Rental Property Investor · Moline, IL · Member since 2017 · 45 posts · 28 votes
In today's markets, do you find yourself still shooting for the 2% rule? Do you focus on a 5, 7, or even a 10% cap after all expenses? Do you focus on $200 a door?
As investors, what deals/numbers are striking you to eagerly pursue a deal?
What numbers turn you away from a property?
I understand all markets are different, but I would like to see what today's investors shoot for! Please provide your goal-driven number as well as the market those numbers apply to!
Real Estate Agent · Joplin, MO · Member since 2018 · 112 posts · 96 votes
7y
@Shaye Mora I’ve got relatively inexpensive SFRs in the 1.3% range and a small duplex around 1.6%. Personally, would rather have a 1% deal in a good location or property I’m proud of than a 2%+ war zone bomb. Depends on your strategy.
@Dennis M. 3-4% ?? So you're getting a property for $50k and getting $1500-$2000 a month rent for it? Is this a multi or SFH or both?
I’ve never paid that much ! but yeah ive got 1500 rent on 35k in multi and 625 on 10k single . 950 on 22k duplex’s . Houses are cheap where I invest . Very common to get 3-4% here on off market deals . Just got to poke around without using the mls .
Rental Property Investor · The Vampire State · Member since 2013 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
7y
If you are willing to buy a distressed property, the sky is the limit when it comes to ROI. Perhaps consider a deal that needs work, where you can put some sweat equity in early in your career while you wait for the market to turn.
Rental Property Investor · Boston, MA · Member since 2019 · 134 posts · 50 votes
7y
1% is most up and coming markets are there but hard to find - if you are getting anything above that you are in very small submarkets and most likely picking up distressed properties. Folks getting 3-4% sounds like an anomaly bur sign me up.
Investor · San Diego, CA · Member since 2016 · 265 posts · 305 votes
7y
Shaye Mora
If you are achieving 2% or better in the investor-friendly states these days, it probably comes with higher vacancy over the long haul and/or is C- or D-class.
Rental Property Investor · Erie, PA · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 2k+ votes
7y
In my PA market I shoot for 2% and have always met that number. I'm looking at relocating and am sitting in my hotel room in MO (viewed/will be viewing properties yesterday and today). Since it's going to be a FHA-loan I am pickier with the property as I'll be living there for a year or two. And a nicer area of course typically means less cash flow.
With the properties I'm looking at to live in (B-class and up) I see 1%-1.2% if they accept a lower offer (a few are priced too high and a few are reasonable but I will of course offer lower).
Though when it comes to the properties in this MO market I would be buying and renting out (C-class), 1.5% is fairly simple and 2% can be done if I am patient.
Rental Property Investor · Leander, TX · Member since 2018 · 183 posts · 264 votes
7y
I aim for maximum cash on cash return. 12-15% in the market where I invest (Cleveland). Rent to value ratio is fun to look at but ultimately incidental.
Rental Property Investor · Ankeny, IA · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 3k+ votes
7y
@Shaye Mora
1% here, if a duplex and landlord pays zero utilities, garbage, lawn, etc. 1.5% if bigger and the meters not divided and I pay for water, heat, etc. I thought I wanted 2% and up, but those areas are low C and D, and I didn’t want the hassle. 3% is 0% if tenants don’t actually pay the rent. That being said, I’ve been outbid all this year when people are accepting 0.7% (with rents at market rate).
Rental Property Investor · Hummelstown, PA · Member since 2015 · 638 posts · 653 votes
7y
There’s some nuances that (it seems) 99% of people don’t pay attention to.
To me, rent to value is defined as:
Rent=Monthly Rent (duh)
Value=the final value of the property, on which you borrow 75-80% typically
This is important because in order for the metric to work it must reflect your cash flow.
I know a lot of people who mis-use this metric by using purchase price instead of value.
For example: “I bought a property for $40k and it rents for $800 whoop whoop 2%”
But what those people don’t think to consider is that they put in another $40k in rehab, now the property is worth (value) $100k. So they do a cash out refinance for 80% of 100k.
This is not a 2% property...it’s 0.8%
So, moral of the story when evaluating properties, look at market rents divided by ARV (as a first pass only) to determine cash flow potential.
There’s some nuances that (it seems) 99% of people don’t pay attention to.
To me, rent to value is defined as:
Rent=Monthly Rent (duh)
Value=the final value of the property, on which you borrow 75-80% typically
This is important because in order for the metric to work it must reflect your cash flow.
I know a lot of people who mis-use this metric by using purchase price instead of value.
For example: “I bought a property for $40k and it rents for $800 whoop whoop 2%”
But what those people don’t think to consider is that they put in another $40k in rehab, now the property is worth (value) $100k. So they do a cash out refinance for 80% of 100k.
This is not a 2% property...it’s 0.8%
So, moral of the story when evaluating properties, look at market rents divided by ARV (as a first pass only) to determine cash flow potential.
Good post, Kyle! I agree with you fully. You have to look at the ARV. You can't base the 2% off a house that isn't rent ready.
All the houses I seek are rent ready properties, with small interior fixes! The 2% isn't the main focus of the investment. It's a quick check to see where the property stands, then you dive deep into the ROI after all expenses.
Real Estate Investor · Saint Paul, MN · Member since 2017 · 543 posts · 474 votes
7y
@Shaye Mora 2% does not exist in the Twin Cities area with the possible exception of the very worst areas. Even 1% is a stretch unless you do a lot of work yourself on a place that you get cheap due to its condition (cheap being relative) But the Twin Cities is an expensive market.
But what those people don’t think to consider is that they put in another $40k in rehab, now the property is worth (value) $100k. So they do a cash out refinance for 80% of 100k.
This is not a 2% property...it’s 0.8%
But that's just one snapshot, a flipper's view that doesn't take into account the renters buying it for you. As a buy n hold, I look at the end of a 15 year mortgage for my long term return.
In today's markets, do you find yourself still shooting for the 2% rule? Do you focus on a 5, 7, or even a 10% cap after all expenses? Do you focus on $200 a door?
As investors, what deals/numbers are striking you to eagerly pursue a deal?
What numbers turn you away from a property?
I understand all markets are different, but I would like to see what today's investors shoot for! Please provide your goal-driven number as well as the market those numbers apply to!
Depends on market, but here in KC I aim for 1% when doing quick test. Then 7% cap rate, and 9-10%+ cash on cash return. I'm originally from Seattle and it's more speculative there with maybe the 0.5% rule and 4-5% cap rate. Playing the appreciation game there in the short run.