More properties larger debt vs fewer properties zero debt

More properties larger debt vs fewer properties zero debt

Member since 2021 · 15 posts · 16 votes

What is everyone preference regarding having the option to own a handful of properties out right verses having a much larger portfolio with the debt that comes with it? Or do some people opt for a mix of both?

I assume the debt should always be covered by tenants however more is needed to to gain the cashflow from a handful outright.

7Reply
115 views

Most Popular Reply

Mechanicsburg, PA · Member since 2013 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
5y

@Robin Brown  Depends on your personal goals.  When I started out I borrowed as much as I could for as long as I could.  The first 11 properties I bought were 100% financed. Now, after buying and selling over 1,000 properties for my own inventory, of the last 118 properties I bought only 2 were bought with mortgages.  I bought the other 116 properties with zero financing and 100% cash. It all depends on you, your goals and where you are in your investing career. 

See this reply in the discussion

26 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2020 · 62 posts · 46 votes
    5y

    @Dennis Maynard if your client has zero debt on $15M of real estate, wouldn't it be cash flowing "extremely well" vs fairly well?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.