Investor · Tucson, AZ · Member since 2009 · 171 posts · 27 votes
16y
Taxes : $1446 Tax Year : 2007
50% rule
income/month $1250
expenses 50% of that - $625
debt service and pre-tax profit. $625
minus taxes of 120.50/mo -130 ($20.50 is 2007, not 2008) 495
minus insurance 400/year - 33
leaving to pay mortgage 462
Is that right?
I could carry a loan of 69141.48 with no pocket money. right?
My understanding of the 50% rule then is that at 1250 a month rent, I can just afford to pay $69141.48 for it.
The 2% rule does not work here, then, right?
Or is it that since the 1250/ .02=65500, is less than 69, but close, I offer $62500- repairs?
OR, what did I do wrong, what am I not understanding?
TIA
MRead
Real Estate Investor · Audubon, PA · Member since 2009 · 13k+ posts · 8k+ votes
16y
Originally posted by M Read:
Taxes : $1446 Tax Year : 2007
50% rule
income/month $1250
expenses 50% of that - $625
debt service and pre-tax profit. $625
minus taxes of 120.50/mo -130 ($20.50 is 2007, not 2008) 495
minus insurance 400/year - 33
leaving to pay mortgage 462
Is that right?
...
No, under the 50% rule, the taxes and insurance appear in the 50% of the rent that goes towards expenses; the debt service is just PI (Principle and Interest) and NOT PITI.
And your profit is what remains after the debt service, so typically you would allocate $100 per unit for profit (or cash flow), and then what remains is available to pay the loan.
Real Estate Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2009 · 61 posts · 32 votes
16y
I'm looking for a ex-bank CFO, Controller, Accountant, or banking consultant to help fill in the key details from a bank's perspective on the advantages of a Performing Loan vs. REO or non-Performing Loan.
I'm working on a simple solution to the real estate & banking crises and figured this site would be a great place to find a partner on this mission.
Investor · Kern county Riverside County, CA · Member since 2008 · 494 posts · 261 votes
16y
With the recent changes in mark to market the banks aren't penalized the same way they were before. There is almost an incentive now to not have the bad asset sell. When it sells as an REO is when they have to take the loss on their books. Until then, they can pretend they are solvent. I believe this was changed with the intention of drawing out the foreclosure releases for years to come so the banks don't continue to delfate the markets and their assets.