Chicago Ordinance Conflict: x days notice vs d 90 days conflict

Chicago Ordinance Conflict: x days notice vs d 90 days conflict

Member since 2025 · 11 posts · 4 votes

Hi, 

It seems tenants with 6 months leases require 30 days notice,  6 months to 3 years 60 days notice, and 3+ years require 120 days notice.   However,  they don't have to respond until 90 days before that deadline.  Is that a true assessment of the Ordinance?  This seems to override the 30 days and 60 days noted, see below. 

(i) Notice or Renewal of Rental Agreement. No tenant shall be required to renew a rental agreement more than 90 days prior to the termination date of the rental agreement. If the landlord violates this subsection, the tenant shall recover one month's rent or actual damages, whichever is greater.



OP: Above is the 90 day requirement with no contingency on tenancy length.  Tenant damages can include attorney fees (ouch).


(j) Notice or Refusal to Renew Rental Agreement. Provided that the landlord has not terminated the rental agreement under Section 5-12-130(a), (b), or (d), or that the dwelling unit has not been deemed abandoned under Section 5-12-130(e) hereof, the following notice requirements shall apply:

(1) For any residential tenancy of less than six months, the landlord shall notify the tenant in writing at least 30 days prior to the stated termination date of the rental agreement of the landlord's intent to terminate a periodic tenancy, not renew a fixed-term rental agreement or increase the rental rate. If the landlord fails to give the required written notice, the tenant may remain in the dwelling unit for up to 60 days after the date on which written notice is given to the tenant, regardless of the termination date specified in the notice or in an existing rental agreement. During such occupancy, the terms and conditions of the tenancy shall be the same as the terms and conditions during the month of tenancy immediately preceding the notice; provided, however, that if rent was waived or abated in the preceding month or months as part of the original rental agreement, the rental amount during such 60-day period shall be at the rate established on the last date that a full rent payment was made.

OP:  This is at variance with the 90 day noted above.


(2) For any residential tenancy of six months to three years, the landlord shall notify the tenant in writing at least 60 days prior to the stated termination date of the rental agreement of the landlord's intent to terminate a periodic tenancy, not renew a fixed-term rental agreement or increase the rental rate. If the landlord fails to give the required written notice, the tenant may remain in the dwelling unit for up to 60 days after the date on which written notice is given to the tenant, regardless of the termination date specified in the notice or in an existing rental agreement. During such occupancy, the terms and conditions of the tenancy shall be the same as the terms and conditions during the month of tenancy immediately preceding the notice; provided, however, that if rent was waived or abated in the preceding month or months as part of the original rental agreement, the rental amount during such 60-day period shall be at the rate established on the last date that a full rent payment was made.



OP: This is at variance with the 90 day noted above.


(3) For any residential tenancy greater than three years, the landlord shall notify the tenant in writing at least 120 days prior to the stated termination date of the rental agreement of the landlord's intent to terminate a periodic tenancy, not renew a fixed-term rental agreement or increase the rental rate. If the landlord fails to give the required written notice, the tenant may remain in the dwelling unit for up to 120 days after the date on which written notice is given to the tenant, regardless of the termination date specified in the notice or in an existing rental agreement. During such occupancy, the terms and conditions of the tenancy shall be the same as the terms and conditions during the month of tenancy immediately preceding the notice; provided, however, that if rent was waived or abated in the preceding month or months as part of the original rental agreement, the rental amount during such 120-day period shall be at the rate established on the last date that a full rent payment was made.


OP: Based on the above,  a tenant with 3 years lease, doesn't have to respond until 90 days before the new rate applies. Otherwise, we have to pay 1 month lease and damages ( aka, attorney fees)

Do you have comments on the above?  It seems the Ordinance is poorly written, unless I am missing something here. 

Thanks, 


1Reply
170 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
8mo

Sorry may of misunderstood your question. We go off the 30/60/120 notice rules and never seen issues (contact attorney if really concerned to confirm, most will help with quick questions like that for free if used them for the closing). That 90 day statement I believe is for renewals, just do not ever renew and always send a cancellation notice with an offer to do a new lease at higher price. There is no requirement to wait for them to respond to that new higher price lease offer after the cancellation notice and the offer can be rescinded at any time. 

See this reply in the discussion

9 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Property Manager · Lombard, IL · Member since 2013 · 100 posts · 82 votes
    8mo

    It's Chicago, everything is as clear as mud on purpose. 

  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8mo

    There is no rent control or renewal laws in Chicago thankfully. You just need to give notice X days and it does not require a response, you can ask 120 days in advance by saying your lease is not renewed but we can do a new lease at X price. As a landlord you are able to rescind that offer at any time with no consequences even within days as long as the former tenant has not signed a new lease with you yet. You should always raise rents at least to inflation rate and never just renew an old lease, so I have never seen this in real life cause an issue for myself or any clients. 

    • Member since 2025 · 11 posts · 4 votes
      8mo
      Quote from @Henry Lazerow:

      There is no rent control or renewal laws in Chicago thankfully. You just need to give notice X days and it does not require a response, you can ask 120 days in advance by saying your lease is not renewed but we can do a new lease at X price. As a landlord you are able to rescind that offer at any time with no consequences even within days as long as the former tenant has not signed a new lease with you yet. You should always raise rents at least to inflation rate and never just renew an old lease, so I have never seen this in real life cause an issue for myself or any clients. 

      The post is about a conflict in X day notice requirements. As written, it seems to require 90 days are required no matter how long they had been in the unit.  

      One can argue that no response is rejection of the offer, but that's not very clear 



  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8mo

    Sorry may of misunderstood your question. We go off the 30/60/120 notice rules and never seen issues (contact attorney if really concerned to confirm, most will help with quick questions like that for free if used them for the closing). That 90 day statement I believe is for renewals, just do not ever renew and always send a cancellation notice with an offer to do a new lease at higher price. There is no requirement to wait for them to respond to that new higher price lease offer after the cancellation notice and the offer can be rescinded at any time. 

    • Member since 2025 · 11 posts · 4 votes
      8mo
      Quote from @Henry Lazerow:

      Sorry may of misunderstood your question. We go off the 30/60/120 notice rules and never seen issues (contact attorney if really concerned to confirm, most will help with quick questions like that for free if used them for the closing). That 90 day statement I believe is for renewals, just do not ever renew and always send a cancellation notice with an offer to do a new lease at higher price. There is no requirement to wait for them to respond to that new higher price lease offer after the cancellation notice and the offer can be rescinded at any time. 


       Thanks. I may be overthinking this... I have 3+ year tenants that need a serious increase (20%).  I bet one of them will reach out to a tenant support group (PITA personality) so I need to have this very clear and ready to respond.

      Honestly, I like the 90-day notice. This way I can prepare ahead of time.  

      Thanks

  • Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8mo

    The confusion and conflict is deliberate by the city government in order to create traps for landlords. Give a 150 day notice of termination and offer to renew at your increased rent. Sounds excessive and it is, but it’s the only way for you to be absolutely free of trouble.

  • Member since 2025 · 11 posts · 4 votes
    8mo

    Update,

    After reading this thing again, it says...

    more than 90 days prior to the termination date of the rental agreement

    It doesn't say "less"

    So, it can't be more than 90, meaning a 120 day notice can't be executed until 90 days before.

    However a 60 an d90 days can be at 90 days or even less. 


    All good here. 

  • Jonathan KlemmBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Contractor · Chicago, IL · Member since 2016 · 4k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8mo

    Hey There @Ted Smith - I'm not a Chicago lease rental expert, but @Brie Schmidt or @Mark Ainley may be able to provide some helpful insight.

    I'm following this post because I'm interested in the answers.

    Also, just to help get what you need.  Do you have a specific scenario that you are going through with one of your properties?

  • Bo SmithPro Member
    Hinton, WV · Member since 2026 · 1k+ posts · 373 votes
    8mo

    You're right - that 90-day response window conflicts with the earlier notice periods and gives tenants way more leverage than intended. Creates a real planning headache when you need certainty months out. Are local courts interpreting this as tenant-friendly as it reads?

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.