FHA Househack Appreciation vs. Out of State Cashflow

FHA Househack Appreciation vs. Out of State Cashflow

Member since 2018 · 11 posts · 3 votes

Hey guys, 

I live in LA where appreciation is great but cashflow is not so good. I'm open to either house hack in LA (appreciation should be solid) or invest out of state for cashflow. From a financial perspective, how do I determine if I should pursue appreciation in LA first vs. cashflow out of state first? 

Also, would purchasing an out of state rental property eliminate my option to be approved for an FHA loan on a primary residence in LA later on? (in case I later choose to BRRR or househack in LA)?

Some helpful tips on how to think through a strategy and take the first steps would be awesome!

Thank you!

0Reply
31 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Broker · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2017 · 658 posts · 293 votes
7y

What's up Andrew, I'm a broker/investor in LA and Out Of State

Right now the price to rent ratio in LA isn't the best. You are correct about looking at it from an appreciation standpoint. I think in 10 years, prices today will look like a deal. I've done videos on the subject. 

You can buy OOS now and use an FHA loan later in CA -to answer that question. As long as you Owner Occupy, you can use FHA for approved properties. FHA for a BRRR might be harder to do. FHA has certain requirements to the condition of the property.

You have to make the decision, but here are some things to think about to help you through this.

Know that we are at ATH's in LA. Who knows when things will contract again before taking off higher, or what it will look like. Or if rents will contract with it. No one knows. So you've got to look at your situation. Some questions to ask yourself

Are you buying SFH to live in and rent rooms? You'll receive rental income and tax benefits, gain experience, and possibly see lower entry costs and lower risk. You could sell later and trade up or roll into multi

Buying multi family? If you live in one unit, you'll have the benefits mentioned above - on rented portions, and a larger asset. Make sure you can handle rent fluctuations, vacancies, repairs. Eventually you might move out and rent the entire thing 

If it's purely a rental, you could buy and might break even, but can you handle a 10% rent contraction? Not saying it's going to happen but it's good to build in tolerance or at least know you can handle it if it were to happen. 

If you need to buy using FHA, and owner occupy, your finances are already strained - in the context of such a big purchase - and with a large PI and MI, can you afford to build solid reserves?

I have purchased property that had "negative cash flow" in the past, the timing was right, I believed in the area, and had a plan. It has worked out extremely well. I'm not saying to do that or not do that now, just understand the circumstances and know your goals. This is a long term game for me, decide your strategy. 

Also be aware of RSO. There are around 118,000 "Rent Controlled" buildings in LA. I own some. They can be great, just have a plan. 

Also know that with prices so high, an FHA loan in LA right now is going to result in high principle, high interest, and mortgage insurance - this can make your idea to buy here, now, using FHA, become very expensive. Again who knows if we will see a major drop in prices.

OOS, you may or may not see the appreciation you see in LA, but you could have a solid duplex making you a few hundred bucks each month, and you get the tax benefits. You could go this route to save for a place here and either offset your living costs once you do buy here, or use the cashflow to continue building a portfolio. Is the RIO on OOS worth it to you? Factor in the tax benefits. 

Long term, I think CA wins, but you have to know that you will likely be anywhere from breaking even, not including tax benefits, at this time, to being in the negative if you go FHA at this time.

Short term, I think OOS will produce better returns right off. As far as appreciation goes, depends on where you buy and what happens in the future, but LA would be a safer bet for me

If you find a place in LA that fits your budget, you love it, and the math works, go get it. maybe you'll find a SFH with an ADU - or opportunity to add one. A lot of markets in transition here, and just a matter of time before more are also

DM me if you'd like to talk more. I grew up poor, no financial education, and I've learned to be creative to get things. Legally creative! Making money, saving, and strategizing

There is absolutely a way to do this. I think a lot of people see the math, the numbers, the graphs, whatever, and they say "no way".  Like others, I like to find way to figure out how.  

See this reply in the discussion

8 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Lender · Huntington Beach · Member since 2008 · 120 posts · 57 votes
    7y

    I think you have a pretty good handle on it. In LA there are not a lot of vacancies if you price your units reasonably, and as rents rise so do values.  Most investors in the LA area have income from other sources and are investing in it for appreciation as well as for tax reasons.

  • Rental Property Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2013 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    7y

    @Andrew S. House hacking is a much easier and safer place to begin and would no doubt be more profitable IF you can find a way to purchase in LA! The barrier to entry is the purchase price, down payment needed and affordability of the monthly mortgage payments.

  • Lee RipmaPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Prairie Village, KS · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7y

    @Andrew S.

    I could never get over the negative cash flow so I went the out of state cash flow route. Although I’m sure you could learn from house hacking you can also learn from out of state investing. In the end it’s just a personal decision, both can be good options if executed well!

  • Dan H.Pro Member
    Investor · Poway, CA · Member since 2015 · 7k+ posts · 8k+ votes
    7y
    Historically the return of Los Angeles RE would beat the return on virtually any OOS RE market. In coastal So Cal there is the initial cash flow and the actual cash flow. The actual cash flow increases at a rate that approximates the rent appreciation which in recent years has been great. Are you prepared to supplement initial negative cash flow to a time in the future when the RE has actual cash flow? What if this is 10 years from now? 15? The thing about FHA loans is that they allow real high LTV which allows a purchase with not a lot of capital. The downside is that the high LTV results in a high mortgage payment which negatively affects the cash flow. You could legitimately be looking at hundreds of dollars of negative cash flow per month and years before the cash flow becomes positive. Another thing about FHA is that they have higher standards than other conventional financing. Many of the best value add opportunities may not qualify for FHA financing. This reduces the chance for significant sweat equity. Are you prepared for years of hundreds of dollars of negative cash flow? If you can handle the negative cash flow, I have little doubt that Los Angeles will produce a good return over the long term (10+ years). Good luck
  • Real Estate Coach · Venice Beach, CA · Member since 2012 · 6k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    7y

    Well you can start easy-- just run the numbers. Look at options for both scenarios and see what the numbers look like. (Cash flow on a househack with an FHA anywhere in CA is not going to cash flow. There's no way around it.)

    But for general househacking considerations, check out-

    https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/considerations-...

    I don't see why going out-of-state would knock you out of FHA potential later (but I'm not a lender so I don't really know). But if you avoided an investment property in order to get an FHA in CA later, you're essentially *not* investing and getting those returns just so you can make an 'investment' later that is going to lose you money too. FHAs are terrible for investment returns, especially in high-priced markets like CA.

  • Rental Property Investor · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2017 · 210 posts · 155 votes
    7y

    If you're renting, you should find a 2+ unit that you can convert your rent expense to a mortgage. You can receive some rental income and then also gain experience as a landlord. 

  • Real Estate Broker · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2017 · 658 posts · 293 votes
    7y

    What's up Andrew, I'm a broker/investor in LA and Out Of State

    Right now the price to rent ratio in LA isn't the best. You are correct about looking at it from an appreciation standpoint. I think in 10 years, prices today will look like a deal. I've done videos on the subject. 

    You can buy OOS now and use an FHA loan later in CA -to answer that question. As long as you Owner Occupy, you can use FHA for approved properties. FHA for a BRRR might be harder to do. FHA has certain requirements to the condition of the property.

    You have to make the decision, but here are some things to think about to help you through this.

    Know that we are at ATH's in LA. Who knows when things will contract again before taking off higher, or what it will look like. Or if rents will contract with it. No one knows. So you've got to look at your situation. Some questions to ask yourself

    Are you buying SFH to live in and rent rooms? You'll receive rental income and tax benefits, gain experience, and possibly see lower entry costs and lower risk. You could sell later and trade up or roll into multi

    Buying multi family? If you live in one unit, you'll have the benefits mentioned above - on rented portions, and a larger asset. Make sure you can handle rent fluctuations, vacancies, repairs. Eventually you might move out and rent the entire thing 

    If it's purely a rental, you could buy and might break even, but can you handle a 10% rent contraction? Not saying it's going to happen but it's good to build in tolerance or at least know you can handle it if it were to happen. 

    If you need to buy using FHA, and owner occupy, your finances are already strained - in the context of such a big purchase - and with a large PI and MI, can you afford to build solid reserves?

    I have purchased property that had "negative cash flow" in the past, the timing was right, I believed in the area, and had a plan. It has worked out extremely well. I'm not saying to do that or not do that now, just understand the circumstances and know your goals. This is a long term game for me, decide your strategy. 

    Also be aware of RSO. There are around 118,000 "Rent Controlled" buildings in LA. I own some. They can be great, just have a plan. 

    Also know that with prices so high, an FHA loan in LA right now is going to result in high principle, high interest, and mortgage insurance - this can make your idea to buy here, now, using FHA, become very expensive. Again who knows if we will see a major drop in prices.

    OOS, you may or may not see the appreciation you see in LA, but you could have a solid duplex making you a few hundred bucks each month, and you get the tax benefits. You could go this route to save for a place here and either offset your living costs once you do buy here, or use the cashflow to continue building a portfolio. Is the RIO on OOS worth it to you? Factor in the tax benefits. 

    Long term, I think CA wins, but you have to know that you will likely be anywhere from breaking even, not including tax benefits, at this time, to being in the negative if you go FHA at this time.

    Short term, I think OOS will produce better returns right off. As far as appreciation goes, depends on where you buy and what happens in the future, but LA would be a safer bet for me

    If you find a place in LA that fits your budget, you love it, and the math works, go get it. maybe you'll find a SFH with an ADU - or opportunity to add one. A lot of markets in transition here, and just a matter of time before more are also

    DM me if you'd like to talk more. I grew up poor, no financial education, and I've learned to be creative to get things. Legally creative! Making money, saving, and strategizing

    There is absolutely a way to do this. I think a lot of people see the math, the numbers, the graphs, whatever, and they say "no way".  Like others, I like to find way to figure out how.  

  • Member since 2018 · 11 posts · 3 votes
    7y

    Thanks everyone! Will keep in touch if I have more questions related to this. Really appreciate the insight!

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.