What's One Tenant Screening Practice You Never Skip?

Question

As portfolios grow, screening becomes even more important.

What's one step in your screening process that's saved you the most headaches?

Jim Johnson · Answer

Consistency. Every applicant goes through the same screening process using the same criteria. It's easy to make exceptions when you're trying to fill a vacancy, but those exceptions often end up being the most expensive decisions. A consistent process not only leads to better residents, but also helps ensure you're applying your standards fairly across every application.

Mike Fisher · Answer

Great question Linda. A couple of folks already hit prior-landlord references and the 3x income check, both of which I agree with, so I will add the one that gets skipped most: read the payment pattern, not the raw credit score.

A 640 who has paid on time for two years is a safer bet than a 720 with three recent late accounts. The score is a snapshot; the trend tells you what next month looks like. I pull the tradelines and actually look at the last 12 to 24 months of behavior instead of stopping at the number.

The other thing I never skip is applying the exact same written criteria to every applicant. I set the income multiple, the credit floor, and the background standards in writing before anyone applies, then run every person through the identical checklist. It keeps the decision objective, it holds up under Fair Housing, and it stops me from talking myself into a marginal applicant because I liked them in person.

I have invested in Chicago-area rentals since 1991 and run MF CashFlow Property Management in the south and southwest suburbs, and that consistent-criteria habit has saved me more headaches than any single background flag. Happy to compare notes on what is screening well right now.

Drew Sygit · Answer

Cross-referencing all addresses in the last 2 years from the background check against the application and investigating undisclosed ones.

Aaron Zimmerman · Answer

Eviction and previous landlord checks

Janice Carter · Answer

@Linda Murray For me, it is verifying income, employment, rental history and running a full background and credit check. I also never accept Zillow applications. I use my own screening process and I never ignore red flags, no matter how eager I am to fill a vacancy. Those extra steps have saved me from costly mistakes.

Amit Patel · Answer

Hey Linda,

Calling previous landlords, not just the last one, is one of the best practices I never skip either. The current landlord sometimes gives a glowing reference just to get the tenant out. Going back two or three landlords often reveals the real story about payment habits, maintenance issues, and how they actually treated the property.

Another step I always do is verify income with recent pay stubs, tax returns, or bank statements, and make sure it is at least three times the rent. Too many times we see people who look good on paper but cannot actually afford the place once other bills are paid.

I also run a full criminal background check and eviction history search on every adult who will live there. These flags have stopped more problems than almost anything else.

These few steps have saved us from a lot of future headaches.

Layf Van Der Merwe · Answer

Hi Linda, for us it’s verifying rental history and employment directly. We recently had an applicant whose paperwork looked perfect, but their previous landlord reported unpaid rent and that the home had been left in poor condition. We’re also seeing more forged pay stubs lately, so we never rely on the documents alone.

Marc Winter · Answer

Unified Judicial court records, and Sex Offender registration.

Victor Patel · Answer

For me, it's verifying income and rental history independently—not just accepting what an applicant puts on the application.

I always:

• Verify employment and income with documentation.
• Speak with the current and, if possible, the previous landlord (the previous landlord is often more candid).
• Compare the application against the credit report and public records for inconsistencies.

One thing I've learned is that it's usually not one big red flag that predicts problems—it's several small inconsistencies. An applicant who can't explain gaps in employment, has conflicting addresses, or provides information that doesn't quite line up often ends up being a much higher risk than someone with a lower credit score but a straightforward, verifiable application.

I'd rather have a qualified tenant move in a week later than rush to fill a vacancy with the wrong person.

Carlos Hennings · Answer

Using direct connect tools for income and employment verification rather than accepting paper pay stubs and bank statements or making calls to employers.

What's One Tenant Screening Practice You Never Skip?

Most Popular Reply