this is what i have never understood, i have more than enough money to buy a propety for cash. so i am convinced to "use other peoples money" or to get a loan to leverage your money. I sorta get that. What I dont understand is why lenders ask and require so much information in order to get a loan that i dont need anyway. The first lender who can explain this to me with any sort of clarity will get my business. Whenever I fill out a loan application (who say the process is easy) after the umptenth document upload I remind myself of why i deal in cash.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
rate is never irrelevant. it's one of the most important factors of the loan.
@Stacey Jones, I am not a mortgage broker, but I will give a couple thoughts:
1. In a real sense, NOBODY who gets a loan needs one!
Loans are not given based on need, in fact if you are "in need" aka financially distressed you are unlikely to qualify for a loan.
2. Just because you have cash today, doesn't mean you will have it after the loan closes! A lender knows that just because you could pay off the loan when its originated, doesn't mean you will keep and hold that cash and be in the same position for the life of the loan.
So, your cash position aka "don't need anyway", isn't the be-all end-all you feel it is.
3. Get your documents together ahead of time. Most things can be anticipated depending on the type of loan. Things like an updated personal financial statement, tax returns, profit & loss statement, property tax bills/payments, rent roll, etc are all pretty common documents that can be anticipated and prepped ahead of time.
When you have things together before you start it doesn't feel as onerous when they request things.
4. And you DO "need" those loans! If you buy 1 house in cash for $100k and it goes up 5%/year in market appreciation you gain $5k that first year in equity.
However, if you use that $100k for 5 down payments on five $100k houses that appreciate 5%/year than you gain $25k that first year in equity!
5. Perhaps consider buying in cash AND THEN doing a cash-out refi on the back end.
The one downside is a slightly lower LTV on average, but you can often negotiate a better deal with cash and after closing do minor improvements to the property before the refi. Those might be raising rents and stabilizing the property or even just some light rehab work. The value added from the after closing effort might offset the LTV difference entirely!
The lender is taking on risk, and their job is to verify both your ability to repay the loan and the property's ability to serve as collateral if something goes wrong. Even if you have plenty of cash, they still have to follow their underwriting guidelines and regulatory requirements.
One thing I've learned over the years is that lenders aren't really underwriting the borrower you are today; they're underwriting the possibility that something unexpected happens tomorrow. That's why they ask for so much documentation.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
Interest rate may only be irrelevant if you don't have the money to pay cash. Since I do it is worth weighing how much I could possibly get from that sum elsewhere when I decide if I want to finance or not.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
Interest rate may only be irrelevant if you don't have the money to pay cash. Since I do it is worth weighing how much I could possibly get from that sum elsewhere when I decide if I want to finance or not.
Why waste the time?!? In the long run the math will be on the side of using leverage with real estate if the deal is decent.
If your math isn't showing you that, you should get someone to look at it critically and show you where you aren't looking at it fairly.
There are reasons to buy and hold in cash, BUT it is almost NEVER about getting a better return in the long run.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
rate is never irrelevant. it's one of the most important factors of the loan.
I also understand that leverage is a powerful tool however for me it largely depends on my current AA and how that looks RE vs TSM index funds. I'm also adverse to jumping through the hoops of financing when my credit and net worth are quite respectable. I do take a second look if rates are 5% or less. If 5% or greater I'm paying cash which generally buys me a better chance at getting the property and a few bucks off asking price.
rate is never irrelevant. it's one of the most important factors of the loan.
You are looking at it completely in the wrong context!
In business, money is made on the spread. The difference between what you can get money for and what you can deploy it to do.
If you as a lender want to make 8% and to you that is a good return. When evaluating deals, if you can obtain money for 12% and lend it for 20% and make your 8% spread you are happy. You don't complain and say you refuse to do business unless you can obtain the money for 5% and lend for 13%.
The cost of the money you are getting is irrelevant IF you are making the return you desire. That doesn't mean you don't try to obtain money cheaper, BUT it isn't a factor on its own about whether business is good or not.
this is what i have never understood, i have more than enough money to buy a propety for cash. so i am convinced to "use other peoples money" or to get a loan to leverage your money. I sorta get that. What I dont understand is why lenders ask and require so much information in order to get a loan that i dont need anyway. The first lender who can explain this to me with any sort of clarity will get my business. Whenever I fill out a loan application (who say the process is easy) after the umptenth document upload I remind myself of why i deal in cash.
The amount of questions asked depends on the type of loan you are applying for..
A general rule of thumb, the lower the rate/expense the more questions will be asked.
If you are looking for the quickest capital, you might want to look into short term hard money loans. Lenders will look at the deal itself a lot more than your income, credit, and background. Generally most hard money lenders will still want to see proof of funds, check credit, and have you fill out a generic application. The decision to lend however, is generally based on the loan story and property
because they are loaning out their money and they don't know you.so they have to ensure you qualify for their product.
this is risk management 101.
The level of documentation required is going to be dependent on the loan type and specific lender. As a general rule your government backed loans (Conventional, FHA, VA) are going to require the most documentation (in return you receive the lowest rate at the time for your qualifications) as they are going through automated underwriting systems that have specific criteria and depending on your scenario and specific lender guidelines it could require more/less paperwork. Your non-traditional (or Non-QM) requirements are going to be dependent on the scenario and lender and will usually require less paperwork but the trade-off is a slightly higher rate from prime and varying guidelines from lender to lender which a mortgage broker can help you navigate or you can research/reach out to individual lenders.
Unfortunately paperwork is a necessary evil post the 2008 housing crash and all of the guidelines around "ability-to-repay". My general suggestion, if you have the capital, is to purchase using cash and then finance afterwards so all your capital is not tied up in 1 property and you're not on a sales deadline and can take your time finding the right financing structure.
@Stacey Jones I respect your frustration. When you have enough cash to close, the loan process can feel unnecessarily intrusive and inefficient.
However, I think @Kevin Sobilo made a strong point that lenders are not underwriting whether you “need” the loan. They are underwriting whether the loan remains safe after closing.
As @Denise Suplee noted, at the simplest level, lending money is risky. Even a strong borrower and a good property still require due diligence because the lender has to reduce the risk of loss. Your cash position today is important, but it does not eliminate the lender’s need to verify the full picture.
From the lender’s side, they still need to understand:
So the documentation is not really about questioning whether you are financially capable. It is about proving that the transaction is sound enough for the lender to put capital at risk.
That said, I agree with your larger point: lenders and brokers should do a better job explaining the “why” behind each document request. A borrower with cash and experience should not feel like they are being dragged through a mystery process.
In your case, the cleanest approach may be deciding upfront whether leverage is worth the inconvenience. If the goal is speed, certainty, and simplicity, cash may win. If the goal is liquidity, scale, or preserving capital for multiple deals, then financing may be worth the documentation burden.
The right lender should be able to tell you clearly, at the beginning, what they need, why they need it, and what loan structure makes the effort worthwhile.
I used to be bothered by all the loan underwriting, until I started lending my own money.
Risk feels different when you’re on the other side of the fence, and you bet you’re gonna do a lot of due diligence when lending to strangers.
The short answer to your question is this: The paperwork mountain doesn't exist because lenders doubt your wealth—it exists because of the specific loan product you are applying for.
When you look at financing, lenders generally look at the risk through two entirely different lenses. It all depends on which bucket your loan officer put you in:
1. Traditional Income-Based Loans (High Paperwork):
If you are doing a conventional or traditional loan, the underwriting is strictly bound by federal guidelines and algorithms. These loans require the lender to prove your personal ability to repay based on steady, predictable monthly income flow. Even if you have $1 Million in the bank, standard guidelines often won't let a lender just look at your bank balance and say "looks good!" Instead, they are forced to calculate your Debt-to-Income (DTI) ratio. To do that legally, they have to document the origin of every dollar, tax returns, W-2s, or profit/loss statements. More reliance on personal income = more documentation required to back it up.
2. Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) Loans (Low Paperwork):
Since you are looking to leverage your money to buy property, there is an alternative built specifically for investors like you who want to skip the red tape. A true DSCR loan doesn't care about your personal job, your tax returns, or your W-2s. The loan is supported by the property’s income, not your personal income. If the rental income of the property covers the mortgage payment (the Debt Service Coverage Ratio), the property qualifies itself. Because we aren't auditing your personal financial life to calculate a DTI, the documentation drop is massive.
If you’ve been drowning in document uploads, you are likely in a traditional loan product that is a bad fit for your goals and your financial profile. If you want to use "other people's money" without the headache, you should look at a DSCR product. You show the asset makes sense, the lender or broker will verify you have the liquid funds for the down payment, and you skip the endless paperwork.
***Beyond the loan product itself, who you work with plays a massive role in your paperwork load. If you work directly with a traditional bank or retail lender, you are bound to that single institution's specific guidelines and their strict internal rules (called "overlays"). However, working with a mortgage broker changes the game. A broker isn't tied to one bank; we have access to a vast network of wholesale investors. This means we can shop around for the most aggressive, investor-friendly programs that inherently require far less paperwork.
thank you all for educating on the ins and outs of financing. I think my frustration/hesitation with leveraging my assest has hindered me somewhat when it comes to making deals. My big problem has always been the paperwork. Thank you guys for showing me how to be "business" like in the process. If I am going to do a DSCR loan, what paperwork should I have prior to even applying for the loan.
It would be easy.if I had a DSCR upload package, send all the information at one time to different lenders and let them say yes or no.
I feel "some kinda way" when i apply for a loan. I know that I have been denied loans because I have a tendency to pay cash. When lenders start asking for more Information I admittedly get a little immature/impatient about it and just pay cash. I see how that doesn't always put me in the position that I want to be in but Im not going to be made to feel "unworthy" of your money (meaning the lender). That has been my common experience
Sit on the opposite side of the table, go be a lender with that same capital. See what they are thinking about, ask yourself that same question again.
You can also pay cash for a houses, then re-finance out. It's perfectly normal to be annoyed with the ridiculous, outdated, and inefficient process of underwriting. I do not blame you, but just be super prepared for this and get everything in order before you do it. This is one sector that desperately needs (technology based) disruption.
Here is what I find a bit funny . You need mountains of paperwork to buy a property . BUT I can walk in to an truck dealer and buy a $250,000 tri axle dump truck with 5% down and drive it home the same day with a basic credit check . Same thing for a center console fishing boat . Now if I did buy that boat my wife would be furious at me , BUT I would still have a boat .
Here is what I find a bit funny . You need mountains of paperwork to buy a property . BUT I can walk in to an truck dealer and buy a $250,000 tri axle dump truck with 5% down and drive it home the same day with a basic credit check . Same thing for a center console fishing boat . Now if I did buy that boat my wife would be furious at me , BUT I would still have a boat .
Yes and no...
1. Your ability to pay the loans will be scrutinized differently. A person who can qualify for a $250k mortgage may not qualify for a $250k truck loan!
2. MANY things can affect title to real estate in ways that are different than a vehicle. For example, a judgement lien from last year would have 1st lien position on a house you purchase today whereas it would NOT with a vehicle purchase.
3. Repossession of a vehicle CAN be done more simply and cheaply in many cases with a repossession whereas a foreclosure of real estate is very time consuming and expensive.
4. Auto loan rates tend to be HIGHER than mortgage rates! The higher rate helps lower the risk they take making the loan because they collect more interest from the successful loans to offset any bad loans.
5. Auto loans are SHORTER time periods! By paying down the loans faster, that also reduces the risk for the lender.
Assuming flat valuations, it takes ~7 years to pay a mortgage down to the break even point to resell when factoring in commissions, transfer tax, and other closing costs! Within 7 years, most every available car loan would be paid off entirely!
I think the simplest answer is that the lender is trying to answer one question: "If we lend you our money, how likely are we to get it back?"
The reason it feels excessive is that many lenders are evaluating not only the property, but also your income, assets, debts, tax returns, bank statements, credit, and more. They're building a complete risk profile.
Ironically, investors like you who have enough cash to buy outright often find the process the most frustrating because you've already proven you can close without financing. That's one reason some real estate investors prefer asset-based lending, where the property's value and cash flow may carry more weight than personal documentation.
Out of curiosity, what type of loans have you been applying for—conventional, DSCR, commercial, or something else?
It's all about risk. As a Loan Officer, I'm typically confirming your eligibility within the first conversation. Giving you the minimum requirements upfront helps to alleviate any headaches in the backend.
Providing a term sheet will always be the first step, as to not drag you into any of the process before confirming that it's what you're looking for. If everything looks good, then you're ready to move forward.
First time borrower underwriting is typically what scares people off. But once you've done it, you don't have to again. From there, it's just qualifying each deal with terms. It becomes easier and quicker with each loan.
This industry is all about building the relationship and trust from the get-go. It just takes a few more initial steps to do so.
I'd be happy to connect to discuss this further and see what you've got in the works.
Hi @Stacey Jones, welcome to BP!
As a lender, I'll give you the simplest answer I can.
The reason lenders ask for so much documentation isn't because they don't trust you—it's because they're taking risk on an asset and borrower they don't control. Even if you have enough cash to buy the property outright, the lender still needs to answer a few fundamental questions:
Think about it this way: if someone asked to borrow $500,000 from you, would you hand it over based solely on their word that they have plenty of money in the bank? Probably not. You'd want documentation too.
That said, I think many investors share your frustration because some lenders collect documents that don't seem relevant to the specific loan. That's one reason why many real estate investors gravitate toward DSCR loans, asset-based lending, or private lending programs. These programs often focus more on the property's cash flow, equity, and exit strategy than on tax returns, employment history, and personal income documentation.
Ironically, the investors with the most liquidity are often the ones who dislike borrowing the most—not because they can't qualify, but because they value their time and simplicity. For many of them, the decision comes down to whether the leverage creates enough additional return to justify the paperwork.
The best lenders understand that. Their goal shouldn't be to collect the most documents possible—it should be to collect only the documents necessary to make a sound lending decision and get the deal closed efficiently.
Out of curiosity, what's usually the breaking point for you? Is it the financial documentation, the repeated requests for the same documents, or the overall length of the process? Those tend to be three very different pain points.
for me its the false advertising. "it a simple loan or this is all the documentation we need" simular things like that. The other problem for me is the lenders dont simply say what they need up front. I had to scenarios. The first was an insurance company. The agent called me, asked me questions and told .me exactly what I needed and I was done in a couple days. The lender call me, asked a few questions, then sent me a portal link that asked for information I wasn't told that I needed. I called/emailed back and forth for information and after three weeks im still not done. So im left to belive that every lender will just operate in a simular way. For example the lender advertized a DSCR loan. They send me a portal link for the loan. DSCR loan was not even an option on their own website. So then you left with phone calls and emails to clarify what they want. I simply hate the "bait and switch"
I realize that using leverage is good for me but i just hate the shell game of it. So most of the time i just pay cash just because of it. Simplly tell me everything i need and say yes or no so i can go on to someone ekse or a different option.
for me its the false advertising. "it a simple loan or this is all the documentation we need" simular things like that. The other problem for me is the lenders dont simply say what they need up front. I had to scenarios. The first was an insurance company. The agent called me, asked me questions and told .me exactly what I needed and I was done in a couple days. The lender call me, asked a few questions, then sent me a portal link that asked for information I wasn't told that I needed. I called/emailed back and forth for information and after three weeks im still not done. So im left to belive that every lender will just operate in a simular way. For example the lender advertized a DSCR loan. They send me a portal link for the loan. DSCR loan was not even an option on their own website. So then you left with phone calls and emails to clarify what they want. I simply hate the "bait and switch"
I realize that using leverage is good for me but i just hate the shell game of it. So most of the time i just pay cash just because of it. Simplly tell me everything i need and say yes or no so i can go on to someone ekse or a different option.
I definitely get the frustration there. False advertising/bait and switch has no room in this industry, so that shouldn't be something you have to deal with, but I get that it can still happen with some.
That's why choosing a lender is so important and knowing exactly what all documentation is going to be needed upfront before you get in the weeds. Giving you a list and details on what will be required is the transparency borrowers need from the get-go.
Again, I know it can seem like a headache for the initial docs. But it shouldn't be something that drags out, especially not over weeks.
Hey Stacey,
The simple answer is that the lender is taking on risk and wants to verify everything before lending hundreds of thousands (or millions) of dollars.
From your perspective, you don't need the loan. From their perspective, they're putting their money at risk and need to confirm your income, assets, debts, creditworthiness, and ability to repay. That's why the process can feel excessive.
That said, I completely understand the frustration. One of the biggest advantages of being a cash buyer is speed and simplicity. A lot of investors are willing to accept lower returns just to avoid the paperwork and uncertainty that come with financing.
The real value of leverage isn't that it's easier. It's that it allows you to control more assets with the same amount of capital. Whether that's worth the extra documentation is ultimately a personal decision.
I'm a real estate broker based in NYC and Long Island. Happy to share ideas and answer questions. Feel free to reach out anytime, my DMs are always open.
this is what i have never understood, i have more than enough money to buy a propety for cash. so i am convinced to "use other peoples money" or to get a loan to leverage your money. I sorta get that. What I dont understand is why lenders ask and require so much information in order to get a loan that i dont need anyway. The first lender who can explain this to me with any sort of clarity will get my business. Whenever I fill out a loan application (who say the process is easy) after the umptenth document upload I remind myself of why i deal in cash.
this is what i have never understood, i have more than enough money to buy a propety for cash. so i am convinced to "use other peoples money" or to get a loan to leverage your money. I sorta get that. What I dont understand is why lenders ask and require so much information in order to get a loan that i dont need anyway. The first lender who can explain this to me with any sort of clarity will get my business. Whenever I fill out a loan application (who say the process is easy) after the umptenth document upload I remind myself of why i deal in cash.
You're thinking risk = your net worth. Lenders think risk = will this specific loan get repaid on time, and can we prove that to everyone who reviews the file after us.
Why leverage anyway: if you can borrow at 6% against an asset returning more than that, or keep your cash liquid and working elsewhere instead of tied up in one purchase, leverage does something cash can't. That's the actual argument for "other people's money," independent of whether you need the loan.
What speeds it up: ask about portfolio lending (they keep the loan, so requirements can flex more), asset-based or reduced-doc products, and whether repeat business earns a lighter file next time. That's where the real friction gets cut, not by finding someone who claims "no docs needed."