Scranton is a value trap. The local government brags that their code enforcement drives electric cars while they have pot holes you could lose a small child in.
Well… I have seen way better RTP ratios in Cleveland, other areas in Pennsylvania, Indiana, Georgia, etc… I wonder why these cities were chosen? The article so far is not clear if this was a more inclusive list that weigh population growth, economics and market strength or just their opinion… I am from CA and if I were to buy outside of here, it would be for better cash flow and .70 to .83 RTP ratios just do not cut it… Thanks
Scranton is a value trap. The local government brags that their code enforcement drives electric cars while they have pot holes you could lose a small child in.
Is the Rent-to-price ratio discussed in this article different than the price to rent ratio I see discussed elsewhere? If so is a ratio less than 1.0 good? …Like what was shown in the Syracuse market?
thank you for this article. I like the numbers, and information. Im curious, where can we look to do our market research on these to get in depth look.