could find multi family in Phoenix! Duplexes especially have been tough to come by..then again I'm only searching loopnet. If I can network with some brokers I'm sure there are some off market duplexes I could find. 

    Honestly, very good point - since I'm factoring in mgmt. I can spread out and let the price/income ratio work to my benefit.

    Although a big factor for me starting out is starting as an owner occupied and then converting it after a year or two (take advantage of that fha)

    Thanks!

  • Investor · Mountain View, CA · Member since 2015 · 85 posts · 27 votes
    9y

    Hi Dalton,

    I took a cue from Sharad Mehta (podcast #155) last year and decided to start looking for properties in the Midwest to invest in. Listen to the podcast and you'll be inspired to hear that he had 50 paid off properties at time of the interview. I take a cheap flight to Chicago ($200) and drive to southern Michigan once a month to buy cheap houses. Right now I have a fourplex for sale in great condition that is a 2% property and all the major systems have already been changed out. I could never find anything similar here in the Bay Area. For years I was afraid to invest outside of my home town (Boise) but now I've discovered that by leaving home I have access to an overabundance of great moneymakers. It has also forced me to build my team very quickly because I don't live where I invest. Sharad looks at about 25 homes in a weekend when he travels to northern Indiana and then picks the best one or two. http://app.rehabvaluator.com/e2jUjg0b184A-H

    Jim Watts

  • Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes
    9y

    @James Watts I'm feeling inspired just reading this post! I will turn on that podcast tomorrow on my commute. The reason my margins are so small in my example is because I'm going to move from apartment living to my first property..take advantage of that FHA / 203k loan... But! As I expand, this is something that's been in the back of my mind for a potential strategy building a portfolio. I'd like to connect if you don't mind.. It may be down the road but I'd love to pick your brain about your experience investing long distance.

    Thanks! 

  • Investor · Mountain View, CA · Member since 2015 · 85 posts · 27 votes
    9y

    Glad it helps Dalton. Call me or email whenever you want.

    Jim Watts

  • Lockport , NY · Member since 2014 · 265 posts · 124 votes
    9y

    think "student rentals"! rent each bedroom (make sure you get the bank of mom and dad to co-sign)

  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2013 · 919 posts · 911 votes
    9y

    @Account Closed   Generally speaking, LoopNet is where all the "dogs" go to die.  You need to find a good agent that is investor friendly, in the area you are wanting to invest.  It will also give you a chance to reset your expectations and compare with reality.   

  • Victoria S.Pro Member
    Investor · Miami FL / DMV · Member since 2016 · 70 posts · 27 votes
    9y

    @Alan Grobmeier I've heard that loop net is where the dogs go to die before. What makes you say this? 

    I wonder how much of that is hearsay, since the MLS just funnels everything to sites like loopnet irrespective of their cap rate or location. So, its no different than MLS as far as I can tell. Do you know something else?

  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2013 · 919 posts · 911 votes
    9y

    @Victoria S. From what I understand and have heard, LoopNet is the very last place properties are offered. That means they have been picked over twice (pocket listings & then MLS) before making it to LoopNet.

  • Cebu City, Central Visayas · Member since 2017 · 3 posts · 2 votes
    9y

    It isn't really sure if your property wouls go up in value, right?

  • Chandler, AZ · Member since 2016 · 109 posts · 56 votes
    9y

    @John Audi Right I'm not assuming appreciation, so it would be a nice added bonus!

  • Investor · Philadelphia, PA · Member since 2010 · 739 posts · 372 votes
    9y
    Originally posted by @Account Closed:

    Hey @Chris Purcell I've been using that as a rule of thumb based on what I read in The book on rental Preoperty Investing and from the BP Podcast! Have you found different results based on the performance of your rentals?  

    Yes.  You will never buy anything based on those numbers

    Gross rent

    Less: PITI

    Less: Water/sewer

    What is your monthly net now?

  • Investor · Orange County, CA · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    9y
    Originally posted by @Chris Purcell:
    Originally posted by @Account Closed:

    Hey @Chris Purcell I've been using that as a rule of thumb based on what I read in The book on rental Preoperty Investing and from the BP Podcast! Have you found different results based on the performance of your rentals?  

    Yes.  You will never buy anything based on those numbers

    Gross rent

    Less: PITI

    Less: Water/sewer

    What is your monthly net now?

    Chris are you suggesting that you have some sort of magical rental property where stuff never wears out and needs to be repaired or replaced? If so, where do these magical properties exist ... I think I'd like to own some of them.

    In fairness, I'm also not a big fan of 50% rule for expenses, or 10% for CapEx or X% for anything other than maybe property taxes, or real estate commissions, etc. where the bill is actually computed as a percentage of value. 50% rule implies that the expenses for a 1200 SF house renting for $5000/mo in SF is $2500/mo, while the expenses for an identicle 1200 SF house renting for $1200/mo in Phoenix is $600/mo ... that's just silly. The expenses for each should be estimated, line by line, and item by item from the ground up ... after all, when you check out at home depot or ask a contractor for a bid, they don't ask what the place rents for before they calculate the bill, and neither should an investor :) ... and also a friendly reminder of a previous point made: cash flow is an important thing, but it is not the only thing ...

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.