Half of investors always think the sky is falling, and the other half always think prices can only go up. Both sides are right and both sides are wrong, and usually not for the reasons they think.
Yes, in most markets if you apply a standard finance metric like the p/e ratio, the returns don't make sense to invest. Most today are buying a stressful job (landlording) and not even getting paid for it.
Rent to value ratios in my market have been too low to buy off the MLS for a long time.
In some markets the R/V ratio is still good, but appreciation will most likely be less, reducing your overall IRR.
On the commercial side, cap rates have been compressed to about the same return as AAA corporate bonds. Since when did people start getting excited about 5% or less for this amount of risk and work?
But... back to residential- inventory is low keeping prices high in most markets. There is more demand than supply and millenials are forming families. Interest rates are low, freeing up capital. Barriers to entry (new construction) are high with permitting hurdles (here in the west anyway).
A lot has been discussed about whether we are in a bubble or not. Personally I am selling way more than buying.
What are some of your thoughts as a new finance grad @Tom Conant?
Half of investors always think the sky is falling, and the other half always think prices can only go up. Both sides are right and both sides are wrong, and usually not for the reasons they think.
the other issue with this thread or line of thought is timing the market. You can’t time the market and shouldn’t try to. The people looking for 2008 to happen again will be waiting a long time for it, and those who simply stay in the market over the long haul will be fine.
The market will almost always go up given a long enough period of time. Those who get killed in crashes are those who liquidate at bottom prices. In real estate make sure you have sufficient reserves and don’t over leverage. If you do that you should be fine
Russell. Thank you for the insight. Wouldn’t you agree it would be wise to attempt to figure out when each side is going to be right? Some might consider that gambling, but I call it being analytical. I would love to hear your thoughts. Thank you,
Tom
If two Nobel Lureates can not agree on the rationality of markets, Robert Shiller and Eugene Fama, two completely rational human beings and the smartest men in their field, then I do not see the point in trying to figure out when the completely unrational sides of this debate when they might be right or wrong. Any bull or bear will simply have confirmation bias on anything they read on the subject.
@Russell Brazil on top of that its all regional... what happens in one part of the country IE booming market another part could be falling through the floor.. its a big country with big states and ever moving economy and business interests... I think its interesting to see for example the rust belt cities re inventing themselves.. seems most have bottomed and are coming back up.
Easton PA Bethleham PA prime examples.
Another question of mine then would be, as experienced investors yourselves, do you find that good deals are becoming harder to find? Or are they simply just existent in other places? To quote that song my mom likes, when one door closes one more always opens, or something like that.
Thanks again for all the feedback!
Tom
Tom, thanks for starting a great thread. I would say that I am moderately bearish at this time. Deals are definitely becoming harder to find here in NE. The reason that I am moderately bearish is because I am a contrarian by temperament, recognize that market cycles last 7-10 years, and this unbridled growth will come to an end at some point. Whether it's a downturn or a crash remains uncertain, however I will say that I preparing for any downturns by:
1. Building 6 months of cash reserves for all my properties (buy and holds)
2. Not embarking on any capital spending/improvements (can wait till later)
3. Being very careful with offers (50%-60% LTV)
My view is that even if I am wrong (and I do hope I am wrong) about a future downturn, I will have significant capital amassed to rest easy at night.
@Tom Conant I think that it is tough to evaluate real estate with stock metrics for a couple of reasons.
1. most people don't buy stocks with loans, which changes the formula
2. a large portion of long term stock gains come in the form of dividends which are almost always lower than even mediocre rental property investments as a percentage of asset value
3. if there were to be a financial downturn depending on the area there may well be more people looking to rent homes because they can no longer afford to own thereby keeping rent prices more stable. In the same scenario people would cut back on consumer spending thus requiring many stocks to either pull back on dividends until the market improves or dip into their reserves to keep investors happy.
Just my two cents
@Tom Conant Precisely. I guess you can say that I am a lot less aggressive with offers, do not feed into the mania of "have to buy now or else will be priced out."
I would say that cap rates/cash flow are lower in southern NE because places like Boston Metro/Fairfield County, CT are doing well and there is greater investing activity. The deals are definitely out there, however require some extra leg work (more property evaluations, offers etc.).
Portland ME, Worcester MA, and New Haven CT are all good areas to look into. I would say that you should spent a few days in each city investigating neighborhoods, talking with RE professionals etc. Good luck!
The future does not belong to the pessimist
As @Russell Brazil said some people think the market is always about to crash, some people think it will never crash. Real estate markets are regional, and tangible. You make it sound like the whole thing will topple and nobody will have a house to live in. That's just not the way it works.
Most people are expecting a likely correction of unknown timing, and unknown impact. So that's the best anyone can predict: "Something negative might happen, sometime in the future".
Real estate is local. Many investors buy properties and in locations that are less susceptible to national market forces (and others add significant value through rehab or NOI improvements).
Many real estate investors had little impact during the last crash. My market values likely went down but my rents were fine...actually went up a little. All cycles are different though.
Woahhh @Mike Dymski. That's a curveball. See, I would have thought that with a market downturn your rental rates would go down but depending on where your properties are you could find investments with lower/inverse betas to the market would be a good way to mitigate portfolio risk. Also, @Jahan Habib that is precisely why I started this thread. I'm new to this so I can't afford the downside risk that most the investors on here can but I am also worried that I am going to miss the train so to speak.
Woahhh @Mike Dymski. That's a curveball. See, I would have thought that with a market downturn your rental rates would go down but depending on where your properties are you could find investments with lower/inverse betas to the market would be a good way to mitigate portfolio risk. Also, @Jahan Habib that is precisely why I started this thread. I'm new to this so I can't afford the downside risk that most the investors on here can but I am also worried that I am going to miss the train so to speak.
Rents in most markets strengthened during the housing collapse actually. It was a factor of simple supply and demand. With the foreclosure crisis homeowners became renters, with an increase in renters came an increase in demand and thus rents went up.
Also, to everyone saying that you cannot predict market then why are you in real estate investing? Should I simply pick 100 random properties and pick one from a hat? Probably not. Because you guys say its all about finding the best deals, the notion that you cannot predict the market doesn't make sense to me. How does one find deals while also disregarding future growth or decline of the market?
My proposition is, if one was able to bet against the spread so to speak by choosing the correct properties in the correct geography, you would able to beat the average RE market performance. In finance, your not cash flow positive until you beat the risk free investment (that being the federal funds rate or similar rate I think). As mentioned before, people are getting excited about %5 cap rates when there are almost riskless investments elsewhere in govt bonds and what not. Is there a similar metric in RE that one would try to analyze and choose their markets to surpass? Is that what Cap Rates are for? I don't mean to attack anyone's views and this is purely academic, but why wouldn't someone like myself invest in a Real Estate Investment Trust that already has an extremely diversified portfolio instead of looking into the market and trying to 'beat' the market by choosing the best investment properties? Am I talking in circles like a crazy person yet?
Thanks again for all the help and support people!
Tom
@Russell Brazil Thanks for being so active on my thread. From a cash flow perspective I wonder if most saw an appreciation in the overall value of their properties. The underlying equity value of your tenant based properties would have gone down while demand for the rental would have gone up. Hmm its actually a very nice juxtaposition. I bet if you broke down the cash flows my doomsday downside risk numbers would be a lot less critical if they included appreciation in rental incomes and the relatively less important depreciation in equity (as it doesn't impact cash flows immediately). Thank you for opening my eyes to this. I would love to hear what you have to say in regard to my other comment.
Thanks again for all your help,
Tom
Also, to everyone saying that you cannot predict market then why are you in real estate investing? Should I simply pick 100 random properties and pick one from a hat? Probably not. Because you guys say its all about finding the best deals, the notion that you cannot predict the market doesn't make sense to me. How does one find deals while also disregarding future growth or decline of the market?
My proposition is, if one was able to bet against the spread so to speak by choosing the correct properties in the correct geography, you would able to beat the average RE market performance. In finance, your not cash flow positive until you beat the risk free investment (that being the federal funds rate or similar rate I think). As mentioned before, people are getting excited about %5 cap rates when there are almost riskless investments elsewhere in govt bonds and what not. Is there a similar metric in RE that one would try to analyze and choose their markets to surpass? Is that what Cap Rates are for? I don't mean to attack anyone's views and this is purely academic, but why wouldn't someone like myself invest in a Real Estate Investment Trust that already has an extremely diversified portfolio instead of looking into the market and trying to 'beat' the market by choosing the best investment properties? Am I talking in circles like a crazy person yet?
Thanks again for all the help and support people!
Tom
5% is not a good benchmark. Many members won't get out of bed for less than a 15-20% return. Real estate investing is too much work to not achieve outpaced returns.
The cap rate is used to value commercial real estate...it's not a rate of return metric (it's also unleveraged). Profit comes from principal reduction, appreciation, cash flow, and tax benefits and many investors use IRR (or other metrics) to calculate their rate of return.
Lastly, many investors add value with rehab and/or improving NOI and drive the IRR way up. Comparing real estate investing with something like passive stock investing would be comparing apples to oranges. Owning a piece of rental real estate is like owning a small business, with income and expenses...people are just willing pay high multiples for it (i.e. your 5% cap rate, which is 20x earnings) because it is tangible and has been predictable over long periods.
Regarding market efficiency, the real estate market inefficient. There are motivated sellers and property problems that need solutions in every market cycle.
Also, to everyone saying that you cannot predict market then why are you in real estate investing? Should I simply pick 100 random properties and pick one from a hat? Probably not. Because you guys say its all about finding the best deals, the notion that you cannot predict the market doesn't make sense to me. How does one find deals while also disregarding future growth or decline of the market?
a person can predict the market with variance. To your original point, myself and many think there is a correction coming, but at what time and what amount and who it will effect is difficult to answer.
Your prediction is the market is broken. If I believed that I certainly wouldn't invest in real estate, or anything. I think things are going to go really well for people who are properly positioned to endure a correction of moderate variance. If things go worse than in 2008 then guess what, a lot of people will still make a lot of money.
Much of these doomsday threads are a bias of outlook. try to be more optimistic my friend ;)