Kansas City Tenant Bill of Rights

Kansas City Tenant Bill of Rights

Andrew SyriosPro Member
Moderator
Residential Real Estate Investor · Kansas City, MO · Member since 2014 · 10k+ posts · 5k+ votes

Hello fellow Kansas City investors and property managers (and everyone else for that matter), I think it's important to make you aware of the Kansas City Mayor's Special Committee on Housing Policy which will be holding its second meeting on the proposed Kansas City Tenant Bill of Rights. Some of what's in the bill is fine and a lot is already law. But some of it is really bad. Most notably are prohibitions on screening for evictions or felonies unless "unless the landlord can demonstrate the rental decision was based on all information available including consideration of the frequency, recentness, and severity of a criminal record." Talk about vague!

The latest version seems to have been softened a bit (you can see it here). You can also see my longer critique here. But I would recommend coming to the next meeting at that Kansas City, MO City Hall at 414 E 12th St., 26th Floor Council Chambers on Wednesday, November 13th at 4:00. (Event page is here.)

I would also recommend getting involved with Landlord Inc. and @Michelle Winberry's group the KC Regional Housing Alliance in general.

Of course there are bad landlords and tenants need some protection. But property owners also need reasonable laws that allow us to protect ourselves, our businesses, our employees, our contractors and our other residents. Not being able to screen for felonies (or being severely hampered in doing so) would, among other things, put other residents at serious risk in certain situations. Please join us on the 13th if you can and let the housing committee hear your opinion. You can find there work emails here (please be respectful and pithy). 

9Reply
138 views

Most Popular Reply

Kansas City, MO · Member since 2019 · 4 posts · 8 votes
6y

As a wind energy developer with a lot of experience dealing with restrictive wind-related zoning ordinances, I can tell you that industry participation is critical. County commissioners, or in this case city council members, can be easily swayed by an emotional crowd, especially if no one is there providing level-headed facts. If you were in the council's place facing that room, and no one from the industry seemed to care enough to defend itself, wouldn't the easier thing be to give in to the people getting upset with you? The answer is yes and it happens all the time in my field.

@Nic S. makes a good point as well. When one county makes a restrictive ruling, they make it a lot easier for the one next door to do the same. In fact they've written the road map to follow.

Echoing @Andrew Syrios' call to action here that anyone with relevant experience should plan 2 minutes of testimony to speak next Wednesday at 4pm. 

See this reply in the discussion

35 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Rental Property Investor · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2013 · 919 posts · 911 votes
    6y

    I guess felonies are a new protected class?  I’m surprised to see KC try to turn into Cali.  :-(

  • Andrew SyriosPro Member
    Moderator
    OP
    Residential Real Estate Investor · Kansas City, MO · Member since 2014 · 10k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    6y
    Originally posted by @Nic S.:

    @Andrew Syrios how’d the meeting go?

    Hey Nic, not bad. They watered down the nonsense so you can still screen as long as you take into account the recency, severity, mitigating factors and personal references. Where the lines are on that. Who knows? But probably just being very specific in your criteria instead of just "no evictions, no felonies" will do the trick. You can still turn down Section 8 with the new bill, but you have to consider all legal sources of income as income (i.e. child support, etc.). You don't have to provide a utility estimate but you do have to give contact info for all the utility companies in their area (we already do this). The rest was pretty much left as is. The bill passed the subcommittee and will be voted on shortly and certainly pass. But this version is tolerable. Although I expect there will be more battles to come. That being said, we property owners have some clear lines in the sand and I think they all know that. (Landlords outnumbered tenant advocates probably two or three to one.) Mayor Lucas seemed very reasonable about it as well. So overall, I think the outcome was as good as could be expected.

  • Nic S.Pro Member
    Danville. CA · Member since 2017 · 313 posts · 221 votes
    6y

    thank you @Andrew Syrios

  • Member since 2018 · 127 posts · 106 votes
    6y

    @Andrew Syrios, thank you for the update.  I moved out of Kansas City in July and have a single rental with sights on more.  I am glad that they toned down some of the language here.  Where can you find the final proposal?

  • Andrew SyriosPro Member
    Moderator
    OP
    Residential Real Estate Investor · Kansas City, MO · Member since 2014 · 10k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    6y

     Sure thing Brian. Yeah, overall what they passed is mostly redundant with current law. Which makes me think the biggest problem is that most tenants don't know what the current law is.

  • Olathe, KS · Member since 2017 · 2 posts · 0 votes
    6y
    Originally posted by @Andrew Syrios:
    Originally posted by @Nic S.:

    @Andrew Syrios how’d the meeting go?

    Hey Nic, not bad. They watered down the nonsense so you can still screen as long as you take into account the recency, severity, mitigating factors and personal references. Where the lines are on that. Who knows? But probably just being very specific in your criteria instead of just "no evictions, no felonies" will do the trick. You can still turn down Section 8 with the new bill, but you have to consider all legal sources of income as income (i.e. child support, etc.). You don't have to provide a utility estimate but you do have to give contact info for all the utility companies in their area (we already do this). The rest was pretty much left as is. The bill passed the subcommittee and will be voted on shortly and certainly pass. But this version is tolerable. Although I expect there will be more battles to come. That being said, we property owners have some clear lines in the sand and I think they all know that. (Landlords outnumbered tenant advocates probably two or three to one.) Mayor Lucas seemed very reasonable about it as well. So overall, I think the outcome was as good as could be expected.

     Completely agree, much more tolerable now.  I think all involved on the council committee did a good job of resolving the major issues and watering down others for interpretation in future circumstances.  I wasn't able to make the meeting, but just watched it in its entirety as its now online:  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw7U7ONgEc8

  • Andrew SyriosPro Member
    Moderator
    OP
    Residential Real Estate Investor · Kansas City, MO · Member since 2014 · 10k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    6y

    I think they realized the chaos the original bill would have caused (and they got a huge amount of blowback). But I'm sure there will be more of this kind of thing in the near future.

  • Rental Property Investor · Seattle, WA · Member since 2014 · 43 posts · 19 votes
    6y
    According to this "article" we have to give 234 hours notice to enter the property (haha, obviously a typo, is 24)
    https://www.kctv5.com/news/loc...
    Here's the ordinance, which apparently becomes effective on June 1,2020.
    http://cityclerk.kcmo.org/Live...

    Suzanne

  • Investor · Indianapolis, IN · Member since 2015 · 394 posts · 116 votes
    6y

    Hey guys! Any known updates on this? I've been trying to follow along for a while now, and have heard there were some compromises, but not entirely sure where things stand. This is the latest article I've found, but I'm not entirely sure how accurate (or "legit," for that matter, given that it's not even a KC source haha) it is.

    Any updates from anyone that's been more in tuned with the outcomes so far?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.