Newbie landlord faced with applicant that wants to live with his cousin.
Applicant in prescreening text message exchange revelas that he doesn't have a social security.
My qualification standards say that applicants should have a social security.
thats what I shared with other applicant ( the other cousin).
am i violating fair housing rules if I tell him. Are applicant are required to have a social security .
I am in chicago
I’ve taken people without SS numbers. They’ve been my best tenants and have stayed with me for years. Maybe only put the cousin on the lease. But you don’t need a SS number to evict if that’s what you’re worried about.
Do they have an ITIN?
@Aaron Zimmerman Im not sure, should I ask that? I thought ItIN is for taxes purposes. Can you do credit and background check with ItiN?
@Maya Jones I'm honestly not sure if you can do a background check with an itin. I don't see why not though
1) You can’t deny some people for not having a SSN and then accept someone else that also doesn’t have one. That’s a fair housing violation. (Or at least it could be seen as one if anyone you ever turned down was in a protected class.) You aren’t treating all applicants equally.
2) Why aren’t you requesting they get a SSN now? Are they independently wealthy and never intend to have a job or a bank account or pay taxes or apply for benefits?
3) How do you intend to find them if they don’t pay?
Worst case get a double security deposit, a higher rent/guest/occupany fee, and make the SSN holder the sole applicant and the other adult as a guest.
@Chris Seveney have you done credit and background check with ITIn ?
Why do you need their SSN? Is it for screening purposes? I would guess most screening software would allow for an alternate ID.
Newbie landlord faced with applicant that wants to live with his cousin.
Applicant in prescreening text message exchange revelas that he doesn't have a social security.
My qualification standards say that applicants should have a social security.
thats what I shared with other applicant ( the other cousin).
am i violating fair housing rules if I tell him. Are applicant are required to have a social security .
I am in chicago
@Ken M. Illegal allien?
All I know is that SSNs are issued at birth. When someone legally immigrates, they are issued a SSN. When someone doesn't have a SSN they aren't paying taxes. The govt. requires a SSN or ITN to pay taxes.
Mexicans (and others) used to be able to get a 6 month work permit to work in the USA. Then they had to go home for 6 months and could come back for another 6 month work permit.
I had a guy who had a degree in marine biology from the University of Mexico (not NEW Mexico, but Old Mexico) work as a carpenter. They he'd send a big chunk of it back to his family. To file his taxes he needed an ITN. His english was good and very professional.
But, with all of the fraud for the last number of years, who knows what has gone on since.
(An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) is a 9-digit tax processing number issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to individuals who are not eligible for a Social Security Number (SSN) but are required to file a U.S. federal income tax return. ITINs are used by non-resident and resident aliens, their spouses, and dependents, including undocumented immigrants, to comply with U.S. tax laws. The number always begins with the digit "9" and follows the format 9XX-XX-XXXX)
I’ve taken people without SS numbers. They’ve been my best tenants and have stayed with me for years. Maybe only put the cousin on the lease. But you don’t need a SS number to evict if that’s what you’re worried about.
@John Morgan thanks, how do you verify their credit or background without ss?
@John Morgan thanks, how do you verify their credit or background without ss?
Good question. And that they won't be deported in the middle of the month?
It is essential to adhere to your requirements. If applicants do not have a Social Security number or an ITIN, they unfortunately cannot proceed with their application. Establishing a clear and straightforward process can make a significant difference and help avoid any potential violations of fair housing laws.To ensure compliance, it's important to consistently apply your rental criteria to all applicants. This means clearly stating your requirements upfront and providing equal opportunities for all potential tenants. If you have any concerns about your policies potentially violating fair housing laws, it may be beneficial to consult with a legal expert or a fair housing organization to review your criteria and ensure they align with legal standards. Additionally, offering alternative options, like accepting an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) where possible, may help accommodate a wider range of applicants while still adhering to your qualification standards.
@Mackaylee Beach thanks for your insight. The tricky part is these are inherited tenants with no social. I am having to find replacement tenants and now I need to consider the income information for everyone old and new because they will split rent
so yes this person doesnt have ss and having a valid Ss is part of my requirement but I cannot do much about it ,he is already in the apartment. So would it be violating things If I screened him and verified income for the purpose or verifying that everyone can pay?
@Maya Jones I feel like an income verification is perfectly acceptable.
@Mackaylee Beach thanks for your insight. The tricky part is these are inherited tenants with no social. I am having to find replacement tenants and now I need to consider the income information for everyone old and new because they will split rent
so yes this person doesnt have ss and having a valid Ss is part of my requirement but I cannot do much about it ,he is already in the apartment. So would it be violating things If I screened him and verified income for the purpose or verifying that everyone can pay?
@Ken M. Im In chicago, lease contract is until april 2026 so can't really end the contract
@Maya Jones great follow-up, and it’s definitely a tricky spot when dealing with inherited tenants and changing household dynamics.
If someone is already living in the unit and you're trying to verify income as part of requalifying the household or adding or replacing tenants, it's reasonable to screen based on income and ability to pay, just be sure the same process applies to all adults being considered for tenancy, whether or not they have a Social Security number.
As long as your rental criteria are applied consistently and you're not selectively enforcing them, you should be on solid ground. If someone doesn’t have an SSN but can provide an ITIN and other supporting documentation, such as proof of income or references, that can often be a workable alternative depending on your screening service.
When in doubt, a quick consult with a local fair housing agency or housing attorney can give peace of mind. But no, verifying income to assess the household’s ability to pay generally isn’t a violation, especially when you're doing it across the board.
Hope that helps clarify things
@Maya Jones great follow-up, and it’s definitely a tricky spot when dealing with inherited tenants and changing household dynamics.
If someone is already living in the unit and you're trying to verify income as part of requalifying the household or adding or replacing tenants, it's reasonable to screen based on income and ability to pay, just be sure the same process applies to all adults being considered for tenancy, whether or not they have a Social Security number.
As long as your rental criteria are applied consistently and you're not selectively enforcing them, you should be on solid ground. If someone doesn’t have an SSN but can provide an ITIN and other supporting documentation, such as proof of income or references, that can often be a workable alternative depending on your screening service.
When in doubt, a quick consult with a local fair housing agency or housing attorney can give peace of mind. But no, verifying income to assess the household’s ability to pay generally isn’t a violation, especially when you're doing it across the board.
Hope that helps clarify things
Thank you! Unfortunately, the existing tenant who has been paying doesn't have a SSN or ITIN and Rentredi ( who uses Transunion) says I cannot do a standard screening.
So in this case I am asking for paystubs, bank account statements, w2s etc.
so I can verify their ability to pay the rent. So in a sense I am allowing somboedy without a SSN to become an applicant. This is my first time screening tenants so I guess I am setting a precedent for future applicants without SSN. I would treat them the same ?
I accept tenants all the time without social security numbers. I would be very careful about saying you don’t accept people without social security numbers. Just say you must past credit/background checks. I’ve run credit checks on people with ITIN numbers but don’t have social security numbers. In Illinois at least, you can’t discriminate based on legal status for housing.
Try running them through American Apartment Owners Association.
If they have an ITIN number you should be able to get a credit report.
Without an ITIN, you can’t get a credit score, but you should still be able to do a basic background based on name and address. You can call them to double check.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Patrick O'Sullivan thanks.
so saying that someone without social or Itin will be disqualified, is that considered violating fair housing laws?
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Patrick O'Sullivan thanks.
so saying that someone without social or Itin will be disqualified, is that considered violating fair housing laws?
@Maya Jones under federal Fair Housing rules, turning someone away just because they do not have a Social Security Number or ITIN can be a concern. The most important thing is to focus on clear and consistent criteria like income, rental history, and background checks, rather than a specific form of identification.
Instead of saying that applicants must have a Social Security Number or ITIN, a better approach might be to say:
"All applicants must pass income verification, rental history, and background screening. Applicants without a Social Security Number or ITIN may provide other documents to show identity and ability to pay."
This approach helps ensure your process is fair, clear, inclusive, and in line with housing guidelines.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
@Patrick O'Sullivan thanks.
so saying that someone without social or Itin will be disqualified, is that considered violating fair housing laws?
@Patrick O'Sullivan thanks, that line came from Brandon Turner book... I guess I should remove it from the qualification standard
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
I have to disagree here. I’ve had far worse issues with US citizens. Non US Citizens or not, it’s very hard to get people to pay when they bounce.
If they have a tax ID and have been here for a little bit, you can also pull a credit score.
Illinois and Chicago you can’t discriminate based on immigration status. But you can deny for credit, income, etc. So if they can’t pass your screening criteria, you can deny them.
Problem solved.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
I have to disagree here. I’ve had far worse issues with US citizens. Non US Citizens or not, it’s very hard to get people to pay when they bounce.
If they have a tax ID and have been here for a little bit, you can also pull a credit score.
Illinois and Chicago you can’t discriminate based on immigration status. But you can deny for credit, income, etc. So if they can’t pass your screening criteria, you can deny them.
Problem solved.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
I have to disagree here. I’ve had far worse issues with US citizens. Non US Citizens or not, it’s very hard to get people to pay when they bounce.
If they have a tax ID and have been here for a little bit, you can also pull a credit score.
Illinois and Chicago you can’t discriminate based on immigration status. But you can deny for credit, income, etc. So if they can’t pass your screening criteria, you can deny them.
Problem solved.
I agree with this. The more information you have the better in terms of leverage.
I will say, an eviction should still show up on a court record search as long as you got the applicants identification.
I understand the apprehension behind not wanting to rent to people without social security numbers. I was like that in the beginning. However I invested in an area that was heavily immigrant based. So I would have unnecessarily increased my vacancy rate if I didn’t accept people without social security numbers.
@Maya Jones You're right to think about how this sets a precedent moving forward, especially in a city like Chicago, where fair housing protections are taken seriously.
If you're allowing someone without an SSN to apply by submitting alternative documentation like pay stubs, bank statements, or W2s, that’s a valid approach, as long as it’s applied consistently to all applicants. In Chicago, you cannot deny someone housing based on immigration status, so focusing your screening on income and ability to pay is both fair and compliant.
To avoid any confusion down the line, it’s a good idea to update your written rental criteria to reflect that applicants without an SSN or ITIN can still qualify by providing sufficient proof of income and supporting documentation. That way, you're setting clear expectations and protecting yourself by treating every applicant by the same standard.
You're on the right track by documenting income and verifying financial stability. Consistency and transparency are key.
Hope this helps as you navigate your next steps
@Ken M. I hear your concerns, and they are valid from a risk management perspective. The core point behind the guidance in Chicago is that housing decisions must be based on financial qualifications, rental history, and behavior, not on immigration status. This means landlords cannot use lack of legal status alone as a reason to deny housing.
As for your questions:
Rent collection – If the tenant is paying rent consistently and can verify income, the lack of a Social Security Number does not prevent them from fulfilling that obligation.
Eviction – Eviction is based on lease violations or non-payment, not immigration status. Legal eviction processes can still be followed, even without an SSN.
Personal property – Like with any tenant who leaves unexpectedly, standard procedures for abandonment or storage laws would apply. These are usually outlined in state landlord-tenant laws.
Damages – Just as with any tenant, collecting for damages depends on documentation, deposits, and sometimes legal action. While an SSN can help with collections, it is not the only tool available.
The key takeaway is this: landlords are still able to screen applicants based on their ability to pay and follow the lease. The challenge is adjusting policies so they are legally compliant while still protecting your investment. Clear, consistent screening criteria and proper documentation go a long way.
Hope this helps clarify the reasoning behind the policy.
I have to disagree here. I’ve had far worse issues with US citizens. Non US Citizens or not, it’s very hard to get people to pay when they bounce.
If they have a tax ID and have been here for a little bit, you can also pull a credit score.
Illinois and Chicago you can’t discriminate based on immigration status. But you can deny for credit, income, etc. So if they can’t pass your screening criteria, you can deny them.
Problem solved.
I agree with this. The more information you have the better in terms of leverage.
I will say, an eviction should still show up on a court record search as long as you got the applicants identification.
I understand the apprehension behind not wanting to rent to people without social security numbers. I was like that in the beginning. However I invested in an area that was heavily immigrant based. So I would have unnecessarily increased my vacancy rate if I didn’t accept people without social security numbers.
Ignore the responses that are not from local investors, in Chicago an eviction takes 8+ months so you should NEVER take on any risky tenants. Not sure where your property is but on northside tons of 700+ credit tenants for every vacancy so no need to take risks, I am strict on who accept and never even had a late tenant. Using an ITIN or other form of ID without SS number is a red flag for higher likelihood of fraud and we have seen many fake applicants lately. Do serious due diligence to make sure they do not have a stolen identity or it can cost you up to a year of lost rents and the eviction costs. Chicago has laws where you can not discriminate on legal status so need to be careful how you respond and likely cannot deny solely for the lack of a SS.
@Henry Lazerow hi Henry thanks for the response. I woule love to connect , can I message you?
Ignore the responses that are not from local investors, in Chicago an eviction takes 8+ months so you should NEVER take on any risky tenants. Not sure where your property is but on northside tons of 700+ credit tenants for every vacancy so no need to take risks, I am strict on who accept and never even had a late tenant. Using an ITIN or other form of ID without SS number is a red flag for higher likelihood of fraud and we have seen many fake applicants lately. Do serious due diligence to make sure they do not have a stolen identity or it can cost you up to a year of lost rents and the eviction costs. Chicago has laws where you can not discriminate on legal status so need to be careful how you respond and likely cannot deny solely for the lack of a SS.
Bottom line is framing your denial around a failure to meet the financial/historic criteria rather than the lack of a specific document (SSN). I agree with @Henry Lazerow that risk mitigation must remain the top priority.
@Patrick O'Sullivan thanks a lot for your input
Newbie landlord faced with applicant that wants to live with his cousin.
Applicant in prescreening text message exchange revelas that he doesn't have a social security.
My qualification standards say that applicants should have a social security.
thats what I shared with other applicant ( the other cousin).
am i violating fair housing rules if I tell him. Are applicant are required to have a social security .
I am in chicago
Did you end up going with these tenants?
@Sean McKee still ongoing, waiting for verification from rent redi ...
this application has taken up many hours of my time haha
Write down your screening criteria in detail.
Post it on your office wall, and refer to it often. Feel free to give copies to your applicants.
Do not deviate from your stated criteria unless there are mitigating or compensating circumstances.
For example, before the law was changed, credit reporting agencies would knock FICO down with hospital collections. We often overlooked that if the collections were older than a few years, and if the rest of the credit report were favorable.
Not permitted by law to ask about citizenship? I'd move my investment to a more favorable location.