$100k Reno Gap and 5 Undisclosed Vacancies Killed Our Multifamily Deal

$100k Reno Gap and 5 Undisclosed Vacancies Killed Our Multifamily Deal

Member since 2026 · 5 posts · 2 votes

My team and I had an LOI signed on a 50-unit deal in eastern Texas. The numbers looked great. We had talked the seller down about 20% from his asking price and were positioned for a 21% IRR on a three-year hold. It felt good to find a real deal in this market.

Then we did a round of in-person due diligence.

I know from experience that a property is never as nice as the seller describes. This one was worse than that. It needed at least $100k more in renovations than we had budgeted. On top of that, the seller failed to disclose five vacancies that had occurred the week prior. Those vacancies killed the day-one cash flow that our team treats as non-negotiable.

The seller wouldn't move further on price to account for the lower value. Just like that, the deal was dead.

Was it a waste of time? You could look at it that way. I'd rather look at what it confirmed: photos and rent rolls tell you what the seller wants you to see, and boots on the ground tell you what you're actually buying. We got the reno gap and the vacancy problem for the price of a trip instead of finding out post-close.

1Reply
128 views

2 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Agent · Kansas City · Member since 2018 · 4k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    1mo

    That's why due diligence is vital. Sellers always think their property is gold

  • online · Member since 2026 · 99 posts · 44 votes
    1mo

    The "photos and rent rolls tell you what the seller wants you to see, boots on the ground tell you what you're actually buying" line is exactly right, and it's the same gap that shows up after closing too, not just during diligence.

    Once you own it, the equivalent mistake is modeling maintenance reserves off a flat percentage instead of actually knowing the age of each system. Same failure mode as your reno gap: the number on paper looks fine until you find out half the building's original systems are past due, and by then you're not walking away from an LOI, you're just absorbing the surprise.

    Sounds like the in-person trip paid for itself just by killing a deal that would've been worse later. Good instinct to trust what you found over what the numbers implied.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.